[PdCl2{P(NH2Pri)2CH2But}2] 7 1H NMR (d6-benzene, 295 K): d 3.5 [s,
3
br, 2H, NH], 2.8 [sept., 2H, CH(CH3)2, J(HH) 7.1 Hz], 1.8 [d, 4H, CH2P,
2J(HP) 3.92 Hz], 1.39 [s, 9H, C(CH3)3, ], 1.05 [d, 12H, CH(CH3)2, 3J(HH) 4.1
3
Hz] 1.19 [d, 12H, CH(CH3)2, J(HH) 4.1 Hz]. 13C-{1H} NMR+d 44.3
[C(CH3)3], 41.1 [pseudo-t, PCH2, 1J(PC) 22 Hz], 32.6 [br, C(CH3)3], 31.09
[NCH], 26.1, 25.6 [d, CH(CH3)2]. 31P-{1H} NMR d 64.8. EI-MS m/z (%):
614 (25) [M]+ , 543 (5) [M 2 (CC(CH3)3]+. Analysis calculated for
C22H54Cl2N4P2Pd: C, 43.04; H, 8.87. Found: C, 43.00; H, 8.90%.
Scheme 3
‡ Crystal data for C36H66Cl2N4P2Pd 7: M = 794.2, triclinic, a = 7.869(3),
b = 10.919(3), c = 12.754(5) Å, a = 90.44(3), b = 103.26(3), g =
¯
95.81(3)°, U = 1060.6(6) Å3, T = 173(2) K, space group P1 (no. 2), Z =
trans-orientation in 7 and the phosphorus atoms display a
tetrahedral coordination geometry.
1, l(Mo-Ka) = 0.71073 Å, 5107 reflections measured which were used in
all calculations. Final R indices for [I > 2s(I)] with 4563 reflections was R1
= 0.038. Single crystals of [PdCl2{P(NH2Pri)2CH2(But)}2] were grown
from a saturated toluene solution (253 °C), mounted in inert oil and
transferred to the cold gas stream of the diffractometer. The structure was
solved using direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares on F2.
crystallographic files in .cif format.
Surprisingly, a survey of the literature shows a relative
paucity of structural information on diaminophosphines and
only P(Ar*NH)2Ar (Ar* = C6H2But3-2,4,6)16 and P(ArfN-
H)2Ar* (Arf
=
C6H2(CF3)3-2,4,6)17 have been crystallo-
graphically characterised. A few complexes of the group 6
metals have also been reported.18
The mechanism of formation of the diaminophosphine has
not been fully determined, however Winter et al.19 reported that
treatment of TiCl4 with an excess of primary amines affords
imido complexes of type [TiCl2(NR)(NH2R)x)] 9 which clearly
are likely candidates for the active catalytic species. Fur-
thermore, in unpublished results Regitz and Asmus20 have
1 R. Tauber, in Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic
Compounds, ed. B. Cornils and W. A. Herrmann, VCH, Weinheim,
1996, vol. 1, p. 507.
2 P. L. McGrane, M. Jensen and T. Livinghouse, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992,
114, 5459.
3 E. M. Campi and W. R. Jackson, J. Organomet. Chem., 1996, 523,
205.
5
recently shown that the reaction of [Ti(h -C5H5)Cl3] with
5
ButNH2
and
PCBut
in
toluene
yields
[Ti(h -
4 K. Utimoto, Pure Appl. Chem., 1983, 55, 1845.
5 Y. Fukuda, K. Utimoto and H. Nozaki, Heterocycles, 1987, 25, 297.
6 Y. Li, P. F. Fu and T. J. Marks, Organometallics, 1994, 13, 439.
7 J. Barluenga and F. Azar, Synthesis, 1975, 704.
8 F. Esser, Synthesis, 1987, 5, 460; R. C. Larock, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1978, 17, 27.
9 J. Barluenga and F. Aznar, Synthesis, 1977, 195.
10 Y. Li and T.J. Marks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 707.
11 A. Haskel, T. Straub and M. S. Eisen, Organometallics, 1996, 15,
3773.
12 P. J. Walsh, A. M. Baranger and R. G. Bergman, J. Am Chem. Soc.,
1992, 114, 1708.
13 M. Regitz and P. Binger, in Multiple bonds and Low Coordination in
Phosphorus Chemistry, ed. M. Regitz and O. J. Scherer, Thieme,
Stuttgart, 1990 and references cited therein.
C5H5)Cl{PNBut(NHBut)CHBut}] 10, (probably via a [2 + 2]
addition of PCBut to the intermediate titanium imide
[Ti(C5H5)Cl(NBut)], followed by a 1,2 addition of NH2But
across the activated PNC bond) (Scheme 3).
The mechanism of formation of the diaminophosphines 5 and
6 by di-hydroamination of PCBut probably proceeds via the
intermediacy
of
[TiCl2(NR)(NH2R)x)]
9
and
[TiCl2(NR)P(NHR)CHBut] which is analogous to 10, the
excess [NH3ButCl] formed subsequently removing the resulting
substrate ‘{PNR(NHR)CHBut}’ via a double protonation
step.
We thank the EPSRC for financial support (D. J. W.) and
Professor Manfred Regitz for unpublished results cited in ref.
20.
14 K. B. Dillon, F. Mathey and J. F. Nixon, in Phosphorus the Carbon
Copy, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1998.
15 F. G. N. Cloke, P. B. Hitchcock, J. F. Nixon, D. J. Wilson and P.
Mountford, Chem. Commun., 1999, 661.
16 E. G. Bent, R. Schaeffer, R. C. Haltiwanger and A. D. Norman, Inorg.
Chem., 1990, 29, 2608; P. B. Hitchcock, H. A. Jasim, M. F. Lappert and
H. D. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1986, 1634.
17 J. T. Ahlemann, H. W. Roesky, R. Murugavel, E. Parsini, M.
Noltemeyer, H. G. Smidt, O. Muller, R. Herbst-Irmer, L. N. Markovskii
and Y. G. Shermolovich, Chem. Ber., 1997, 130, 1113.
18 E. Lindner, H. Rauleder and W. Hiller, Z. Naturforsch., 1983, 38B,
417.
19 T. S. Lewkebandara, P. H. Sheridan, M. J. Heeg, A. L. Rheingold and
C. H. Winter, Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33, 5879.
20 S. M. F. Asmus, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kaiserslautern, 1999. M.
Regitz, personal communication.
Notes and references
t
† Characterisation data for: P(NHPri)2CH2 Bu 5: 1H NMR (d6-benzene,
295 K) d 2.36 [sept, 1H, CH, 3J(HH) 6.4 Hz], 1.4 [d, 2H, CH2, 2J(HP) 2.5 Hz],
1.31 [d, 2H, NHC(CH3)3, 3J(HH) 7.14 Hz], 1.11 [s, PCH2C(CH3)3], 1.05, 1.0
[d 3 2, 12H, CH(CH3)2]. 31P-{1H} NMR d 57.16.
P(NHBut)2CH2But 6: 1H NMR (d6-benzene, 295 K): d 1.19 [s, 18H,
CH2C(CH3)3], 1.09 [s, 9H, C(CH3)3], 1.27 [d, br, 2H, CH2]. 13C-{1H} NMR
d 55.9 [d, C(CH3)3, 2J(CP) 6.83 Hz], 50.97 [d, PC, 1J(CP) 14 Hz], 32.69 [d,
NHC(CH3)3, 3J(CP) 8.93 Hz], 31.80 [d, CH2C(CH3)3, 2J(CP) 9.03 Hz], 31.1
[d, NHC(CH3)3, 2J(CP) 12.28 Hz] 31P-{1H}: NMR d 40.88. EI-MS m/z (%):
246 (30) [M]+, 233 (13) [M 2 (Me)]+, 175 (80) [M 2 (NHBut) 2 (Me)].
2388
Chem. Commun., 2000, 2387–2388