Facile and Selective Deallylation of Allyl Ethers
species by π-back-donation to facilitate the proton-
transfer in C.
As described below, complex 1 exhibits high catalytic
performance for deallylation of a variety of allylic ethers
in aniline. The reactions can be conducted in air without
loss of various functionalities.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
First of all, the catalytic reactions were examined with
aliphatic ethers as substrates. The results are sum-
marized in Table 1. As a representative example, allyl
hexyl ether (2; 71 mg, 0.50 mmol) was treated with 2 mol
% of 1 in aniline (0.46 mL, 5.0 mmol) at 50 °C. The
reaction was completed in 2 h as confirmed by GLC. The
reaction mixture was poured into a 6 N HCl solution and
extracted with Et2O. Purification of the ethereal extract
by silica gel column chromatography gave a 95% yield of
n-hexanol. The deallylation could be performed also in
toluene (0.8 mL) as a solvent using 2 equiv of aniline
(1.0 mmol), while the reaction became somewhat slower
(6 h) at the same temperature.
A variety of aliphatic ethers (3-14) were similarly
deallylated. The present catalysis could be successfully
applied to the substrates having vinyl (3), alkynyl (5),
hydroxy (5), acetoxy (7, 8), silyloxy (9, 10), and acetal
(11-14) groups. In particular, TBDMS (9, 10), THP (11),
and MOM (12) as typical protecting groups for alcohols
remained unchanged in the catalytic reactions. Thus, the
allylic deprotection catalyzed by 1 is compatible with
other protection methods of alcohols. All reactions pro-
ceeded quantitatively as confirmed by GLC. 4-Pentenol
derived from 3 was significantly volatile, and its isolated
yield was somewhat lowered (84%). Since the products
having acetal units were unstable under acidic condi-
tions, their isolation was carried out directly by column
chromatography without acid extraction.
In this paper, we report application of this novel
catalysis. A particular interest is focused on catalytic
deallylation of allylic ethers (eq 2). Thus, the protection
and deprotection of alcohols are central subjects in
organic synthesis, especially in carbohydrate synthesis.8
The allyl group is utilized as a versatile protecting group,
owing to the easy introduction as well as the high
stability of the resulting ethers under a wide range of
reaction conditions. The deprotection was originally
achieved by two-steps procedures, consisting of transition
metal-catalyzed isomerization of allyl group and hydroly-
sis or oxidative cleavage of the resulting enol ethers.9
More recently, one-step procedures have been investi-
gated as more convenient methods (e.g., DDQ,10 NaBH4/
I2,11 TiCl3/Li/THF,12 Yb(OTf)3,13 electrochemically gener-
ated Ni,14 ZrCl4/NaBH4,15 TMSCl/NaI,16 CeCl3‚7H2O/
NaI,17 TiCl4/Bu4NI,18 t-BuLi,19 I2,20 p-TSA,21 and SmI222).
The palladium-catalyzed allylation has been examined
as a simple approach to catalytic deprotection.8a,23-28
(7) (a) Mathey, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1578. (b) Mathey,
F. J . Organomet. Chem. 2002, 646, 15. (c) Yoshifuji, M. Phosphorus
Sulfur 2002, 177, 1827. (d) Le Floch, P.; Mathey, F. Coord. Chem. Rev.
1998, 179-180, 771. (e) Yoshifuji, M. J . Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1998, 3343.
(8) (a) Guibe´, F. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 2967. (b) J arowicki, K.;
Kocienski, P. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 57, 2109.
(9) Greene, T, W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protecting Groups in Organic
Synthesis, 3rd ed.; J ohn Wiley and Sons: New York, 1999.
(10) (a) Yadav, J . S.; Chandrasekhar, S.; Sumithra, G.; Kache, R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6603. (b) Vate`le, J . M. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 58, 5689.
(11) Thomas, R. M.; Mohan, G. H.; Iyengar, D. S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 4721.
(12) Talukdar, S.; Nayak, S. K.; Banerji, A. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
4925.
(13) Sharma, G. V. M.; Ilangovan, A.; Mahalingam, A. K. J . Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 9103.
(14) Yasuhara, A.; Kasano, A.; Sakamoto, T. J . Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 4211.
Deallylation of aromatic ethers could be performed
much more easily with 0.1 mol % of 1 at 30 °C (eq 3).
Table 2 lists the results for allyl phenyl ethers having a
variety of para-substituents. The reactions were com-
pleted within 30 min, except for 21 and 22 having the
acetyl and bromo substituents, giving almost quantitative
yields of phenols after chromatographic purification. The
reaction of 15 was accomplished in a few minutes, when
the amount of catalyst was increased to 0.5 mol %.
(15) Chary, K. P.; Mohan, G. H.; Iyengar, D. S. Chem. Lett. 1999,
28, 1223.
(16) Kamal, A.; Laxman, E.; Rao, N. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
371.
(17) Thomas, R. M.; Reddy, G. S.; Iyengar, D. S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 7293.
(18) Tsuritani, T.; Shinokubo, H.; Oshima, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 8121.
(19) Bailey, W. F.; England, M. D.; Mealy, M. J .; Thongsornkleeb,
C.; Teng, L. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 489.
(20) Vate`le, J . M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 58, 5689.
(21) Babu, K. S.; Raju, B. C.; Srinivas, P. V.; Rao, A. S.; Kumar, S.
P.; Rao, J . M. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32, 704.
(22) Dahle´n, A.; Sundgren, A.; Lahmann, M.; Oscarson, S.; Hilmers-
son, G. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4085.
(23) (a) Honda, M.; Morita, H.; Nagakura, I. J . Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 8932. (b) Opatz, T.; Kunz, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 10185.
(24) Franco, D.; Panyella, D.; Rocamora, M.; Gomez, M.; Clinet, J .
C.; Muller, G.; Dun˜ach, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 5685.
(25) Fisher, M.; Brown, R. C. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8227.
(26) Chandrasekhar, S.; Reddy, C. R.; Rao, R. J . Tetrahedron 2001,
57, 3435.
We next examined deprotection of allyloxycarbonyl
(Alloc), which is known to be a useful protecting group
for the hydroxy groups in carbohydrates and amino and
imido groups in nucleoside bases and peptides. Very
recently, deprotection of this group from several carbam-
ates has been examined with Pd(PPh3)4 (1 mol %) and
K2CO3 (3 equiv) in MeOH, where the reactions take hours
(28) Vutukuri, D. R.; Bharathi, P.; Yu, Z.; Rajasekaran, K.; Tran,
(27) Tsukamoto, H.; Kondo, Y. Synlett 2003, 1061.
M.-H.; Thayumanavan, S. J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1146.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 13, 2004 4483