[4-3H]EGCg Synthesis and Its Metabolic Fate in Rats
J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 49, No. 2, 2001 1043
boro[3H]hydride (NaB3H4) was obtained from Amersham-
Pharmacia (TRK838), and all other reagents were of analytical
grade. For structural analyses of EGCg peracetate, 4-bromo-
EGCg peracetate, and [4-2H]EGCg, mass spectra were re-
corded on a J EOL DX-303 mass spectrometer and NMR
spectra were obtained on a J EOL Lambda-500 system. The
NMR chemical shifts were given in ppm (δ) with tetrameth-
ylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. High-resolution fast
atom bombardment mass spectrometry (HR-FABMS) was
measured on a Finnigan Mat 95 instrument at the Mass
Spectrometry Service, University of Minnesota. Elemental
analysis was performed at Microanalytica Narita (J apan).
Mass and 3H NMR spectra of [4-3H]EGCg were measured at
Amersham Pharmacia Biotec (UK).
concentrated to remove acetonitrile. The product deposited in
the concentrated solution was collected with a membrane filter
(Advantec) and then washed with 500 mL of distilled water.
The resulting product was dried under reduced pressure to
give the compound 3 (600 mg, 46% yield). The purity of the
product was found to be 99% by analytical HPLC under the
same conditions as described in the preparation of 2. Full
assignments of 1H and 13C NMR spectra were done by HMBC
and HMQC experiments.
HR-FABMS (positive) m/z: 873.0935 [M+H]+, 875.0915
[M+H]+ (Calcd. for C38H33O19BrH, 873.0878; 875.0858). 1H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.24 (s, 6H, CH3-Ac × 2), 2.26 (s,
3H, CH3-Ac), 2.27 (s, 3H, CH3-Ac), 2.28 (s, 6H, CH3-Ac ×
2), 2.29 (s, 3H, CH3-Ac), 2.37 (s, 3H, CH3-Ac), 5.38 (d, 1H,
H-4, J ) 2.0 Hz), 5.64 (dd, 1H, H-3, J ) 0.9, 2.0 Hz), 5.87 (br
s, 1H, H-2), 6.74 (d, 1H, H-8, J ) 2.5 Hz), 6.77 (d, 1H, H-6, J
) 2.5 Hz), 7.30 (s, 2H, H-2′, 6′), 7.59 (s, 2H, H-2′′, 6′′). 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.2 (CH3-Ac × 2), 20.6 (CH3-Ac × 4),
21.1 (CH3-Ac × 2), 37.2 (C-4), 72.4 (C-3), 72.7 (C-2), 108.1
(C-8), 109.9 (C-6), 110.4 (C-4a), 118.8 (C-2′′, 6′′), 122.5 (C-2′,
6′), 126.6 (C-1′′), 134.1 (C-4′), 134.7 (C-1′), 139.3 (C-4′′), 143.4
(C-3′′, 5′′), 143.6 (C-3′, 5′), 150.1 (C-7), 151.9 (C-5), 154.3 (C-
8a), 163.2 (CdO), 166.1 (CdO-Ac), 166.7 (CdO-Ac), 167.4
(CdO-Ac × 2), 167.6 (CdO-Ac × 2), 167.9 (CdO-Ac), 168.5
(CdO-Ac).
P r ep a r a tion of EGCg P er a ceta te (2). EGCg (1 g, 2.18
mmol) (1) was added to a mixture of pyridine (14 mL) and
acetic anhydride (16 mL, 157 mmol) with stirring, and the
mixture was kept for 20 h at 45 °C in an oil bath. The reaction
mixture was then poured into ice-cold water (500 mL) with
vigorous stirring and was left to stand for 1 h to form a white
precipitate. The resulting precipitate was collected by filtration
with a sintered glass funnel (4 G), washed with 500 mL of
chilled water, and dried under reduced pressure. The resulting
product was chromatographed on a column of silica gel 60
(100-210 µm, 25 mm i.d. × 500 mm), with n-hexane/ethyl
acetate (1:3) (solvent A) as the eluent. According to TLC
analysis with solvent A, the fractions containing the compound
showing Rf value of 0.57 were pooled and evaporated to give
the compound 2 (1.7 g, 98.3% yield). The purity of the product
was found to be 99% by analytical HPLC. The analytical HPLC
was performed in a J ASCO liquid chromatograph apparatus
with a J ASCO 870 UV detector. Following are the conditions:
column, CAPCELL PAK C18 UG120 (Shiseido Co., Ltd., 4.6
mm i.d. × 250 mm); mobile phase, 50% aqueous acetonitrile
containing 0.01% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA); flow rate, 1 mL/
min; temperature, 35 °C; detection, UV 280 nm. Full assign-
ments of 1H and 13C NMR spectra were done by heteronuclear
multiple bond correlation (HMBC) and heteronuclear multiple
quantum coherence (HMQC) experiments.
P r ep a r a tion of [4-2H]EGCg (4). The compound 3 (200 mg,
229 µmol) was dissolved in 15 mL of anhydrous methanol, and
then 360 mg of NaB2H4 was added to the solution. After the
solution was gently stirred for 6 h at room temperature, 5%
phosphoric acid (80 mL) was added to the reaction mixture to
terminate the reaction. The resulting mixture was concen-
trated to remove methanol and then was applied to a DIAION
HP-20 (Mitsubishi Chemica Co.) column (20 mm i.d. × 150
mm) that had been equilibrated with distilled water. After
washing with 200 mL of distilled water, the column was eluted
with 100 mL of acetonitrile and the eluent was evaporated to
dryness. The resulting residue was further purified by pre-
parative HPLC. The preparative HPLC conditions were the
same as those for the purification of 3 except for using
acetonitrile/ethyl acetate/0.05% phosphoric acid (12:0.6:90, by
volume) as a mobile phase. The peak with a retention time of
31 min was collected and concentrated to remove organic
solvents. Desalting of the concentrated solution was performed
with the DIAION HP-20 column under the same conditions
as described above. The eluent was evaporated to dryness
under reduced pressure to obtain the compound 4 (55 mg, 52%
yield). The purity of the product was found to be more than
99% by HPLC under the same analytical conditions used for
3 except for using acetonitrile/ethyl acetate/0.05% phosphoric
acid (12:0.6:90, by volume) as a mobile phase. Full assignments
1
EI-MS m/z: 794 (M+). H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.21
(CH3-Ac × 2), 2.23 (CH3-Ac), 2.25 (CH3-Ac), 2.26 (CH3-Ac
× 3), 2.27 (CH3-Ac), 2.98 (dd, 1H, H-4b (provisionally deter-
mined), J ) 2.3, 17.9), 3.04 (dd, 1H, H-4a (provisionally
determined), J ) 4.6, 17.9), 5.16 (br s, 1H, H-2), 5.62 (m, 1H,
H-3), 6.59 (d, 1H, H-8, J ) 2.2 Hz), 6.71 (d, 1H, H-6, J ) 2.2
Hz), 7.24 (s, 2H, H-2′, 6′), 7.60 (s, 2H, H-2′′, 6′′). 13C NMR (125
MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.1-21.1 (CH3-Ac × 8), 25.9 (C-4), 68.0 (C-
3), 76.5 (C-2), 108.1 (C-8), 109.0 (C-6), 109.4 (C-4a), 118.8 (C-
2′′, 6′′), 122.4 (C-2′, 6′), 127.5 (C-1′′), 134.4 (C-4′), 135.1 (C-1′),
139.0 (C-4′′), 143.3 (C-3′′, 5′′), 143.5 (C-3′, 5′), 149.7 (C-7), 149.8
(C-5), 154.8 (C-8a), 163.5 (CdO), 166.2 (CdO-Ac), 166.7 (Cd
O-Ac), 167.4 (CdO-Ac × 2), 167.5 (CdO-Ac × 2), 168.4 (Cd
O-Ac), 168.8 (CdO-Ac).
1
of H and 13C NMR were done by HMBC and HMQC experi-
ments.
Elemental analysis calcd. for C22H17D1O11‚2H2O: C, 53.32%;
H(+D), 4.68%. Found: C, 53.42%; H(+D), 4.63%. FABMS
(positive) m/z: 460 [M+H]+. FABMS (negative) m/z: 458
P r ep a r a tion of 4-Br om o-EGCg P er a ceta te (3). The
compound 2 (1.2 g, 1.51 mmol) was dissolved in carbon
tetrachloride (150 mL) by heating at 60 °C. N-Bromosuccin-
imide (290 mg, 1.63 mmol) and R,R′-azobisisobutyronitrile (3
mg) were added to the solution. The mixture was refluxed for
1 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled to room temperature
and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The
resulting product was chromatographed on a column of silica
gel 60 (100-210 µm, 25 mm i.d. × 500 mm) with solvent A as
the eluent. The aliquot of each fraction was checked by the
same TLC analysis described in the method for the preparation
of 2. The fractions (Rf value of 0.63) were pooled and evapo-
rated to dryness under reduced pressure. For further purifica-
tion, the residue (1.23 g) was dissolved in acetonitrile (3 mL)
and the aliquots (3 × 1 mL) of the solution were subjected to
preparative HPLC. The preparative HPLC was performed with
a CAPCELL PAK C18 UG120 (Shiseido Co., Ltd., 20 mm i.d.
× 250 mm) column in the same HPLC systems described
above. Following are the HPLC conditions: mobile phase, 50%
aqueous acetonitrile containing 0.01% TFA; flow rate, 9.9 mL/
min; temperature, room temperature; detection, UV 280 nm.
The peak with a retention time of 61 min was collected and
1
[M-H]-. H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ 2.82 (d, 1H, H-4, J
) 2.5 Hz), 4.96 (br s, 1H, H-2), 5.52 (dd, 1H, H-3, J ) 1.5, 2.5
Hz), 5.95 (s, 2H, H-6, 8), 6.49 (s, 2H, H-2′, 6′), 6.94 (s, 2H, H-2′′,
6′′). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD): δ 28.1 (C-4), 69.9 (C-3), 78.7
(C-2), 95.9 (C-8), 96.6 (C-6), 99.4 (C-4a), 106.9 (C-2′′, 6′′), 110.3
(C-2′, 6′), 121.5 (C-1′′), 130.9 (C-4′), 133.8 (C-1′), 139.9 (C-4′′),
146.4 (C-3′′, 5′′), 146.7 (C-3′, 5′), 157.3 (C-8a), 157.9 (C-7), 158.0
(C-5), 167.7 (CdO).
P r ep a r a tion of [4-3H]EGCg (5). The compound 3 (10 mg,
11.5 µmol) was dissolved in 0.7 mL of anhydrous methanol,
and then 17 Ci of NaB3H4 (11 mg, 283 µmol) was added. The
reaction mixture was left to stand overnight at room temper-
ature. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was left to stand
for 3 h at room temperature after the addition of NaBH4 (8
mg, 211 µmol). Then the reaction was quenched by the addition
of 5% phosphoric acid (4 mL). The resulting mixture was
concentrated to about half of its original volume in vacuo. The
concentrated solution was extracted four times with ethyl
acetate (3 mL). The combined extracts were washed three
times with distilled water (3 mL) and evaporated to dryness.