S. Quideau et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 7393–7396
7395
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the De´le´gation Re´gionale a` la
Recherche et a` la Technologie pour l’Aquitaine
(FEDER Grant Z0131) and the Conseil Re´gional
d’Aquitaine (Grant 990209003) for financially support-
ing this research. We are also grateful to the Centre de
Recherche en Chimie Mole´culaire (CNRS, Fe´de´ration
d’Unite´s FR1981) for its contribution to the postgradu-
ate fellowships to Daniel K. Whelligan (Cambridge
University, UK) and Matthew A. Looney (Texas Tech
University, USA).
References
1. Quideau, S.; Pouyse´gu, L.; Oxoby, M.; Looney, M. A.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 319–329.
2. Quideau, S.; Pouyse´gu, L. Org. Prep. Proc. Int. 1999, 31,
617–680.
Scheme 4.
3. Barton, D. H. R.; Berge´-Lurion, R.-M.; Lusinchi, X.;
Pinto, B. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 2077–
2080.
4. Varvoglis, A. Hypervalent Iodine in Organic Synthesis;
Academic Press: San Diego, 1997.
5. Varvoglis, A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 1179–1255.
6. Koser, G. F. In The Chemistry of Functional Groups;
Patai, S.; Rappoport, Z., Eds. Hypervalent halogen com-
pounds; Wiley: New York, 1983; pp. 721–811.
7. Stang, P. J.; Zhdankin, V. V. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96,
1123–1178.
8. Quideau, S.; Looney, M. A.; Pouyse´gu, L. Org. Lett.
1999, 1, 1651–1654.
9. Wessely, F.; Sinwel, F. Monatsh. Chem. 1950, 81, 1055–
1070.
10. Bubb, W. A.; Sternhell, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 51,
4499–4502.
11. McKillop, A.; Perry, D. H.; Edwards, M.; Antus, S.;
Farkas, L.; No´gra´di, M.; Taylor, E. C. J. Org. Chem.
1976, 41, 282–287.
12. Ku¨rti, L.; Herczegh, P.; Visy, J.; Simonyi, M.; Antus, S.;
Pelter, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 379–380.
13. Tamura, Y.; Yakura, T.; Haruta, J.-I.; Kita, Y. J. Org.
Chem. 1987, 52, 3927–3930.
14. Braun, N. A.; Ousmer, M.; Bray, J. D.; Bouchu, D.;
Peters, K.; Peters, E.-M.; Ciufolini, M. A. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 4397–4408.
Scheme 5.
15. Quideau, S.; Pouyse´gu, L.; Looney, M. A. J. Org. Chem.
tion–cyclization conditions described here. Heterocy-
clization occurred in a moderate yield of 33% leading to
the indole product 17,23 but not to a dehydroindole like
in the case of the conversion of 7a into 8a (Scheme 2).1
This oxidation of an initially formed dehydroindole
product is concomitant with the reduction of the sec-
ond orthoquinol acetate moiety of 16.
1998, 63, 9597–9600.
16. Lipshutz, B. H.; Papa, P.; Keith, J. M. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 3792–3793.
17. Kita, Y.; Tohma, H.; Kikuchi, K.; Inagaki, M.; Yakura,
T. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 435–438.
18. Wipf, P.; Kim, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5477–5480.
19. Karam, O.; Martin, A.; Jouannetaud, M.-P.; Jacquesy,
J.-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4183–4186.
20. Hoshino, O. In The Alkaloids; Cordell, G. A., Ed. The
Amaryllidaceae alkaloids. Academic Press: New York,
1998; Vol. 51, pp. 323–433.
21. Lewis, J. R. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1998, 15, 107–110.
22. Kametani, T.; Ohkubo, K.; Takano, S. Yakugaki Zasshi
1967, 87, 563–569.
We are now working on elucidating this apparent
intramolecular oxido-reduction process for identifying
reaction conditions that will enable a domino formation
of the nitrogenꢀcarbon and carbonꢀcarbon bonds of
the lycorine-type ABCD tetracyclic system prior to any
rearomatization.