Communications
Organometallics, Vol. 20, No. 10, 2001 1899
36.0) observable in the 31P NMR. Attempts to isolate
any product led only to rapid decomposition, but on
quenching with CO gas, 3 was formed cleanly and im-
mediately in a composition significantly enriched (NMR)
in the less stable anti diastereomer 3-a vs the equilib-
rium ratio (ca. 2.4:1, cf. 4.5:1). Spectral simulations
based on an AA′XX′ spin system (but not AX2 or AXX′)
adequately reproduce the appearance of the δ -9.94
resonance (Figure 1, a), using J AA′ 4.7, J XX′ 11.7, J AX
68.1, J AX′ -24.5, J A′X -27.0, J A′X′ 66.8 Hz (see Figure 1,
b), i.e., are consistent with a cis arrangement of pairs
of hydrogen (A, A′) and phosphorus (X, X′) atoms that
are coplanar (A, X and A′, X′ pairs trans to one another).
Irradiation of the δ -9.94 signal in an NOE-difference
experiment led to enhancement at the SiCH3 and o-C6H5
hydrogen frequencies (i.e., at δ 0.11, 7.8, respectively),
establishing proximity between Ru-H and Si-CH3, i.e.,
a syn relationship of the latter. These data militate
explicitly for an octahedral, anionic structure 4, and
accordingly repetition of the reaction sequence using
1
F igu r e 1. High-field (i.e., low-frequency) region of the H
NMR spectrum for anion 4, generated under conditions
described in the text: (a) observed; (b) simulated (using J
values given in the text); and the H and 31P NMR spectra
of the dideuterio analogue 4-d 2 (c, d) observed; (e, f)
2
simulated.
2
LiAl2H4 led to observation of signals in H and 31P NMR
stereochemical assignments are further supported by
NOE difference measurements,6 which confirm proxim-
ity between H and Me in 3-s (i.e., consistent with its
solid-state geometry) but not in 3-a . The syn isomer
3-s may be obtained free of its anti partner 3-a by
crystallization, or almost so by repeated washing of
the initial product with ethanol then hexanes, but
thereafter in solution slowly reverts to an equilibrium
mixture 3-s/3-a (4.5:1, 295 K; 3.6:1, 318 K).
Reflux (7 h) of the 3-s/3-a mixture with a stoichio-
metric excess of CCl4 in benzene solution yields the
corresponding chloro complex Ru(biPSi)(CO)2Cl (2), as
a mixture7 of two isomers (ca. 1.5:1), of which the major
is that characterized2 previously (i.e., trans). Further
heating in toluene solution (24 h, 95 °C) affords the
diastereomeric monocarbonyl analogue Ru(biPSi)(CO)-
Cl (1), which rapidly takes up mCO (m ) 12 or 13) to
regenerate 2 or its isotopomer 2* (i.e., with m ) 13), as
has been described.2 As was anticipated, subsequent
reactions with LiAlnH4 (n ) 1 or 2; 20 °C, THF solution)
resulted in replacement of chloride by hydride and could
be adapted to regenerate 3 or to obtain each of three
isotopomers (3* and the deuterated analogues 3-d 1,
3*-d 1). By contrast, treatment of 1 with LiAlH4 yielded
an extremely air-sensitive solution showing (reproduc-
ibly, NMR, THF-d8) a single, odd-looking AB-like pat-
tern centered at δ -9.94 in the 1H NMR (high-field
range: see Figure 1, a), which collapsed to a singlet on
irradiation at the frequency of the single resonance (δ
spectra (see Figure 1, c and d) that could both be sim-
ilarly simulated (see Figure 1, e and f) with J AA′ -2.5,
J XX 11.4, J AX 8.4, J AX′ -1.9, J A′X -0.6, J A′X′ 8.6 Hz, i.e.,
′
consistent with the isotopomer all-cis-[Ru2H2(biPSi)-
(CO)]-, 4-d 2.
It is qualitatively obvious from the time required for
3-s, 3-a to equilibrate in solution (hours) that the
diastereomers are separated by a substantial energy
barrier (although they possess comparable thermody-
namic stability: K ) 0.22, 298 K; ∆G°298 ≈ 5 kJ mol-1).
Starting with material that is predominantly syn (3-s),
the change in diastereomer ratio Asyn/Aanti can be
1
followed to equilibrium by using H NMR (integrated
intensity of Ru-H or Si-CH3 signals at tt, from t0 to
t∞). Data so obtained followed rigorously first-order
kinetics behavior, with k1(syn:anti) 5.25 × 10-6, 3.58 ×
10-5, and 1.72 × 10-4 s-1 at 295, 307, and 318 K,
respectively, yielding an excellent straight line fit of ln-
(k/T) vs T-1 (Eyring plot) and the following activation
parameters: ∆Gq295, 102(5) kJ mol-1; ∆Hq295, 113(7) kJ
mol-1; ∆Sq295, 37(2) J K-1 mol-1. Measured rates were
concentration independent and varied <20% in THF vs
toluene. At 295 K, k1 ) 4.36 × 10-6 s-1 for stereomu-
tation of the monodeuterio isotopomer 3-d 1 (i.e., corre-
sponding to kRuH/kRuD ) 1.20). Significantly, incorpora-
tion of external 13CO (1 atm, 99 atom %, benzene
solution, 295 K) into 3-s/3-a was found to be much
slower than the interconversion between the latter, so
that during appropriate experiments only a trace of
label, i.e., through formation of RuH(biPSi)(CO)(13CO)
(3*), accumulated (NMR) over 24 h.
(5) Minor isomer (3-a ): 1H NMR (C6D6) δ 0.52 (SiCH3), -6.73 (t,
RuH, J PH 22.0), (THF-d8) δ 0.08 (SiCH3), -7.06 (t, RuH); 13C NMR
2
(C6D6) δ 7.5 (SiCH3), 20.5 (SiCH2, SiCH2CH2), 32.4 (t, PCH2), 199.0 (t,
The kinetics data establish that the syn:anti stereo-
mutation 3-s:3-a is intramolecular. By contrast with the
rapid, stereoselective label incorporation into 2,2 the rate
of exchange with external 13CO is negligible compared
with k1, effectively ruling out CO dissociation under
the8-10 strong trans influence of the biPSi silyl group
as the pathway to an unsaturated intermediate. In
RuCO, J PC 11.6), 203.9 (t, RuCO, J PC 7.8); 29Si NMR (C6D6) δ -1.1
(t, 2J SiP 11.2); 31P NMR (C6D6) δ 32.9. The Ph hydrogens were observed
as complex multiplets in the δ 7.0-8.0 range; the methylene hydrogens
for 3-a were obscured by those due to 3-s.
2
2
(6) Irradiation of the 1H NMR signals of 3-s at δ 0.38 or -6.30 each
caused significant intensity enhancement of the other, while no similar
effect was observed on irradiating those of 3-a at δ 0.52 or -6.73. The
irradiation at δ -6.30 or -6.73 also led to intensity enhancement at δ
8.10 or 7.95, respectively, and accordingly the corresponding 1H NMR
signals are assigned to Ph ortho hydrogens in 3-s and 3-a .
(7) Minor isomer: IR (KBr disk, cm-1) 1964s, 2012w (νCO); 1H NMR
(8) Auburn, M. J .; Stobart, S. R. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 318.
Gambaro, J . J .; Hohman, W. H.; Meek, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28,
4154. Kapoor, P.; Lo¨vqvist, K.; Oskarsson, Å. Acta Crystallogr. 1995,
C51, 611. Aizenberg, M.; Milstein, D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
6456.
(9) Huang, D.; Streib, W. E.; Bollinger, J . C.; Caulton, K. G.; Winter,
R. F.; Scheiring, T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8087.
(C6D6) δ 0.36 (SiCH3); 13C NMR (C6D6) δ 4.0 (SiCH3), 17.0 (SiCH2),
2
21.2 (SiCH2CH2), 27.8 (t, PCH2), 191.6 (t, RuCO, J PC 10.4), 201.7 (t,
RuCO, 2J PC 11.5); 29Si NMR (C6D6) δ 1.7 (t, 2J SiP 16.0); 31P NMR (C6D6)
δ 13.9. The FAB MS for both 1 and 2 (mixtures of isomers) showed as
the fragment at highest m/z (centered on 627 amu) a polyisotopic
pattern attributable to Ru(biPSi)(CO)+.