was found to be the major reaction product (E+Z ratio 15+85;
60% yield). When the phenolic hydroxy of 12 was protected as
its TBDPS ether 13 (85% yield) and lactone 13 was reduced to
lactol 4 (80% yield), RCM of intermediate 4 furnished the two
stereoisomeric lactols 15 and 16 in a 70+30 E+Z ratio and in
60% yield. The introduction of the sterically demanding
TBDPS protecting group apparently promotes a conformational
change in the transition state of the RCM reaction that favors the
formation of the E-alkene. After deprotection of the silyl ethers
15 and 16, the stereoisomers 3 and 17 (85% yield) were
separated by column chromatography furnishing the desired E-
isomer 3 in 60% yield.
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: (a) sec-BuLi, TMEDA, THF, allyl
bromide, 290 °C to rt, 0.5 h, 46% (based on recovered starting material); (b)
BCl3, (n-Bu)4NI, DCM, 278 °C, 2 h, 80%.
was converted to its corresponding triflate 9, which was reacted
immediately and without purification with a higher order
allylcyanocuprate to provide 10 with inversion of configuration
in 78% yield† (Scheme 2). Deprotection of the acetonide group
was carried out with 70% acetic acid to yield alcohol 11.
Selective oxidation of the anomeric hydroxy group with
Ag2CO3–Celite afforded lactone 6 in excellent yield. The
synthesis of 5 was carried out in a two-step sequence as outlined
in Scheme 3. Ortho-lithiation of O-methylsalicylic acid with
sec-BuLi–TMEDA and quenching the carbanion with allyl
bromide,10 followed by deprotection of the methyl ether using
BCl3–(n-Bu)4NI,14 afforded 5 in moderate overall yield.
Esterification of carbohydrate building block 6 with 5 under
Mitsunobu conditions (Scheme 4) afforded intermediate 12 in
good yield.
Having completed the synthesis of the macrolactone with
correct stereo- and regiochemistry,15 studies directed at in-
troducing the enamide side chain are in progress.
This work was financially supported by the National Cancer
Institute (N01-CM-67259 and RO1 CA84173), and the Drug
Discovery Program of the Higuchi Biosciences Center at the
University of Kansas. B. B. gratefully acknowledges financial
support from predoctoral NIH training grant GM-07775 and the
American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education (AFPE)
for a predoctoral fellowship. F. F. is grateful for an AAPS-
AFPE ‘Gateway’ Research Scholarship for undergraduate
students.
Note added in proof. For a revision of the absolute
configuration of salicylihalamide A through total synthesis, see:
Y. Wu, L. Esser and J. K. Brabander, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2000, 39, 4308.
After the three stereogenic centers had been installed, the
9,10
next step was the RCM reaction to form the D
alkene.
Surprisingly, RCM employing lactone 12 failed to give any of
the desired product. Therefore the lactone functionality of 12
was reduced to lactol 14 (88+12, a+b; 80% yield) using
DIBAL-H at 278 °C. RCM reaction with this substrate
provided the desired reaction product. However, the Z isomer
Notes and references
† All new compounds exhibited satisfactory spectral data in accordance
with their structures. Yields refer to chromatographically pure com-
pounds.
1 K. L. Erickson, J. A. Beutler, J. H. Cardellina II and M. R. Boyd, J. Org.
Chem., 1997, 62, 8188.
2 K. Suzumura, I. Takahashi, H. Matsumoto, K. Nagai, B. Setiawan,
R. M. Rantiatmodjo, K. Suzuki and N. Nagano, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997,
38, 7573.
3 T. C. McKee, D. L. Galinis, L. K. Pannell, J. H. Cardellina II, J. Laakso,
C. M. Ireland, L. Murray, R. J. Capon and M. R. Boyd, J. Org. Chem.,
1998, 63, 7805.
4 K. A. Dekker, R. J. Aiello, H. Hirai, T. Inagaki, T. Sakakibara, Y.
Suzuki and J. F. Thompson, J. Antibiot., 1998, 51, 14.
5 J. W. Kim, K. Shin-ya, K. Furihata, Y. Hayakawa and H. Seto, J. Org.
Chem., 1999, 64, 153.
6 R. Jansen, B. Kunze, H. Reichenbach and G. Höfle, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2000, 913.
7 K. D. Paull, E. Hamel and L. Malspeis, Prediction of Biochemical
Mechanism of Action from the In Vitro Antitumor Screen of the National
Cancer Institute, in Cancer Chemotherapeutic Agents, ed. W. O. Foye,
American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1995.
8 A. Fürstner, G. Seidel and N. Kindler, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 8215.
9 J. T. Feutrill, G. A. Holloway, F. Hilli, H. M. Hugel and M. A.
Rizzacasa, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 8569.
10 J. Mortier and J. Moyroud, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 4042.
11 A. W. M. Lee, W. H. Chan, H. C. Wong and M. S. Wong, Synth.
Commun., 1989, 19, 547.
12 J. J. Patroni and R. V. Stick, Aust. J. Chem., 1978, 31, 445.
13 S. Iacono, J. R. Rasmussen, P. J. Card and B. E. Smart, Organic
Syntheses, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993; Collect. Vol. VII, pp
139.
14 P. R. Brooks, M. C. Wirtz, M. G. Vetelino, D. M. Rescek, G. F.
Woodworth, B. P. Morgan and J. W. Coe, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64,
9719.
15 The results of this study have been reported: B. Blackman, C. J.
Mossman, K. L.Yang, P. T. Flaherty and G. I. Georg, Progress Towards
the Total Synthesis of Salicylihalamide A and B, Abstracts of papers,
219th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, San
Francisco, CA, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 2000,
ORG 808.
Scheme 4 Reagents and conditions: (a) Ph3P, DEAD, THF, 220 °C to 0 °C,
1 h, 85%; (b) TBDPSCl, imidazole, DMF, rt, 1 h, 85%; (c) DIBAL-H, ether,
278 °C, 2 h, 80%; (d) RuCl2NCHPh)(PCy3)2, DCM, reflux, 3 h, 60%; (e)
TBAF, THF, rt, 1 h, 85%.
256
Chem. Commun., 2001, 255–256