R. Ranjbar-Karimi / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 17 (2010) 768–769
769
Table 1
Fluorodesilylation of alkenyltrimethylsilanes.
R1
R2
SiMe3
R3
i or ii
R1
R2
F
R3
1a-i
2a-i
Entry
Products
R1
R2
R3
% Yield
% Yield
% Yield
(time/min)a,e
(time/min)b,e
(time/h)c,e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2j
2h
2i
H
H
H
H
Br
C6H5
Et
H
C6H5
H
H
H
C6H5
H
H
H
H
H
85 (25)
87 (25)
88 (25)
85 (30)
85 (30)
90 (30)
80 (30)
75 (30)
80 (35)
80 (30)
85 (25)
80 (25)
82 (30)
76 (30)
84 (35)
80 (40)
70 (35)
83 (40)
32 (20)d
34 (21)
30 (20)
35 (23)
48 (22)
32 (20)
57 (21)d
45 (22)d
29 (23)
p-MeC6H4
p-ClC6H4
C6H5
C6H5
H
C6H5
n-C6H13
n-C4H9
H
a
b
c
Conditions i: Selectfluor, CH3CN.
Conditions ii: N-fluorobenzensulfonimids, CH3CN.
Selectfluor, CH3CN, stirring at room temperature (without sonication).
According to Ref. [9].
d
e
All compounds were obtained as Z/E mixtures and identified by comparison of their physical and spectral data with those of authentic samples.
F254). Melting points were determined on a Kofler hot-stage
apparatus.
H
SiMe3
F
H
H
F
Cl
H
SiMe3
H
N
Ph
H
Ph
2BF4
N
F
Ph
2.3. General procedure for fluorodesilylation reactions
Conditions i: To a solution of the appropriate alkenyltrimethylsi-
lane compound (2.9 mmol) in dry CH3CN (10 mL) was added
selectfluor (2.9 mmol 1.02 g). The reaction mixture was irradiated
with ultrasound for 25–35 min. The mixture was filtered and
poured into saturated aqueous sodium hydrogen carbonate
(20 ml) and extracted with diethyl ether (2 Â 20). The organic layer
was separated, washed with brine (50 mL), dried over MgSO4, fil-
tered and the solvent was removed. The product was purified on
a silica column eluted with a 1:1 mixture of dichloromethane
and hexane.
Scheme 1. The reaction of 1 to form 2 mechanism.
at room temperature after 20 h [9], whereas under sonication 2a
was obtained in 85% at room temperature within 25 min. In terms
of the mechanism, the reaction of 1 to form 2 might involve an
addition–elimination pathway via a carbocationic intermediate
(Scheme 1).
4. Conclusion
Condition ii: To a solution of the appropriate alkenyltrimethylsi-
lane compound (2.9 mmol) in dry CH3CN (10 mL) was added N-flu-
orobenzensulfonimids (2.9 mmol, 0.68 g). The reaction mixture
was irradiated with ultrasound for 25–40 min. The mixture was fil-
tered and poured into saturated aqueous sodium hydrogen carbon-
ate (20 ml) and extracted with diethyl ether (2 Â 20). The organic
layer was separated, washed with brine (50 mL), dried over MgSO4,
filtered and the solvent was removed. The product was purified on
a silica column eluted with a 1:1 mixture of dichloromethane and
hexane.
In conclusion, the use of ultrasound enabled the easy prepara-
tion of alkenyl fluorides by reaction of corresponding alkenyltrim-
ethylsilanes compounds with electrophilic fluorinating agents. The
advantages of ultrasound in fluorination are shorter reaction times
and higher yields.
Acknowledgement
The author is thankful from Rafsanjan Vali-e-Asr University
(Rafsanjan, Iran) for the partial support of this work.
The authenticity of the products was established by comparing
their melting points with the data in the literature and 1H NMR
spectra.
References
3. Results and discussion
[1] R.E. Banks, J. Fluorine Chem. 87 (1998) 1–17.
[2] P. Butler, B.T. Golding, G. Laval, H. Loghmani-Khouzani, R. Ranjbar-Karimi,
M.M. Sadeghi, Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 11160–11166.
We have utilized the commercially available 1-chloromethyl-4-
fluoro-1,4-diazoniabicyclo[2,2,2]octane bis-tetrafluoroborate (Sele-
ctfluor™, abbreviated Selectfluor) and N-fluorobenzensulfonimids
as fluorinating agents. Table 1 summarizes the yield of the reactions
using these two new methods. The expected fluoroalkenes 2a–i
were obtained as Z/E mixtures in good yields. It is clear that reac-
tions of 1 with these electrophilic fluorinating reagents under ultra-
sonic irradiation are much more selective and have shorter reaction
times. For example, compound 2a (entry 1) was previously pre-
pared in 32% yield in the presence of 1 eq selectfluor in acetonitrile
[3] R.E. Banks, M.K. Besheesh, W. Fraenk, T.M. Klapotke, J. Fluorine Chem. 124
(2003) 229–232.
[4] G. Stavber, M. Zupan, M. Jereb, S. Stavber, Org. Lett. 6 (2004) 4973–4976.
[5] T.J. Mason, Sonochemistry, Oxford Science Publications, London, 1999.
[6] H. Xu, W.-M. Liao, H.-F. Li, Ultason. Sonochem. 14 (2007) 779–783.
[7] K.P. Guzen, A.S. Guarezemini, A.T.G. Orfao, R. Cella, C.M.P. Pereiraa, H.A. Stefani,
Tetrahedron Lett. 48 (2007) 1845–1850, and references cited therein.
[8] M.M. Sadeghi, H. Loghmani-Khouzani, R. Ranjbar-Karimi, B.T. Golding,
Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006) 2455–2458.
[9] B. Greedy, V. Gouverneur, Chem. Commun. 3 (2001) 233–234.
[10] L.A. Paquette, W.E. Fristad, D.S. Dime, T.R. Bailey, J. Org. Chem. 45 (1980) 3017–
3028.