Constituents of Ocimum sanctum with Antistress ActiVity
Journal of Natural Products, 2007, Vol. 70, No. 9 1415
(F004, 99 g), n-butanol (F005, 445.7 g), and aqueous (F006, 270.4 g)
residues, respectively.
+ H]+, 243 [M + Na]+; anal. C 65.41%, H 5.41%, calcd for C12H12O4,
C 65.45%, H, 5.49%.
A portion of the n-butanol-soluble fraction (300 g) was subjected to
column chromatography over silica gel (230–400 mesh, 2.1 kg) and
eluted with a gradient solvent system composed of chloroform–methanol
(95:05) to methanol–water (95:05). Ninety-three fractions (600 mL
each) were obtained, and their composition was monitored by TLC,
with those showing similar TLC profiles grouped into six major
fractions (F-1 to F-6). Fraction F-1 afforded compound 3 (190 mg) by
crystallization from methanol. Further purification of fraction F-2 (30.4
g) over silica gel (230–400 mesh, 300 g), using a gradient solvent
system of CHCl3–MeOH (95 to 50%), afforded 65 fractions (500 mL
each), and these were grouped into seven further fractions (F-7 to F-13)
on the basis of their TLC profiles. Purification of fraction F-7 (1.5 g)
over silica gel (60–120 mesh, 40 g), using CHCl3–MeOH (95:5),
afforded apigenin (40 mg). Compound 4 (445 mg) was obtained as an
amorphous solid from fraction F-4 at room temperature. Column
chromatography of fraction F-9 (6.0 g), over silica gel (230–400 mesh,
160 g), using ethyl acetate saturated with water (isocratic) as mobile
phase, afforded 42 fractions (200 mL each), which were pooled into
five further fractions on the basis of their TLC profiles (F-14 to F-18).
Fraction F-18, containing a mixture of two compounds (300 mg), was
purified over Sephadex LH-20, eluted with water–methanol (1:1) and
resulting in the collection of 55 subfractions, 10 mL in volume.
Subfractions 24–32 yielded 1-O-(ꢀ-D-glucopyranosyl)-(2 S,3S,4R,8Z)-
2-[(2′R)-2′-hydroxydocosanoylamino]-8(Z)-octadecene-1,3,4-triol (35
mg), and subfractions 33–38 yielded 1-O-(ꢀ-D-glucopyranosyl)-
(2S,3S,4R,8Z)-2-[(2′R)-2′-hydroxytetracosanoylamino]-8(Z)-octadecene-
1,3,4-triol (18 mg). Column chromatography of F-10 (4.2 g) over silica
gel (60–120 mesh, 120 g), using ethyl acetate saturated with water as
mobile phase, afforded 31 fractions of 100 mL each, with those showing
similar TLC profiles grouped into five additional fractions (F-19 to
F-23). Further purification of fraction F-20 (700 mg) over silica gel
(230–400 mesh, 20 g) using ethyl acetate saturated with water (isocratic)
as mobile phase afforded apigenin-7-O-ꢀ-D-glucuronic acid 6′′-methyl
ester (40 mg). Purification of fraction F-11 (3.2 g) over silica gel
(230–400 mesh, 90 g) using ethyl acetate saturated with water as mobile
phase afforded a total of 35 fractions, 50 mL in volume. These were
grouped into six major fractions (F-24 to F-29) on the basis of their
TLC profiles. Fraction F-25 (150 mg) was purified by medium-pressure
liquid chromatography on reversed-phase silica gel (RP-18), eluted with
a gradient of MeOH–H2O (1:1) to methanol, to generate 40 subfractions,
15 mL in volume. Subfractions 25–31 gave a yellow, amorphous solid
of luteolin-7-O-ꢀ-D-glucuronic acid 6′′-methyl ester (35 mg). Fraction
F-12 (3.7 g) was rechromatographed over silica gel (230–400 mesh,
100 g), eluted with gradient of ethyl acetate and methanol 95–80%,
and yielded fractions F-30 to F-34. Fraction 34 was kept in a refrigerator
overnight and yielded a further quantity of 1 (62 mg). Column
chromatography of F-22 (1.1 g) using EtOAc–MeOH (95:5) as eluent
over silica gel (100–200 mesh, 25 g) afforded 5 (500 mg). Purification
of F-28 (300 mg) on reversed-phase silica gel (RP-18), eluted with
H2O–MeOH (6:4), afforded 60 fractions, 15 mL in volume. Subfractions
38–45 yielded compound 2 (48 mg). Purification of fraction F-30 (1.2
g) over silica gel (100–200 mesh, 24 g), using a gradient solvent system
of CHCl3–MeOH (95:05) to CHCl3–MeOH (70:30), yielded apigenin-
7-O-ꢀ-D-glucopyranoside (30 mg, fractions 10–15), luteolin-7-O-ꢀ-D-
glucopyranoside (35 mg, fractions 21–29), and luteolin-5-O-ꢀ-D-
glucopyranoside (27 mg, fractions 35–40), respectively.
Acid and Basic Hydrolysis of 1 and 2. Compounds 1 (15 mg,
0.018 mmol) and 2 (10 mg, 0.011 mmol) were separately dissolved in
methanol (3 mL), and NaOMe (5 mg, 0.092 mmol) was added; the
reaction mixtures were stirred at rt for 3 h. The reaction mixtures were
quenched with the acidic ion exchange resin Amberlite IRC-50 (Rohm
and Hass, H+ form), with the resin removed by filtration, and the filtrate
was dried under reduced pressure and partitioned between chloroform
and water. The organic layers from compounds 1 and 2 were analyzed
by GC-MS. The aqueous layer of compound 1 was treated with 2 N
HCl (5 mL) and refluxed for 30 min. The reaction mixture was worked
up in the usual manner and the sugar fraction isolated on an activated
carbon column to give methyl 6-deoxy-6-amino-R-D-glucopyranoside
(2.1 mg), identified by comparison with an authentic sample (TLC)
and by its optical rotation ([R]28D +139 in H2O). The aqueous layer of
2 afforded compound 2a, which had optical rotation [R]29D +83 in H2O
and was identical in all respect to (2R)-1-O-[R-D-galactopyranosyl-
(1′′f6′)-O-ꢀ-D-galactopyranosyl] glycerol.24
Enzymatic Hydrolysis of 1 and 2. Compounds 1 and 2 (2 mg)
were each dissolved in 4 mL of dioxane–H2O (1:1) and treated with
lipase enzyme type III (2 mg, 46 unit, from a Pseudomonas species,
lot 093K0698, Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C, with shaking for 4 h. The
reaction mixtures of compounds 1 and 2 were quenched with 5% AcOH
(1 mL), and the product was dried under reduced pressure. The crude
residues of compounds 1 and 2 were dissolved in water and extracted
with EtOAc, concentrated under reduced pressure, and analyzed by
ESIMS.
Acetylation of Compound 3. Compound 3 (10 mg) was dissolved
in dry pyridine, (2.0 mL) and acetic anhydride (2 mL) was added, with
the reaction mixture left overnight at room temperature. The reaction
mixture was dried under reduced pressure. The crude residue was
dissolved in methanol and cooled, and an amorphous powder of 3a
(13 mg) was obtained: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δH 7.63 (1H, d, J
) 8.0 Hz, H-5), 7.09 (1H, d, J ) 1.2 Hz, H-8), 7.07 (1H, dd, J ) 8.0,
1.2 Hz, H-6), 4.30 (2H, t, J ) 6.6 Hz, CH2OH), 3.06 (2H, t, J ) 6.6
Hz, CH2–CH2OH), 2.33 (3H, s, CH3), 2.46 and 2.02, (3H each, acetoxyl
methyl); FABMS m/z 305 [M + H]+.
Antistress Activity Determination. Animals. Adult male Spra-
gue–Dawley rats (180–200 g) were obtained from the National Animal
Laboratory Centre, CDRI, Lucknow, India. Animals were kept in raised-
mesh-bottom cages to prevent coprophagy in environmentally controlled
rooms (25 ( 2 °C, 12 h light and dark cycle), and animals had free
access to standard pellet chow and drinking water except during
experiments. Experiments were conducted between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.
Experimental protocols were approved by an institutional ethical
committee following the guidelines of CPCSEA (Committee for the
Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals), which
complies with the international norms of INSA (Indian National Science
Academy).
Test Compound Administration. Suspensions of test materials
from O. sanctum in 0.1% sodium carboxymethylcellulose were prepared
and administered orally at a dose of 200 mg/kg (for the ethanol extract
and fractions) once daily for three days and 40 mg/kg (for isolated
compounds) once only, in case of acute stress (AS), and for seven days
in case of chronic unpredictable stress (CUS), 45 min prior to a stress
session. Control animals received an equivalent volume of vehicle for
the same period. After the stress regimen, animals were sacrificed by
decapitation on the seventh day immediately after the last stress session.
A freshly prepared aqueous suspension of the crude powder of ginseng
root, P. quinquifolium, was used as a standard at a dose of 100 mg/kg
body weight and was purchased from Sigma, St. Louis, MO (cat. no.
G7253).
Stress Protocol. The rats were divided into nonstress (NS), AS,
and CUS groups as well as drug-treated groups for both AS and CUS
groups. Each group consists of six rats. In the AS model, on the second
day, after feeding drug or vehicle, animals were fasted overnight with
free access to water. On the third day, 45 min after feeding the drug,
rats were stressed. A parallel group of vehicle-treated rats without
exposure to any kind of stress and maintained under normal conditions,
served as control nonstress group. In the CUS groups the drugs were
fed daily 45 min prior to the stress regime for seven days, with the
rats fasted overnight on the sixth day after completion of the
experimental regimens of drug feeding and stress exposure.
Ocimumoside A (1): white, amorphous powder; [R]29 +50.2 (c
D
0.04, MeOH); UV (c 0.04, MeOH) λmax (log ε) 225 (3.00) nm; IR (KBr)
νmax 3416, 3406, 2910, 1732, 1673 cm-1; CD (c 0.04, MeOH) (∆ε
–3.5) nm; 1H (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) and 13C (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) NMR
spectra, see Table 1; FABMS (positive-ion) m/z 814 [M + H]+, 836
[M + Na]+; anal. C 66.21%, H 11.31%, N 1.73%, calcd for C47H91O9N,
C 66.33%, H 11.26%, N 1.72%.
Ocimumoside B (2): white, hygroscopic solid; [R]29 + 70.0 (c
D
0.04, MeOH); IR (KBr) νmax 3417, 2910, 1737, 1042 cm-1; 1H (DMSO-
d6, 300 MHz) and 13C (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz) NMR spectra, see Table
2; ESIMS (positive ion) m/z 915 [M + Na]+, 910 [M + NH4]+;
HRESIMS m/z [M]+ 892.6143 (calcd for C47H88O15, 892.6123).
Ocimarin (3): brown, amorphous powder; UV (MeOH) λmax (log
ε) 320 (2.61), 204 (2.72) nm; IR (KBr) νmax 3533, 2927, 1720, 1616,
1
1570, 1027 cm-1; H (DMSO-d6, 200 MHz) and 13C (DMSO-d6, 50
MHz) NMR spectra, see Table 3; FABMS (positive-ion) m/z 221 [M