juxtaposed and readily functionalizable biphenyl linkages
(Figure 2) for the preparation of electroactive materials for
Scheme 1. Preparation of Propellane and Its Derivatives
Figure 2. Comparison of (helical) propellane and spiro-bifluorene
platforms for designing electroactive materials.
the applications in the emerging areas of molecular electron-
ics and nanotechnology.4 In this context, it is important to
note that spiro-bifluorene is extensively utilized as a platform
for the preparation of molecular wires that lie orthogonal to
each other at an insulating juncture,5 i.e., Figure 2.
4,4′-positions by reaction with tert-butyl chloride in dichloro-
Before undertaking the exploration of propellane and its
derivatives for the preparation of electroactive materials, one
needs to establish (i) that it is stable toward both reductive
as well as oxidative cleavage of the central C-C bond and
(ii) to demonstrate that it can be readily functionalized at
the 4,4′-positions, i.e., Figure 2.
methane using ferric chloride as a catalyst8 (Scheme 1).
An electron-rich propellane derivative containing methoxy
groups at the 4,4′-positions was also obtained using a similar
strategy as summarized in Scheme 1. Thus, 2,7-dimethoxy-
9-fluorenone9 was subjected to reductive coupling using Zn/
ZnCl2 in THF-H2O followed by an acid-catalyzed re-
arrangement of the resulting pinacol to the corresponding
pinacolone 7 in nearly quantitative yield (Scheme 1). A
reaction of 7 with 4,4′-dimethoxy-2-biphenyllithium10 in
anhydrous ether followed by acid-catalyzed rearrangement/
cyclization of the corresponding carbinol 8 afforded propel-
lane 9 in 53% isolated yield.
Accordingly, herein we present, for the first time, the
structures of propellane and its derivatives by X-ray crystal-
lography and establish that they are stable toward oxidative
degradation by the isolation and X-ray crystallographic
characterization of a stable tri-cation-radical salt of an
electron-rich propellane. Furthermore, we will show that the
parent propellane can be easily brominated at the 4,4′-
positions of all three biphenyls for attachment of various
electroactive groups using standard palladium-catalyzed
coupling reactions.
The molecular structures of 3, 5, 6, and 9 were established
with the aid of 1H/13C NMR spectroscopy (see the Supporting
Information) and were further confirmed by X-ray crystal-
lography as follows.
Thus, parent propellane 3 (or structure A) was obtained
in ∼60% overall yield by a reaction of 2-biphenyllithium
with readily available pinacolone 1 (derived from fluo-
renone)6 followed by an acid-catalyzed Wagner-Meerwein
rearrangement/cyclization of the resulting carbinol 2 (Scheme
1) using a slightly modified procedure of Wittig.1 A similar
reaction with easily available 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2-biphenyl-
lithium7 similarly afforded di-tert-butylated derivative 5 in
75% yield. It is noteworthy that 5 can be easily and
quantitatively de-tert-butylated to produce 3 by a reaction
of 5 in benzene with AlCl3-CH3NO2 as a catalyst7 (Scheme
1). Moreover, both 3 and 5 can be fully tert-butylated at the
The determination of precise molecular structures of
various propellanes by X-ray crystallography (see Figure 3
for a representative structure) established that the central
(aliphatic) C-C bond is only slightly elongated [3, 1.563(2)
Å; 5, 1.572(17) Å; 6, 1.560(3) Å; and 9, 1.564(3) Å] as
compared to the standard value of 1.530 Å for a C(sp3)-
C(sp3) bond.11 It is also noted that the central C-C bonds
in various propellanes are relatively shorter than the average
value of 1.588 Å for the C-C bonds between two tertiary
carbons.11 The observation of relatively normal C-C bond
length in various propellanes as compared to the calculated
C-C bond length of 1.72 Å for hexaphenylethane2 is easily
reconciled by the fact that phenyl groups (due to the linkage
(4) (a) Introduction to Molecular Electronics; Petty, M. C., Bryce, M.
R., Bloor, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, 1995. (b) Maiya,
B. G.; Ramasarma, T. Curr. Sci. 2001, 80, 1523.
(5) (a) Tour, J. M. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 537. (b) Wu, R.; Schumm, J.
S.; Pearson, D. L.; Tour, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6906. (c) Wu, Y.;
Li, J.; Fu, Y.; Bo, Z. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3485 and references therein.
(6) Hoang, M.; Gadosy, T.; Ghazi, H.; Hou, D.-F.; Hopkinson, A. C.;
Johnston, L. J.; Lee-Ruff, E. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7168.
(8) Rathore, R.; Burns, C. L. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4071.
(9) Epperson, J. R.; Bruce, M. A.; Catt, J. D.; Deskus, J. A.; Hodges, D.
B.; Karageorge, G. N.; Keavy, D. J.; Mahle, C. D.; Mattson, R. J.; Ortiz,
A. A.; Parker, M. F.; Takaki, K. S.; Watson, B. T.; Yevich, J. P. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 4601.
(10) Sparling, J.; Fung, D.; Safe, S. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 1980, 7,
13.
(7) Tashiro, M.; Yamato, T. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 3037.
(11) Cambridge Structural Database (CSD).
4092
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 21, 2007