J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3375-3376
2,2′-Bipyridine Ligandoside: A Novel Building Block
3375
for Modifying DNA with Intra-Duplex Metal
Complexes
Haim Weizman and Yitzhak Tor*
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
UniVersity of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California 92093-0358
Figure 1. Schematic representation of an interstrand metal complex
within a DNA double helix (right) and a ligandoside (left).
ReceiVed NoVember 14, 2000
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2,2′-bipyridine Ligandoside and Its
Phosphoramiditea
The structure, dynamics, and recognition properties of the DNA
double helix continue to fascinate chemists. While ingenious and
diverse approaches have been devised to probe the various
surfaces of DNA (e.g., groove binders, metal complexes),1 little
has been done to explore the interior of the helix. This partially
exposed domain is comprised of stacked heterocycles that project
H-bond donors and acceptors into the interior as well as the two
distinct grooves. The ability of this aromatic π-stack to mediate
charge-transfer processes has recently taken center stage2 and
prompted us to consider modification to the DNA core.3 We have
envisioned the placement of charged metal complexes at the center
of the DNA helix as illustrated in Figure 1.4,5
Nucleoside mimics, hereby coined ligandosides, where the
heterocyclic base is replaced by a strong chelator, are key to our
approach (Figure 1).6,7 A ligandoside should meet the following
requirements: (a) Be compatible with standard DNA synthesis;
(b) have higher affinity for metal ions than the heterocyclic bases;
(c) form complexes with comparable dimensions to a DNA base
pair. 2,2′-Bipyridine has been selected as the ligand due to its
high stability and affinity to numerous metal ions.8,9 Modeling
reveals that direct attachment of the bpy to the sugar results in
compression of the duplex upon metal complexation. A methylene
group has therefore been introduced between position 5 of the
ligand and the 2′-deoxy-D-ribose. The saturated methylene bridge
relaxes the ligandoside and results in better fitting of the complex
within the DNA duplex.
a Reagents and conditions: (i) THF, -78 °C, rt 1 h, 72%; (ii)
diethylazodicarboxylate, Ph3P, THF, 3 h, 87%; (iii) BCl3, THF, -78 °C,
1.5 h, 58%; (iv) DMT-Cl, DMAP, Py, 1 h, 80% (mixture of two anomers),
chromatographic resolution; (v) 2-cyanoethyl-N,N,N′,N′-tetraisopropyl-
phophordiamidite, 1H-tetrazole, CH3CN, 1.5 h, 66%.14
the lithiation of 5-methyl-2,2′-bipyridine followed by coupling
with 3,5-Di-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-D-ribofuranose (Scheme 1).12 The
resulting diol 1 is then cyclized by a Mitsunobu reaction13 to give
a 1:1 diastereomeric mixture of the protected ligandoside 2.
Removal of the benzyl groups of 2 by hydrogenolysis failed under
various conditions, but was successfully accomplished using BCl3
to give the free ligandoside 3. Selective protection of the 5′
hydroxyl with 4,4′-dimethoxytrityl facilitated the chromatographic
resolution of the two diastereoisomers. The assignment of their
absolute configuration was based on NOE experiments.14 Phos-
phitylation of the â-anomer provided the ligandoside phosphor-
amidite 5.
While numerous methods for synthesizing aromatic N- and
C-glycosides have been developed,10 synthetic approaches to
aliphatic C-nucleosides are scarce.11 Our approach is based on
(1) Erkkila, K. E.; Odom, D. T.; Barton, J. K. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 2777-
2795. Jamieson, E. R.; Lippard, S. J. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 2467-2498. Kool,
E. T. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1473-1488. Nielsen, P. E. Chem. Eur. J. 1997,
3, 505-508. Waring, M. J. Bailly, C. J. Pharm. Belg. 1997, 52, 70-78.
Trauger, J. W.; Baird, E. E.; Dervan, P. B. Nature 1996, 382, 559-561. Kahne,
D. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 7-12.
(2) Netzel, T. L. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 3, 210-214. Grinstaff, M.
W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3629-3635. Nunez, M. E.; Barton, J.
K. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 199-206. Stemp, E. D. A.; Holmlin, R.
E.; Barton, J. K. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 297, 88-97
(3) Various strategies have been employed for modifying the periphery of
DNA with metal complexes. See, for example: Hurley, D. J.; Tor, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2194-2195. Lewis, F. D.; Helvoigt, S. A.; Letsinger,
R. L. Chem. Commun. 1999, 327-328. Khan, S. I.; Beilstein, A. E.; Grinstaff,
M. W. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 418-419. Rack, J. J.; Krider, E. S.; Meade, T.
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6287-6288
(4) Backbone phosphates may then be envisioned to serve as counteranions.
(5) Hydrophobic nucleoside mimics form surrogate non-hydrogen-bonded
base pairs. See: Kool, E. T.; Morales, J. C.; Guckian, K. M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 991-1009. Ogawa, A. K.; Wu, Y. Q.; McMinn, D. L.; Liu,
J. Q.; Schultz, P. G.; Romesberg, F. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3274-
3287.
The ligandoside (3, Xbpy) was incorporated into DNA oligo-
nucleotides using solid-phase DNA synthesis.14 A self-comple-
mentary 11-mer sequence 6 was synthesized and purified by
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of EDTA.
Enzymatic digestion followed by HPLC analysis confirmed the
presence of the intact ligandoside in the anticipated amount.14
A
10-mer oligonucleotide 7 that has an identical base sequence but
lacks the modified nucleoside was synthesized as a control (Figure
2).
(6) The synthesis of o-phenylenediamine furanoside, a potential metal
binder, has been reported: Tanaka, K.; Shionoya, M. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 5002-5003.
(10) Postema, M. H. D. C-Glycoside Synthesis; CRC Press: Boca Raton,
Florida, 1995. See aslo: Schweitzer, B. A.; Kool E. T. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 7238-7242. Chaudhuri, N. C.; Kool, E. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
1795-1798.
(7) A selective, neutral, and complementary copper-mediated base pair has
been reported: Meggers, E.; Holland, P. L.; Tolman, W. B.; Romesberg, F.
E.; Schultz, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10714-10715.
(8) Constable, E. C. AdV. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 34, 1-63. Kaes, C.; Katz.
A.; Hosseini, M. W. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 3553-3590.
(11) Boal, J. H.; Wilk, A.; Scremin, C. L.; Gray, G. N.; Phillips, L. R.;
Beaucage, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8617-8626.
(12) Wierenga, W.; Skulnick, H. I. Carbohydr. Res. 1981, 90, 41-52
(13) Harusawa, S.; Murai, Y.; Moriyama, H.; Imazu, T.; Ohishi, H.; Yoneda,
R.; Kurihara, T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4405-4411.
(9) The low nucleophilicity of the heterocyclic bpy nitrogens precludes
the need for protecting groups during DNA synthesis.
(14) See Supporting Information for experimental details.
10.1021/ja005785n CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/04/2001