Table 1 Photophysical properties of dendrons 6b/7a and dyads 8a/8b
therefore, prevents a meaningful kinetic analysis of the
intramolecular reaction. On a longer time-scale the fate of the
fullerene singlet excited state is identical to that known for a
fulleropyrrolidine: intersystem crossing, driven by a strong
spin-orbit coupling, governs the transformation (ca. 6.0 3
108 s21) of the singlet into the triplet excited state. The latter
was identified by a long-lived (ca. 20 ms) and strongly
absorbing triplet–triplet maximum (700 nm).
Upon probing more polar THF and benzonitrile, the fullerene
fluorescence in 8b reveals a gradual decrease of up to 50%,
while the dendron emission continued to be almost unchanged
relative to that in toluene. This observation is consistent with an
assumption that implies an energy transfer scenario, which is in
competition with an activated electron transfer. Crucial support
for this competitive synopsis evolves from the fullerene singlet
lifetimes (Table 1), which are, despite the emission quenching,
identical to those of a fulleropyrrolidine in all the solvents
investigated.
8a, on the other hand, reveals much stronger reductions of the
fullerene emission (up to 94%). Most importantly, much shorter
lifetimes of the fullerene singlet excited state, the product of the
initial energy transfer, were seen. This suggests, in sharp
contrast to 8b, a sequential energy and electron transfer starting
from the initially excited dendron. In its final instance this
sequence generates restrictively a radical pair, C60·2–den-
dron·+.
Formation of the charge-separated state was established for
both donor–acceptor systems by means of transient absorption
spectroscopy. The fullerene p-radical anion displayed its typical
near-IR absorption at 1000 nm, while the one-electron oxidized
forms of the donors were evidenced through their absorption in
the visible with lmax ca. 480 nm (8a) and 540 nm (8b). It is
important to note that for the dibutylaniline-containing dyad 8a
the radical pair, with lifetimes of 350 ns and 725 ns, in THF and
benzonitrile, respectively is the sole product, corroborating the
sequence of energy and electron transfer. Quite different is the
situation for the poly(arylenevinylene) derivative 8b: both
energy transfer and electron transfer products were noted as
superimposed spectral features.
6b
7a
8b
8a
Dendron
FFL (toluene)
FFL (THF)
0.47e
1.99e
0.31f
3.15 3 1023e
3.07 3 1023e
2.5 3 1023f
2.2 3 1023f
tFL (toluene)/ns
2.05f
2.01
tsinglet (toluene)/ns 1.97
2DGET°a/eV
1.34
1.49
1.24
1.67
1.42
0.99
la/eV
2DGEnergyT°/eV
Fullerene
FFLb (toluene)
FFLb (THF)
5.4 3 1024
4.0 3 1024
3.0 3 1024
1.51
1.49
1.51
1.42
0.60
0.43
0.30
3.9 3 1024
0.6 3 1024
0.4 3 1024
1.48
1.40
0.16
FFLb (BzCN)
tFLb (toluene)/ns
tsingletc (toluene)/ns
tsingletc (THF)/ns
tsingletc (BzCN)/ns
Ftripletd (toluene)
Ftripletd (THF)
Ftripletd (BzCN)
2DGET°a/eV
0.09
0.29
g
—
g
—
0.10
0.68
a In benzonitrile; radius: (r+) dibutylaniline = 3.7 Å; (r+) naphthalene = 3.5
Å; (r2) fullerene = 4.4 Å; donor–acceptor separation: (rD–A) 8a = 16.7 Å;
(rD–A) 8b = 19.1 Å. b Measured at the 715 nm maximum, excitation at
dendron ground state maximum. c Measured at the 880 nm maximum.
d Measured at the 700 nm maximum. e Measured at the 413 nm maximum;
excitation at 340 nm. f Measured at the 450 nm maximum; excitation at 380
nm. g Radical pair.
fullerene singlet (Fig. 2). Evidence that this energy transfer
indeed takes place, comes from a set of decisive emission and
excitation measurements.
The species evolving from energy transfer, namely, the
fullerene singlet excited state (1.76 eV), has been identified via
the characteristic fluorescence pattern12 of a fulleropyrrolidine
produced in nearly comparable quantum yields. Importantly,
the complementary excitation spectrum of the fullerene emis-
sion in 8a,b is virtually identical with the ground-state
absorption and the excitation spectra of the reference com-
pounds. To further test the above assignment, that is, a rapid
singlet–singlet energy transfer, transient absorption spectros-
copy was deemed necessary. Despite the unequivocal and
nearly quantitative excitation (355 nm) of the dendrimer
moieties no spectral evidence for the dendrimer’s singlet–
singlet absorption (ca. 650 nm) was found after the 18 ps laser
pulse. Instead the spectral features are identical with the texture
of the fullerene singlet excited state. Specifically, a character-
istic maximum at 880 nm is a clear attribute of the fullerene
singlet–singlet absorption. The rise time of the 880 nm
absorption, representing the actual energy transfer event in
8a,b, is, however, masked by the instrument response time and,
This work has been supported by the DGESIC of Spain
(Project PB98-0818) and by the European Comission (Contract
JOR3CT980206). Part of this work has been supported by the
Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the US Department of
Energy. This is document NDRL-4286 from the Notre Dame
Radiation Laboratory.
Notes and references
1 M. R. Wasielewski, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 435; M.-J. Blanco, M. C.
Jiménez, J.-C. Chambron, V. Heitz, M. Linke and J.-P. Sauvage, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 1999, 28, 293.
2 W. F. J. Vermaas, Science, 1994, 263, 1511; M. A. Stefen, K. Q. Lao and
S. G. Boxer, Science, 1994, 264, 810.
3 M. A. Fox and M. Chanon, Photoinduced Electron Transfer, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 1988.
4 M. H. B. Stowell, T. M. McPhillips, D. C. Rees, S. M. Soltis, E. Abresch
and G. Feher, Science, 1997, 276, 812.
5 For a review on light-harvesting dendrimers, see: A. Adronov and
J. M. J. Fréchet, Chem. Commun., 2000, 1701.
6 A. Adronov, S. L. Gilat., J. M. J. Frechet, K. Ohta, F. V. R. Neuwahl and
G. R. Fleming, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 1175 and references
therein.
7 J.-F. Nierengarten, Chem. Eur. J., 2000, 6, 3667.
8 Z. Xu and J. S. Moore, Acta Polym., 1994, 45, 83; C. Devadoss, P.
Bharathi and J. S. Moore, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 9635; A. G.
Avent, P. R. Birkett, F. Paolucci, S. Roffia, R. Taylor and N. K.
Wachter, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2000, 1409.
9 (a) S. K. Deb, T. M. Maddux and L. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119,
9079; (b) H. Meier and M. Lehmann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1998, 37,
643.
10 G. J. Bodwell, J. N. Bridson, T. J. Houghton and B. Yarlagadda,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 7475.
11 M. Prato and M. Maggini, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 519.
12 D. M. Guldi and M. Prato, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 695.
Fig. 2
708
Chem. Commun., 2001, 707–708