metal-organic compounds
Ê
and the double bond (1.87 A) values, resulting from substan-
Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (A, ).
ꢁ
Ê
tial delocalization of electrons throughout the two NiS2P four-
membered rings. This is similar to that found for analogous dtp
complexes, e.g. [Ni{(C2H5O)2PS2}2(C9H7N)2] (Huang et al.,
1995), [Ni{(C4H9O)2PS2}2(py)2] (Liu et al., 1987), [Ni{(C4H9-
O)2PS2}2(bipy)] and [M2{(i-C3H7O)2PS2}4], M = Zn or Cd
(Byrom et al., 2000).
NiÐN1
NiÐN2
NiÐS2
NiÐS4
NiÐS1
NiÐS3
S1ÐP1
2.082 (3)
2.086 (3)
2.486 (1)
2.488 (1)
2.505 (1)
2.532 (1)
1.976 (1)
S2ÐP1
S3ÐP2
S4ÐP2
O1ÐC13
O2ÐC20
O3ÐC27
O4ÐC34
1.977 (1)
1.965 (1)
1.972 (1)
1.417 (4)
1.406 (4)
1.398 (4)
1.405 (4)
The CÐO distances are much shorter than those found in
Ê
[Ni{(C2H5O)2PS2}2(C5H6N2)2] [1.446 (5) and 1.430 (5) A].
This is probably a result of the electronic effect of the benzene
rings.
N1ÐNiÐN2
S2ÐNiÐS1
S4ÐNiÐS3
79.8 (1)
81.13 (3)
81.57 (3)
S1ÐP1ÐS2
S3ÐP2ÐS4
110.37 (6)
112.81 (5)
The SÐNiÐS bond angles (Table 1) are similar to those
found in [Ni{(C4H9O)2PS2}2(bipy)] [81.40 (7) and 81.63 (7)ꢁ].
The N1ÐNiÐN2 bond angle (Table 1) is also similar to that
found in [Ni{(C4H9O)2PS2}2(bipy)] [79.5 (2)ꢁ].
The phen ligand and Ni atom are also coplanar; the mean
After checking their presence in the difference map, all H atoms
were geometrically ®xed and allowed to ride on their attached atoms
(CH3 with AFIX 137 in SHELXTL).
Ê
Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996); cell re®nement: SAINT
(Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SAINT and SADABS (Sheldrick,
1996); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick,
1997); program(s) used to re®ne structure: SHELXTL; molecular
graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publi-
cation: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 1990).
deviation from the best plane is 0.065 (1) A. The two planes
Ê
through Ni, P and S2 form a dihedral angle of 89.18 (4) A. The
dihedral angles between the plane of the phen ligand and
Ê
these two NiS2P planes are 89.21 (7) and 74.92 (7) A. This
indicates that the structure of NiN2S4 is obviously a distorted
octahedron.
The authors would like to thank the Malaysian Government
and Universiti Sains Malaysia for research grant R&D No.
305/PFIZIK/610942.
Experimental
The title compound was prepared by mixing a solution of nickel(II)
bis(O,O0-di-p-tolyldithiophosphate) (0.1 mmol) in acetone (50 ml)
and phen (0.1 mmol) with heating. The solution was cooled to room
temperature and was then ®ltered. Green prismatic single crystals
suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained upon slow evaporation of
the solvent.
Supplementary data for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic
archives (Reference: SK1464). Services for accessing these data are
described at the back of the journal.
Crystal data
References
[Ni(C14H14O2PS2)2(C12H8N2)]
Mr = 857.60
Triclinic, P1
Z = 2
Dx = 1.401 Mg m
Mo Kꢀ radiation
Arca, M., Cornia, A., Devillanova, F. A., Fabretti, A. C., Isaia, F., Lippolis, V. &
Verani, G. (1997). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 262, 81±84.
Barton, J. K. (1986). Science, 233, 727±734.
Byrom, C., Malik, M. A., O'Brien, P., White, A. J. P. & Williams, D. J. (2000).
Polyhedron, 19, 211±215.
Chen, H. W. & Fackler, J. P. Jr (1978). Inorg. Chem. 17, 22±26.
Harrison, P. G. & Kikabhai, T. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 4, 807±813.
Hoskins, B. F. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (1985). Acta Cryst. C41, 322±324.
Huang, X. Y., Xiong, R. G., Dong, J. X. & You, X. Z. (1995). Acta Cryst. C51,
598±600.
3
Ê
a = 11.1819 (2) A
Cell parameters from 8192
re¯ections
Ê
b = 12.0934 (2) A
c = 17.2860 (2) A
ꢃ = 1.3±28.3ꢁ
ꢄ = 0.80 mm
T = 293 (2) K
Ê
1
ꢀ = 107.693 (1)ꢁ
ꢁ = 96.349 (1)ꢁ
ꢂ = 109.896 (1)ꢁ
Prismatic slab, green
0.40 Â 0.24 Â 0.16 mm
3
Ê
V = 2033.41 (5) A
Kovtun, G. A., Zhukovskaya, G. B., Kratko, G. A. & Sukhoveev, V. V. (1992).
Neftepererab. Neftekhim. (Kiev), 43, 39±41.
Liu, S. X., Lin, C. C., Xu, Z., Yu, Y. P. & You, X. Z. (1987). Chin. J. Org. Chem.
5, 369±373.
Naing, K., Takahashi, M., Taniguchi, M. & Yamagishi, A. (1995). Inorg. Chem.
34, 350±356.
Data collection
Siemens SMART CCD area-
detector diffractometer
! scans
Absorption correction: empirical
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin = 0.739, Tmax = 0.882
11570 measured re¯ections
7040 independent re¯ections
5007 re¯ections with I > 2ꢅ(I)
Rint = 0.055
ꢃ
max = 25.0ꢁ
h = 12 ! 13
k = 14 ! 11
È
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Gottingen, Germany.
l = 20 ! 19
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXTL. Version 5.1. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison,
Wisconsin, USA.
Siemens (1996). SMART and SAINT. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments
Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Spek, A. L. (1990). Acta Cryst. A46, C-34.
Intensity decay: negligible
Re®nement
Re®nement on F2
R[F2 > 2ꢅ(F2)] = 0.048
wR(F2) = 0.120
S = 0.93
7040 re¯ections
482 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
w = 1/[ꢅ2(Fo2) + (0.0346P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
(Á/ꢅ)max = 0.001
Xiong, R. G., Liu, C. M., Zuo, J. L., Li, H. Z., You, X. Z., Fun, H. K. &
Sivakumar, K. (1997). Polyhedron, 16, 2315±2319.
You, X. Z., Xiong, R. G., Dong, J. X. & Huang, X. Y. (1994). Polyhedron, 13,
2763±2765.
You, X. Z., Xu, Z., Yu, Y. P., Liu, S. X. & Lin, C. C. (1986). J. Struct. Chem. 5,
154±158.
3
Ê
Áꢆmax = 0.40 e A
3
Ê
0.77 e A
Áꢆmin
=
ꢀ
718 Qingli Hao et al.
[Ni(C14H14O2PS2)2(C12H8N2)]
Acta Cryst. (2001). C57, 717±718