Scheme 3. Preliminary Results of the Cyclization Reaction
Table 1. Optimization of Cyclization Reaction
23 +
entry
1
19
conditions
24/%a
4R*,6R*,18R* 1. KOtBu (2 equiv), -78 °C, 1 h
2. 20 (3 equiv), -78 °C, 1 h
15
3. KOtBu (2.1 equiv), -78 °C to rt, 16 h
4R*,6R*,18R* 1. KOtBu (2.1 equiv), -78 °C, 1 h
2. LiBr (2.5 equiv), -78 °C, 1 h
2
3
16
3. 20 (1.5 equiv), -78 °C to rt
4. DMAP (3 equiv), -78 °C to rt, 16 h
4R*,6R*,18R* 1. KOtBu (2.1 equiv) -78 °C, 1 h
2. LiBr (3 equiv), -78 °C, 1 h
40
3. 20 (3 equiv), -78 °C, 3 h
4. DMAP (6 equiv), 12-crown-4,
(6 equiv) -78 °C to rt, 36 h
4
4R*,6R*,18R* 1. KOtBu (3 equiv), -78 °C, 100 min
2. LiClO4 (4.5 equiv), -78 °C, 50 min
3. 20 (2 equiv), -78 °C, 5.5 h
76
(25:1)b
of R-protons, determined the position of the deprotonation,
and sterically less hindered C-4 was selectively deproto-
nated.14 Isolated 21 was then treated with a second base
(KOtBu or KHMDS); however, no cyclization occurred,
probably due to the trans geometry of the carbon-carbon
double bond (Scheme 3, (1)). On the other hand, when the
crude mixture was treated with KOtBu, cyclized compounds
23 + 2415 were obtained, albeit in low yield (20%) (Scheme
3, (3)). Although 23 + 24 (O-acylated compounds) were not
the compounds we initially expected (i.e., C-6-acylated
compound), there was a great possibility of accessing the
desired bicyclic system from these compounds. We rational-
ized the partial success of the cyclization as follows: because
of the side reaction of the Claisen condensation, the crude
mixture should contain a p-nitrophenol, which could perform
a conjugate addition to the R,â-unsaturated ester part of 21
(+ diastereomer) in the presence of a base in the cyclization
step. This should make the activated ester accessible to the
nucleophilic oxygen atom, and O-acylation followed by
elimination of the p-nitrophenoxide should give unsaturated
lactones 23 + 24. Consistent with this rationale, 23 was
obtained in ca. 20% yield from isolated 21, when p-
nitrophenol was added to the reaction mixture of the
cyclization step (Scheme 3, (2)).
These promising results prompted us to investigate the
possibility of one-pot cyclization from 19 (Table 1). Detect-
ing the formation of 21 on TLC after the first step, KOtBu
was then added and the reaction temperature was allowed
to rise to room temperature (entry 1). This one-pot procedure
gave the target bicyclic compounds in 15% yield, which was
only slightly worse than the two-step procedure. Tracing the
reaction by TLC indicated that the low yield of 23 + 24
should be attributed to the first Michael addition-elimination
step, possibly due to the high nucleophilicity of the potassium
enolate. Therefore, we planned to convert the initially formed
potassium enolate to a milder nucleophile by transmetalation.
Although transmetalation to the zinc enolate with ZnCl2 did
4. DMAP (5 equiv), 12-crown-4
(6 equiv), -78 °C to rt, 30 h
5
6
4S*,6S*,18R* same as entry 4
63
(5:1)b
71
4R*,6R*,18R* same as entry 4
+
(11:1)b
4S*,6S*,18R*
a Isolated yield after purification. b Ratio of 23:24.
not give the initial product 21, the lithium enolate formed
through the transmetalation with LiBr gave a clean conver-
sion to 21.16 This time, however, the second cyclization step
became problematic due to the lower nucleophilicity of the
lithium enolate at C-6 compared to the potassium enolate,
even in the presence of DMAP as an activating reagent of
the electrophile (entry 2). To improve the nucleophilicity of
the C-6 lithium enolate for the cyclization, we added 12-
crown-4 and the yield of 23 + 24 improved to 40% (entry
3). Transmetalation with LiClO4, instead of LiBr, gave 23
+ 24 in a much higher yield of 76% (entry 4). Although
predominant isomer 23 was the unnatural one (18-epi), this
one-pot cyclization is useful for the synthesis of the epi-
form.17 This reaction was also applicable to the other
diastereomer 19 (4S*,6S*,18R*), and 23 + 24 were obtained
in 63% yield with a ratio of 5:1, again with 23 as the major
isomer (entry 5).18 Finally, even using a mixture (1.3:1) of
19 (4R*,6R*,18R*) and 19 (4S*,6S*,18R*), 23 + 24 were
obtained in 71% yield (23:24 ) 11:1), which greatly
simplified the synthetic route.
With lactone 23 at hand, the next task was to convert the
lactone to the [3.3.1] bicyclic system (Scheme 4). The results
described above suggested that it was necessary to use a
softer electrophile, such as an aldehyde, instead of a hard
(16) Direct formation of the lithium enolate with LiOtBu failed due to
the lower basicity of the base.
(17) Preliminary studies to reverse the stereoselectivity of this one-pot
cyclization revealed that employing a cyclic carbonate for the protecting
group of the diol instead of the acetonide gave an ca. 1:1 mixture of
diastereomers. Although the origin of the high stereoselectivity in the case
of acetonide-protected 19 is not clear, coordination of the 18-oxygen atom
to the lithium atom of the enolate might fix the substrate conformation to
block the entry of the electrophile from the â-side.
(14) The possibility that the reaction proceeded through a dianion could
be excluded because the reaction using 1.2 equiv of KOtBu under the
optimized conditions (see below) gave 23 + 24 in 43% yield.
(15) The structure of 23 was unequivocally determined by X-ray
crystallography. See Supporting Information for details.
(18) These results indicated that the observed high stereoselectivity was
derived from the C-18 configuration.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 5, 2002
861