´
J. Prust, K. Most, I. Müller, A. Stasch, H. W. Roesky, I. Uson
FULL PAPER
Preparation of 3: Compound 2 (2.50 g, 5.01 mmol) in Et2O (20 mL) The structures were solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97[10]
was added to a suspension of MnI2 (1.54 g, 5.01 mmol) in Et2O
(20 mL) at Ϫ78 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at Ϫ78 °C for
an additional 10 min. and allowed to warm to room temperature.
After stirring the pink solution overnight the color changed to yel-
low. The yellow solution was filtered and the solvent removed un-
der reduced pressure to a volume of 10 mL. Yellow crystals were
obtained after 1 day at Ϫ24 °C. (3.75 g, 85% yield).[8] Ϫ MS (EI):
and refined against F2 on all data by full-matrix least-squares with
SHELXL-97.[11] All non-hydrogen atoms were refined aniso-
tropically. The hydrogen atoms were included in the model at geo-
metrically calculated positions and refined using a riding model.
The hydrogen atoms on C(10) in the structures of 4 and 5, however,
were refined as an idealized disordered methyl group with two half-
occupied positions related to one another by a rotation of 60°.
m/z (%) ϭ 202 (47) [DippNCCH3], 599 (100) [NacNacMnI]. Ϫ IR These hydrogen atoms were allowed to ride on the carbon atom
(Nujol): ν˜ ϭ 1655 (m), 1625 (m), 1262 (m), 1079 (s), 793 (s), 290 and rotate about the C(10)ϪC(1) bond. In all three structures the
(m) cmϪ1. Ϫ C37H61I2LiMnN2O2 (881.58): C 50.41, H 6.97, N 3.18; disordered methyl group of one of the diethyl ether molecules was
found C 50.43, H 6.89, N 3.23.[7]
modeled with the help of similarity restraints for 1Ϫ2 and 1Ϫ3
distances and displacement parameters. In all three structures there
are residual electron density maxima near the iodine atoms and
Li(1), presumably due to disorder which could not be modeled.
This unmodeled disorder could play a role in the apparently dis-
torted geometry at Li(1).
Preparation of 4: Compound 2 (1.26 g, 2.54 mmol) in Et2O (20 mL)
was added to a suspension of ZnI2 (811 mg, 2.54 mmol) in Et2O
(20 mL) at Ϫ78 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to
room temperature and stirred for an additional 24 h. The solution
was filtered and the solvent removed under reduced pressure to a
volume of 5 mL. Colorless crystals were obtained after 4 days at 2
Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the struc-
tures included in this paper have been deposited with the Cam-
bridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication
nos. CCDC 154416 (3), CCDC 154417 (4), CCDC 154418 (5). Cop-
ies of the data can be obtained free of charge on application to
CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK [Fax: (internat.)
ϩ 44-1223/336-033; Email: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk].
1
°C. (1.79 g, 79% yield).[8] Ϫ H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6): δ ϭ 1.05
(t, J ϭ 6.8 Hz, 12 H, CH3CH2O), 1.14 [d, J ϭ 6.8 Hz, 12 H,
CH(CH3)2], 1.36 [d, J ϭ 6.8 Hz, 12 H, CH(CH3)2], 1.68 (s, 6 H,
CH3), 3.20 (t, J ϭ 6.8 Hz, 12 H, CH3CH2O), 3.51 [sept., J ϭ
6.8 Hz, 4 H, CH(CH3)2], 4.86 (s, 1 H, CH), 7.13 (m, 6 H, ArH). Ϫ
13C NMR (125 MHz, C6D6): δ ϭ 23.3 (s), 24.3 (s), 24.5 (s), 27.8
(s), 28.9 (s), 97.0 (s), 123.6 (s), 123.7 (s), 124.7 (s), 125.3 (s), 125.9
(s), 126.9 (s), 143.9 (s), 171.2 (s). Ϫ MS (EI): m/z (%) ϭ 202 (100)
[DippNCCH3], 608 (47) [NacNacZnI]. Ϫ IR (Nujol): ν˜ ϭ 1701 (m),
1615 (s), 1465 (m), 1412 (m), 1255 (s), 1054 (s), 763 (m), 243 (m)
cmϪ1. Ϫ C37H61I2LiN2O2Zn (892.03): C 49.82, H 6.89, N 3.14;
found C 49.60, H 6.61, N 3.59.
Acknowledgments
The financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
and Göttinger Akademie der Wissenschaften is gratefully acknow-
ledged.
Preparation of 5: Compound 2 (1.00 g, 2.01 mmol) in Et2O (20 mL)
was added to a suspension of CdI2 (733 mg, 2.01 mmol) in Et2O
(20 mL) at Ϫ78 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to
room temperature and stirred for an additional 36 h. After filtra-
tion from the residue the solvent was removed under reduced pres-
sure to a volume of 10 mL. Colorless crystals were obtained after
6 days at 2 °C. (1.45 g, 77% yield).[8] Ϫ 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6):
δ ϭ 1.02 (t, J ϭ 6.8 Hz, 12 H, CH3CH2O), 1.12 [d, J ϭ 6.8 Hz, 12
H, CH(CH3)2], 1.33 [d, J ϭ 6.8 Hz, 12 H, CH(CH3)2], 1.63 (s, 6 H,
CH3), 3.21 (t, J ϭ 6.8 Hz, 12 H, CH3CH2O), 3.44 [sept., J ϭ
6.8 Hz, 4 H, CH(CH3)2], 4.81 (s, 1 H, CH), 7.11 (m, 6 H, ArH). Ϫ
13C NMR (125 MHz, C6D6): δ ϭ 23.4 (s), 24.1 (s), 24.4 (s), 27.9
(s), 28.6 (s), 28.9 (s), 96.8 (s), 123.5 (s), 123.7 (s), 124.8 (s), 125.2
(s), 125.8 (s), 127.1 (s), 145.4 (s), 170.0 (s). Ϫ MS (EI): m/z (%) ϭ
202 (100) [DippNCCH3], 417 (52) [NacNac], 658 (58) [Nac-
NacCdI]. Ϫ IR (Nujol): ν˜ ϭ 1732 (m), 1440 (m), 1406 (s), 1268 (s),
1021 (m), 759 (s), 435 (m) cmϪ1. Ϫ C37H61CdI2LiN2O2 (939.05): C
47.32, H 6.55, N 2.98; found C 46.89, H 6.32, N 2.77.
[1]
[1a] J. E. Parks, R. H. Holm, Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 1408Ϫ1416.
[1b]
Ϫ
S. G. McGeachin, Can. J. Chem. 1968, 46, 903Ϫ912.
[2]
[3]
J. Feldman, S. J. McLain, A. Parthasarathy, W. J. Marshall, J.
Calabrese, S. D. Arthur, Organometallics 1997, 16, 1514Ϫ1516.
[3a] W. K. Kim, M. J. Fevola, L. M. Liable-Sands, A. L. Rhein-
gold, K. H. Theopold, Organometallics 1998, 17, 4541Ϫ4543.
[3b]
Ϫ
V. C. Gibson, P. J. Maddox, C. Newton, C. Redshaw,
G. A. Solan, A. J. P. White, D. J. Williams, Chem. Commun.
1998, 1651Ϫ1652.
[4] [4a]
[4b]
N. Kuhn, M. Speis, Inorg. Chim. Acta 1988, 145, 1. Ϫ
B. X. Qian, D. L. Ward, M. R. Smith, III, Organometallics
[4c]
1998, 17, 3070Ϫ3076. Ϫ
N. Kuhn, J. Fahl, S. Fuchs, M.
Steinmann, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1999, 625, 2108Ϫ2114.
C. Cui, H. W. Roesky, H.-G. Schmidt, M. Noltemeyer, H. Hao,
F. Cimpoesu, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 4444Ϫ4446; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4274Ϫ4276.
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
V. C. Gibson, J. A. Segal, A. J. P. White, D. J. Williams, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7120Ϫ7121.
NMR spectroscopic data for 4 were not available due to the
paramagnetism of MnII.
According to the elemental analysis of a sample that was
treated at 180 °C an appreciable decomposition was already
observed at this temperature.
X-ray Crystallography: Crystals of 3 (mol. wt. 881.58), 4 (892.03),
and 5 (939.05) were grown from a concentrated Et2O solution
cooled to Ϫ24 °C (3) or 2 °C (4, 5). They crystallized in the triclinic
[9]
T. Kottke, D. Stalke, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993, 26, 615Ϫ619.
G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-90/96, Program for Structure Solu-
tion, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1990, 46, 467Ϫ473.
G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-93/96, Program for Structure Re-
finement, Universität Göttingen, 1993.
¯
crystal system with space group P1. Relevant details and data stat-
[10]
istics are summarized in Table 1. The crystals were mounted on a
glass fiber in a rapidly cooled perfluoropolyether.[9] Diffraction
data were collected on a StoeϪSiemensϪHuber four-circle dif-
fractometer coupled to a Siemens CCD area detector at 133(2) K,
[11]
Received December 14, 2000
˚
with graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα radiation (λ ϭ 0.71073 A).
[I00472]
1616
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 1613Ϫ1616