or a hybrid exo/endo process following Warren’s terminol-
ogy.24,25 Herein, we report our initial results in investigating
control elements for regiospecific intramolecular cyclization
of methylene-interrupted epoxydiols. With the appropriate
choice of the pendant functional group (X, Scheme 2) and
reaction conditions, we have been able to access different
reaction pathways to secure regioisomeric THF and THP
rings.
Scheme 1. Proposed Biosynthesis of AA-THF-diols
2-Deoxy-D-ribose was utilized as the entry point to obtain
the common structural motif represented in 1. Epoxydiol
precursors (5a-g) were synthesized using routine transfor-
mations (see Supporting Information for details). Table 1
lists the results obtained upon treatment of 5a-g with various
acidic conditions. Exposure of these compounds to both
protic acid (AcOH:H2O:THF (6:3:1)) and Lewis acid (BF3‚
Et2O) led to selective desilylation of the TMS ether protecting
groups and intramolecular epoxide opening in the same step.
The cyclization products were peracetylated for ease of NMR
characterization, and their structures were established by 2D-
COSY and NOE experiments.
On the basis of the better alignment of the newly forming
and rupturing bonds23 and the electron-withdrawing inductive
effect of the pendant groups (except alkyl group in 5d), we
expected that the 5-exo cyclization (path a, Scheme 2) would
be favored for compounds 5a,b,d,e. As shown in Table 1,
the expected 5-exo product was obtained in each of these
cases as a single diastereomer. Complete stereochemical
inversion was observed at C-2, which is consistent with a
concerted mechanism of epoxide opening. The same regio-
selectivity of epoxide opening was observed with the
diastereomer of 5a (epimeric at both epoxidic carbons), thus
indicating that the stereochemical relationship between the
diol and the epoxide is not of any consequence for this
system.
as the recently discovered nonclassical acetognins, containing
such trisubstituted THF motifs.11-14
A commonly used approach for the synthesis of substituted
cyclic ether units is the intramolecular epoxide opening, first
reported by Kishi.15,16 Most systems studied in this context
have a single hydroxyl group acting as the nucleophile;17-22
however, epoxydiols such as 1 where both hydroxyl groups
can participate in the cyclization event (paths a, b, and c,
Scheme 2) have not been studied. Path a is the typical 5-exo
Scheme 2. Possible Modes of Cyclization (See Ref 25 for
Definitions of Hybrid Nomenclature in Parentheses)
Compound 5c with the olefinic appendage was designed
in order to stabilize a developing positive charge at C-1
during activation and epoxide opening, thus leading to the
5-endo product 7c (path b, Scheme 2). This strategy has been
successfully used by others with monohydroxy epoxy
systems.17,21,22 We examined the possibility of extending the
same idea to our epoxydiol system to selectively generate
2,3,5-trisubstituted THF units. Treatment of 5c with
BF3‚Et2O led to the isolation of 7c after peracetylation via
the 5-endo pathway, thus securing a regiochemically distinct
trisubstituted THF unit. Interestingly, cyclization of 5c with
aqueous acetic acid yielded only THP 8c (Table 1) via the
6-endo route (path c, Scheme 2).
ring opening process. Paths b and c (Scheme 2) can be
labeled as endo processes based on Baldwin nomenclature23
(11) Alali, F. Q.; Liu, X.-X.; McLaughlin, J. L. J. Nat. Prod. 1999, 62,
504.
(12) Capon, R. J.; Barrow, R. A.; Rochfort, S.; Jobling, M.; Skene, C.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 2227.
Cyclization of 5c was also triggered with 10% aqueous
HCl in THF (9:1). THP 8c was again obtained as the sole
product in 75% yield, indicating that the strength of the
aqueous acid is not the determining factor in the process.
(13) Kempf, A. J.; Wilson, K. E.; Hensens, O. D.; Monaghan, R. L.;
Zimmerman, S. B.; Dulaney, E. L. J. Antibiot. 1986, 39, 1361.
(14) Robinson, N.; Gibson, T. M.; Chicarelli-Robinson, M. I.; Cameron,
L.; Hylands, P. J.; Wilkinson, D. J. Nat. Prod. 1997, 60, 6.
(15) Nakata, T.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 31, 2745.
(16) Nakata, T.; Schmid, G.; Vranesic, M.; Okigawa, M.; Smith-Palmer,
T.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2933.
(17) Evans, P. A.; Murthy, V. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1235.
(18) Fujiwara, K.; Tokiwano, T.; Murai, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
8063.
(19) Fujiwara, K.; Mishima, H.; Amano, A.; Tokiwano, T.; Murai, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 393.
(20) Mukai, C.; Ikeda, Y.; Sugimoto, Y.; Hanaoka, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1994, 35, 2179.
(21) Nicolaou, K. C.; Prasad, C. V. C.; Somers, P. K.; Hwang, C. K. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5330.
(22) Nicolaou, K. C.; Prasad, C. V. C.; Somers, P. K.; Hwang, C. K. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5335.
(23) Baldwin, J. E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 734.
(24) McIntyre, S.; Warren, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 3457.
(25) A hybrid notation of Baldwin’s terminology, used by Warren and
co-workers, and relevant to our work is included in the Supporting
Information.
2490
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 16, 2001