B. L. Palucki et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 1993–1996
Table 3. Covalent binding to rat liver microsomal proteinsa
1995
Table 1. Binding affinity and selectivity of compounds for the human
melanocortin subtype-4 receptora
Compound
+ NADPH (pmol equiv/mg protein)
b
IC50 (nM)
Compds
MC4R
MB243
8
2153 266b
50
MC3R/4R
MC5R/4R
10
11
30
107
103
216
a-MSH
8
19
6
2
1
86
6
87
1
9
3
2c
1
152
140
119
116
99
126
116
59
a The numbers represent values for covalent binding after 30 min
incubations of [3H]-compound11 with rat liver microsomes in the
presence of NADPH.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
24
25
30
4
8
1c
5
1
39
40
b Mean standard deviation (n = 3).
5
1
40
20
5
59
61
75
49
6
25 10
42
48
65
26
receptor subtype selectivity. Interestingly, the 6-isopro-
pylpiperazine compound, 30, is a potent and selective
MC4R agonist with very little activation on the
MC5R subtype (10%).
29
24
17
3
9
5
49
42
23
61
3
1c
5
116
36
192
49
46
11 1c
A representative number of the alkylated piperazine
compounds were evaluated for potential bioactivation.10
Indeed, alkyl substitution on C-5 of the piperazine ring
dramatically reduced covalent binding in comparison to
MB243 (Table 3). Likewise, the 6-isopropylpiperazine
analog, 30, also afforded a 10-fold decrease in covalent
binding as compared to MB243. Thus, as predicted,
alkylation at either C-5 or C-6 of the piperazine ring
blocks oxidation and further bioactivation.
81
105
a Values represent mean standard error except where indicated. All
data represent at least three determinations except for where
indicated.
b Displacement of [125I]-NDP-a-MSH from human receptors expressed
in CHO cells.
c Values (n = 2) represent mean standard deviation.
functional assay (Table 2).9 The trans-piperazine com-
pounds (8–13, 24, 30) are the best compounds in terms
of overall binding affinity, functional potency, and
receptor subtype selectivity. In addition, N-methylation
on the piperazine ring, does not affect potency or selec-
tivity (24 vs 9). The spirocyclopropylpiperazine com-
pound, 19, shows a 5-fold loss in functional potency in
comparison to the trans-methyl analog, 8, with reduced
In summary, we report the synthesis and evaluation of
MC4R agonists containing a 5- or 6-alkylated piper-
azine side chain. Structure–activity studies show the
trans-5-alkylpiperazine diastereomers are potent and
selective MC4R agonists, while the corresponding cis-
isomers exhibit moderate potency and receptor subtype
selectivity. More importantly, the 5- and 6-alkylated
piperazine side-chain analogs show significantly reduced
covalent binding in comparison to MB243.
Table 2. Functional activity of compounds at human melanocortin
receptors
a
Compds
EC50 (nM) [% max]b
References and notes
MC4Rc
MC3Rd
MC5Rc
1. For recent reviews on melanocortin system, see: (a)
Holder, J. R.; Haskell-Luevano, C. Med. Res. Rev. 2004,
24, 325; (b) Voisey, J.; Carroll, L.; van Daal, A. Curr.
Drug Targ. 2003, 4, 586; (c) Sebhat, I.; Ye, Z.; Bednarek,
M.; Weinberg, D.; Nargund, R.; Fong, T. M. Ann. Rep.
Med. Chem. 2003, 38, 31; (d) Gantz, I.; Fong, T. M. Am. J.
Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 284, E468; (e) Zimanyi,
I. A.; Pelleymounter, M. A. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2003, 9,
1381; (f) Yang, Y. K.; Harmon, C. M. Obesity Rev. 2003,
4, 239.
2. For recent patent reviews, see: (a) Bednarek, M. A.; Fong,
T. M. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2004, 14, 1; (b) Speak, J.
D.; Bishop, M. J. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2002, 12,
1631; (c) Wikberg, J. E. S. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents
2001, 11, 61; (d) Anderson, P. M.; Boman, A.; Seifert, E.;
Skottner, A.; Torbjorn, L. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents
2001, 11, 1583.
3. Palucki, B. L.; Park, M. K.; Nargund, R. P.; Ye, Z.;
Sebhat, I. K.; Pollard, P. G.; Kalyani, R. N.; Tang, R.;
MacNeil, T.; Weinberg, D. H.; Vongs, A.; Rosenblum, C.
I.; Doss, G. A.; Miller, R. R.; Stearns, R. A.; Tamvako-
poulos, C.; Cashen, D. E.; Martin, W. J.; McGowan, E.;
Strack, A. M.; MacIntyre, D. E.; Van der Ploeg, L. H. T.;
Patchett, A. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 171.
a-MSH
8
1.9 0.1 [100]
1.1 0.1 [102]c
[6 3]
[9 4]
17 1 [113]
880 100 [42]
710 270 [43]
340 29 [49]
760 200 [44]
360 58 [46]
300 48 [62]
[45 4]d
8
5
3
5
7
7
2 [79]
1 [89]
1 [82]
1 [102]
2 [99]
2 [95]
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
24
25
30
[8 2]
[9 4]
[11 3]
[10 3]
[6 2]
150 73 [69]
42 10 [77]
36 10 [67]
91 25 [77]
93 23 [69]
41 16 [53]
[6 2]
[4 3]
1400 210 [41]
1400 280 [33]
1000 170 [54]
920 210 [56]
1900 220 [36]
450 51 [56]
2400 1000 [36]
[10 1]d
[5 3]
[5 4]
[6 4]
2
1 [85]
150 21 [29]c
[8 2]
[4 1]
330 170 [58]
18 2 [92]
a Concentration of compound at 50% maximum cAMP accumulation.
b Percentage of cAMP accumulation at 10 lM compound relative to
a-MSH.
c Values represent mean standard error except where indicated. All
data represent at least three determinations.
d Values represent mean standard deviation except where indicated.
All data represent at least three determinations.