M. R. Dintzner et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 1577–1579
1579
94% based on the recovered starting material) and ana-
lyzed by IR and NMR spectroscopy and GC–MS.17
O
R'
O
R'
K10
R'
H
O
O
R'
Acknowledgments
5, R' is aliphatic
6
We thank DePaul University’s College of Liberal Arts
and Science funding, and the National Science Founda-
tion CCLI A&I program (Grant No. DUE-0310624) for
the support in purchasing our Bruker Avance 300 MHz
NMR spectrometer.
Scheme 2. Clay-catalyzed trimerization of aliphatic aldehydes.
with clay that was activated at 200 °C for 1 h and used
in twofold mass excess relative to the aldehyde.
References and notes
Attempts to carry out similar reactions with less substi-
tuted dienes, such as isoprene, were only minimally suc-
cessful, giving some of the desired Diels–Alder adducts
but larger amounts of products of higher molecular
weights. The use of aliphatic aldehydes, such as propi-
onaldehyde and butyraldehyde (5, Scheme 2), as the
dienophile component resulted not in the formation of
the Diels–Alder adducts, but gave predominantly the
corresponding trioxane products (6). We are currently
investigating the clay-catalyzed trimerization of ali-
phatic aldehydes, which will be reported in a separate
Letter.
1. Review: Bednarski, M. D.; Lyssikatos, J. P. In Compre-
hensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.;
Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1991; Vol. 2, pp 661–706.
2. Review: Boger, D. L.; Weinreb, S. M. Hetero Diels–Alder
Methodology in Organic Synthesis; Academic Press: New
York, 1987.
3. Review: Danishefsky, S. J.; Deninno, M. P. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 15–23.
4. Oi, S.; Kashiwagi, K.; Terada, E.; Ohuchi, K.; Inoue, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6351–6354.
5. Dintzner, M. R.; McClelland, K. M.; Morse, K. M.;
Akroush, M. H. Synlett 2004, 11, 2028–2030.
6. Dintzner, M. R.; Lyons, T. W.; Akroush, M. H.; Wucka,
P.; Rzepka, A. T. Synlett 2005, 5, 785–788.
7. Yahiaoui, A.; Belbachir, M.; Hachemaoui, A. Int. J. Mol.
Sci. 2003, 4, 548–561.
8. Zhao, H.; Malhotra, S. V. Aldrichim. Acta 2002, 35, 75–83.
9. Li, M.; Xu, Z.; Ma, C.; Zhang, W. Zhejiang Gongye Daxue
Xuebao 2002, 30, 500–504.
10. Tundo, P.; Perosa, A. Chem. Rev. 2002, 2, 13–23.
11. Onaka, M. Gendai Kagaku 2002, 371, 14–20.
12. Onaka, M. Petrotech 2001, 24, 837–841.
13. Cave, G. W. V.; Raston, C. L.; Scott, J. L. Chem.
Commun. 2001, 21, 2159–2169.
As ‘green chemistry’ becomes more prevalent in organic
synthesis,8–14 environmentally benign clays are becom-
ing attractive alternatives to more toxic Lewis acid cat-
alysts for an array of reactions,15,16 and optimization
of conditions for their use is necessary. The work re-
ported here has proven important in our ongoing efforts
to demonstrate the utility of Montmorillonite clays in
organic synthesis, and may prove useful for others as
well. We are currently investigating the additional appli-
cations of clays as catalysts for organic reactions.
14. Reed, S. M.; Hutchinson, J. E. J. Chem. Ed. 2000, 77,
1627–1629.
A representative experimental procedure for the clay-
catalyzed hetero-Diels–Alder follows for 3b: Montmo-
rillonite K10 clay (50 mg) was measured into a vial
and heated in an oven at approximately 200 °C for
1 h. The activated clay was transferred to a desiccator
and allowed to cool to room temperature. To the clay
was added 0.1 mL CCl4, followed by 0.11 mmol o-anis-
aldehyde. The mixture was allowed to sit for about
5 min. Then, 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene (0.10 mmol)
was added via pipette. The reaction mixture was allowed
to sit at room temperature for 1 h, then filtered to re-
move the clay. Solvent was removed under vacuum
and the product isolated as a pale yellow oil (15 mg,
15. Nagendrappa, G. Resonance 2002, 64–77.
16. Corey, E. J.; Wu, L. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9327–
9328.
17. 3,6-Dihydro-4,5-dimethyl-2-(2-methoxyphenyl)-2H-pyran
(3b). IR: 2918, 2835, 1589, 1493, 1462, 1371, 1287, 1242,
1
1100, 1050, 1032, 753 cmꢀ1; H NMR (CDCl3) d 7.63 (d,
J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (t,
J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 5.04 (dd, J =
3.8, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (m, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 2.30 (m, 2H),
1.79 (s, 3H), 1.70 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) d 155.8,
136.5, 128.1, 126.1, 124.3, 120.9, 110.1, 70.9, 70.5, 55.2,
37.6, 18.4, 13.9 ppm; GC–MS (70 eV), tR = 11.612 min,
m/z 218 M+ (44%); 135, [Mꢀ83]+ (100%); 82, [Mꢀ136]+
(79%); 67, [Mꢀ151]+ (87%).