947
Asymmetric synthesis of novel isoindolines
stirred at room temperature for 24 h. Volatile matter
was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue
taken up in MeOH–NH3. After 24 h at room temper-
ature, the volatile matter was evaporated under reduced
pressure and the residue was purified by column chro-
matography (CHCl3–MeOH, 70:30) to give 8 as an oil
(54%); δH (CDCl3) 1.44, 2.23, 3.98, 4.25 (6 H, m,
dioxanyl), 3.65 (1 H, dd, J l 4.9, 10.7, CH2O), 3.73
(1 H, dd, J l 8.2, 10.7, CH2O), 4.53 (1 H, dd, J l 4.9,
8.1, CHNH2), 5.68 (1 H, s, dioxanyl), 7.57–7.31 (4 H,
m, aromatic H); δC (CDCl3) 26.0, 67.9, 68.0, 101.0
(dioxanyl), 52.5 (CHNH2), 67.6 (C-2h), 126.4, 127.2,
127.7, 129.8, 136.3, 141.4 (aromatic C).
(1S)-1-Acetylamino-2-acetoxy-1-[2-(1,3-dioxan-2-
yl)phenyl]ethane (9)
A mixture of 8 (504 mg, 2.26 mmol) and anhydride
acetic acid (1.27 mL) in pyridine (10 mL) was stirred at
room temperature for 12 h. Volatile matter was evapo-
rated under reduced pressure and the residue was puri-
fied by silica gel column chromatography (CHCl3–
MeOH, 90:10) to give 9 as an oil (91%); δH (CDCl3):
1.38, 2.17, 4.0, 4.18 (6 H, m, dioxanyl), 1.88, 1.99 (6H, s,
COCH3), 4.28 (2 H, m, CH2O), 5.61 (1 H, m, CHNHAc),
5.80 (1 H, s, dioxanyl), 7.26–7.61 (4 H, m, aromatic H);
δC (CDCl3) 21.3, 23.5 (CH3), 26.0, 67.7, 99.6 (dioxanyl),
48.8 (CHNHAc), 66.3 (C-2), 126.8, 127.0, 128.3, 129.4,
136.8, 136.9 (aromatic C), 170.2, 171.7 (CO).
Figure 2 Synthesis of (3S)-3-acetoxymethyl-2-acetyl-1,3-dihydro-
1-methoxyisoindole (10). Reagents and conditions: i, Ewing et al
(2000); ii, MsCl, pyridine; iii, LiN3, DMF; iv, PPh3, NH3, THF; v,
NH3, MeOH; vi, Ac2O, pyridine; vii, HCl 1%, MeOH.
(C-2), 90.4 (CHOMe), 123.4, 129.1, 129.7, 130.3, 135.7,
139.0 (aromatic C), 170.9, 172.6 (CO).
Results and Discussion
The protected dihydroxyaldehyde 2 was easily prepared
(Figure 2) from phthalaldehyde (1) (Ewing 1999, 2000)
in four steps including asymmetric dihydroxylation with
(3S)-3-Acetoxymethyl-2-acetyl-1,3-dihydro-1-
methoxyisoindole (10)
Compound 9 was dissolved in methanolic HCl (1%, Admix β. The dihydroxylation step is completely stereo-
10 mL) and the mixture stirred for 2 h at room tem- selective, which is important in generating the R con-
perature. Water was added and the mixture extracted figuration at the chiral centre (which will become part of
with diethyl ether. The extract was worked up and the the new ring). The essential strategy to get an appro-
crude product purified by column chromatography priate nitrogen functionality in place requires the in-
(CHCl3–MeOH, 99:1) to give 10 (34%) (cis and trans sertion, with inversion, of an azido group at the chiral
1:1) as an oil; cis isomer, δH (CDCl3) 1.92, 2.25 (6H, two site, and this was achieved by O-mesylation followed by
s, COMe), 3.1 (3H, s, OMe), 4.39 (1 H, dd, J l 6.1, 11.0, treatment with lithium azide in dimethylformamide to
CH2O), 4.67 (1 H, dd, J l 4.0, 11.0, CH2O), 5.28 (1 H, give intermediate 4 in 76% yield. Reduction of the azido
dd, J l 4.1, 6.0, CHNHAc), 6.29 (1 H, s, CHOCH3), group in 4 was best accomplished with the Staudinger
7.35 (4 H, m, aromatic H); δC(CDCl3) 21.2, 22.7 procedure using PPh3–NH3 in methanol. Under these
(COMe), 50.5 (OMe), 60.6 (CHNHAc), 65.1 (C-2), 91.2 conditions, an O-to-N migration of the benzoyl group
(CHOMe), 123.8, 124.5, 129.0, 130.4, 135.8, 139.2 (aro- occurred to some extent and a mixture of the ester 5 and
matic C), 170.9, 172.6 (CO); trans isomer, δH (CDCl3) the amide 6 was obtained. This mixture was not amen-
1.79, 2.27 (6H, s, COMe), 2.77 (3H, s, OMe), 4.53 (1 H, able to separation by column chromatography. How-
dd, J l 6.1, 11.0, CH2O), 4.67 (1 H, dd, J l 4.0, 11.0, ever, this problem could be avoided by removing the
CH2O), 5.4 (1 H, dd, J l 4.1, 6.0, CHNHAc), 6.41 (1 H, protecting benzoyl group before reduction. Thus, the
s, CHOMe), 7.35 (4 H, m, aromatic H); δC (CDCl3) 21.0, azido alcohol 7 was reduced (54% yield), and the
23.0 (2C, COMe), 48.6 (OCH3), 62.2 (CHNHAc), 63.7 primary hydroxy group reprotected, by acetylation.