iron could be a more successful catalyst than palladium for
this important transformation as iron is known for its rich
redox chemistry.11
Scheme 1. Ligand Evaluation Using FeCl3 as the Iron Source
We initiated our study reacting benzaldehyde with phe-
nylboronic acid in the presence of NHC precursor 4 and
FeCl3 in dioxane at 90 °C and under a N2 atmosphere. Very
disappointingly, we only detected the formation of ester 3
in traces amounts. Screening different ligands, the yield of
3 was improved to 15% when using imidazolium 5. Bulkier
NHCs generated from 7-9 afforded no product (Scheme 1).
Table 1. Iron Source Evaluation Using NHC Precursor 5
as catalysts for the direct oxidative aromatic esterification
of aldehydes.
entry
ligand
iron source
FeCl3
FeCl3·6H2O
FeCl2·4H2O
Fe(OTf)2
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O
TPPFeCl
Fe(acac)2
Fe(OTf)2
No iron
Fe(OTf)2
Fe(OTf)2
Fe(OTf)2
yielda (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
41
39
62
95
The ester functionality is present ubiquitously in the
structure of important natural and synthetic molecules and
for this reason constitutes an important synthetic target. The
existent strategies to prepare carboxylic esters under mild
conditions usually involve the activation of the carboxylic
acid as an acyl halide, anhydride, or activated ester followed
by nucleophilic substitution. The direct oxidative esterifica-
tion of aldehydes remains as an attractive possibility to
readily access esters.6 Recently, Darcel et al. reported the
one-pot oxidative esterification of aldehydes using
Fe(ClO4)3·xH2O and H2O2 in the presence of different
alcohols.7 Less attention though has been paid to the
synthesis of aryl benzoate derivatives despite their importance
as building blocks of numerous active compounds and as
cross coupling partners.8 Usually, these compounds are
prepared via esterification or transesterification reactions
which normally involve strong acidic or basic conditions
limiting the reaction scope.9 The Baeyer-Villiger oxidation
reaction is another classical method to prepare benzoate deri-
vatives though low regioselectivities are obtained when asym-
metric benzophenoes derivatives are used.10 Fully aware of these
limitations Wu, Cheng et al. reported the NHC-palladium-
catalyzed aromatic esterification of aldehydes with boronic
acids in toluene at 120 °C under air.8 Despite the vast
potential of this reaction, only modest yields were obtained,
typically between 5 and 68%. Therefore, we envisioned that
22
no product
no product
no product
no product
80
no ligand
9
5
5
5
5
5
10b
11c
12d
13e
48
76
CuSO4·5H2O
no product
a Isolated yield after preparative thin-layer chromatography (hexanes/
AcOEt). Reaction conditions: benzaldehyde (0.247 mmol), phenylboronic
acid (0.247 mmol), iron (20.0 mol %), 5 (20.0 mol %), KOtBu (0.247 mmol),
dioxane 1.5 mL, 90 °C for 24 h. b The same reaction conditions as in
footnote a with the following exception: 80 °C for 24 h. c The same reaction
conditions as in footnote a with the following exception: iron (10.0 mol
%) and 5 (10.0 mol %). d The same reaction conditions as in footnote a
with the following exception: iron (15.0 mol %) and 5 (15.0 mol %). e The
same reaction conditions as in footnote a with the following exception:
CuSO4·5H2O (20.0 mol %).
Having identified the most efficient ligand, we performed
exactly the same reaction under air. The presence of air was
crucial for this reaction as the yield was improved up to 41%
(Table 1, entry 1). Performing the reaction using Schlenk
line techniques, no product was obtained. Therefore, the
screening of different iron sources was carried out in the
presence of air (Table 1, entries 2-7). Very gratifyingly,
Fe(OTf)2 afforded the desired ester in 95% isolated yield
using equimolar amounts of benzaldehyde and phenylboronic
acid. The importance of both the ligand and the iron source
was undoubtedly demonstrated as without one of them the
(6) Kovi, K. E.; Wolf, C. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 6302.
(7) Wu, X.-F.; Darcel, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 1144.
(8) Qin, C.; Wu, H.; Chen, J.; Liu, M.; Cheng, J.; Su, W.; Ding, J. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 1537.
(9) (a) Sarvari, M. H.; Sharghi, H. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 10903. (b)
Tamaddon, F.; Amrollahi, M. A.; Sharafat, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46,
7841. (c) Shah, S. T. A.; Khan, K. M.; Hussain, H.; Anwar, M. U.; Fecker,
M.; Voelter, W. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6652. (d) Oohashi, Y.; Fukumoto,
K.; Mukaiyama, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 78, 1508.
(10) (a) Olah, G. A.; Wang, Q.; Trivedi, N. J.; Prakash, G. K. S. Synthesis
1991, 739. (b) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Basak, A. K.; Narsaiah, A. V.
Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 248. (c) Kotsuki, H.; Arimura, K.; Araki, T.;
Shinohara, T. Synlett 1999, 462. (d) Toda, F.; Yagi, M.; Kiyoshige, K.
J.Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1988, 958.
(11) Selected examples: (a) Li, Y. Z.; Li, B.-J.; Lu, X.-Y.; Lin, S.; Shi,
Z.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3817. (b) Li, Z.; Yu, R.; Li, H.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7497. (c) Shi, F.; Tse, M. K.; Li, Z.;
Beller, M. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 8793. (d) Nakanishi, M.; Bolm, C.
AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 861. (e) Meyer, N. J.; Lough, A. J.; Morris,
R. H. Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 5605.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 12, 2010
2687