C.J. Kempthorne et al.
Phytochemistry 187 (2021) 112747
to all mass features was performed in Progenesis QI (Non-Linear Dy-
namics). Suitability of data for downstream analysis was assessed by
ensuring tight clustering of quality control pooled samples in principal
component analysis considering all samples. Mass features were
manually processed in MassLynx 4.1 (Waters) to filter out background
and identify molecular ions of interest.
were dried over sodium sulphate and concentrated using rotary evapo-
ration. The crude residue was purified by filtering over a short silica
column (elution with 100% ethyl acetate), followed by solvent removal.
Yield = 156 mg of off-white solid (75% yield). m. p. = 110–111 ◦C
(recrystallized from EtOAc, lit. 114–115 ◦C).1 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 9.06 (s, 1H), 7.89–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.43 (t, J
= 7.6 Hz, 2H), 5.38 (t, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (dd, J = 10.3, 7.9 Hz, 1H),
3.72 (dd, J = 10.2, 8.6 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.6,
173.4, 132.5, 132.0, 128.8, 128.8, 77.8, 35.1. For (R)-2-Phenyl-4,5-
dihydrothiazole-4-carboxylic acid (derived from L-cysteine) 1, [alpha]
D25 = +37.1 (c 0.36, MeOH). For (S)-2-phenyl-4,5-dihydrothiazole-4-
carboxylic acid 2 (derived from D-cysteine), [alpha]D21 = ꢀ 34.9 (c
0.37, MeOH). ESI HRMS expected for C10H10NO2S (M + H)+: 208.0427
found 208.0404.
4.3.4. Untargeted data analysis and compound identification
Putative metabolite identification was completed by: establishing
fragmentation patterns (fragmentation in mass spectra for low and high
energy (first and second function), published spectral data, adducts,
neutral loss); estimating elemental composition (Range C0-100, H0-100,
N0-5, O0-30, S0-3, unsaturation, 5 ppm ≥ m/z 300, 2 mDa ≤200); pu-
tative identification from publicly available and in-house customized
natural products databases and commercially available standards where
applicable. Mass error was calculated using the formula: (observed m/z –
theoretical m/z)/(theoretical m/z * 106). Theoretical m/z were calcu-
lated in Mass Lynx 3.1. Elemental composition was calculated using
ChemCalc Molecular formula based on monoisotopic mass (http
mock- and Pst-inoculated IWFs, using median fold change threshold
(>2) and t-test threshold (P < 0.05, two-tailed, equal variance) volcano
plots. The resulting features of interest were compared across all data-
sets (Col-0, cyp71a12/cyp71a13, and cyp71b15 mock- and Pst-inocu-
lated) using normalized abundance plots and ANOVA testing (P < 0.05,
Tukey’s HSD). Two synthesized standards of dihydrocamalexic acid
(2–5000 pg on column) and a commercially available standard of
camalexin (1–5000 pg on column) were quantified in positive-ion mode;
a commercially available standard of salicylic acid (100–5000 ng on
column) was quantified in negative-ion mode. An internal standard of
deuterated salicylic acid (-d6) was added to each sample for normali-
zation and relative quantification.
2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydrothiazole-4-carboxylic acid (mono-
hydrate) 3 and 4.
4-cyanophenol (119 mg, 1.00 mmol, 1.0 eq.), cysteine (242 mg, 2.00
mmol, 2.0 eq.), and sodium bicarbonate (336 mg, 4.00 mmol, 4.0 eq.)
were added to 4 mL of degassed absolute ethanol in a pressure vial. The
vial was sealed under nitrogen and heated with stirring in a 100 ◦C oil
bath for 24 h. The reaction was removed from the oil bath and cooled to
room temperature and the ethanol was removed using rotary evapora-
tion. The residue was washed with 2 mL of ethyl acetate, suspended in 2
mL of water, cooled to 0 ◦C and carefully quenched by dropwise addition
of 2 M HCl until the mixture was pH 2 (indicator paper). The resulting
mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 4 mL) and the combined
organic extracts were dried over sodium sulphate before concentration
using rotary evaporation. The resulting solid was washed with 0.5 mL of
water to remove trace salts and dried leaving the desired product. Yield
= 178 mg (80% yield) of a white powder. m. p. = 151–153 (decompo-
sition; powder recovered from MeOH; lit. 151–153 ◦C).1 1H NMR (500
MHz, DMSO) δ 12.92 (s, 1H), 10.15 (s, 1H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H),
6.84 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 5.21 (dd, J = 9.3, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (dd, J =
11.1, 9.3 Hz, 1H), 3.55 (dd, J = 11.1, 8.1 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (126 MHz,
DMSO) δ 172.1, 167.7, 160.7, 130.1, 123.4, 115.5, 78.1, 34.8. For (R)-2-
(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydrothiazole-4-carboxylic acid 3 (derived
from L-cysteine), [alpha]D25 = ꢀ 12.4 (c 0.1, MeOH). For (S)-2-(4-
hydroxyphenyl)-4,5-dihydrothiazole-4-carboxylic acid 4 (derived from
D-cysteine), [alpha]D25 = +12.3 (c 0.1, MeOH). ESI HRMS expected for
4.4. Synthesis of dihydrocamalexic acid and structural analogs
All reactions were performed in sealed glass vials or round-bottom
flasks under nitrogen atmosphere. 1H and 13C spectra were recorded
on Bruker AV 500, 600 or 700 MHz spectrometers in CDCl3, DMSO‑d6, or
MeOD. Bulk solvent removal was performed by rotary evaporation
under reduced pressure. For reactions with solvent volumes under 3 mL,
the solvent was evaporated under a stream of nitrogen. Column chro-
matographic purification was performed using Silicycle silica gel
(40–63 μM, 230–400 mesh) with technical grade solvents. Yields are
reported for spectroscopically pure compounds, unless stated otherwise.
Coupling constants are recorded in Hz and chemical shifts are reported
in ppm downfield of TMS. HRMS (ESI+) was performed on a Waters
Micromass Q-ToF Ultima Global. The synthesis of DHCA and derivatives
is based on Maltsev et al. (2013).
C
10H8NO3S (M-H)-: 222.0230 found 222.0236.
(R)-2-(3-Indolyl)-4,5-dihydrothiazole-4-carboxylic acid (DHCA):
3-cyanoindole (36 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1.0 eq.), L-cysteine (60 mg, 0.50
mmol, 2.0 eq.) and sodium bicarbonate (84 mg, 1.00 mmol, 4.0 eq.)
were added to 1 mL of degassed ethanol in a microwave vial. The vial
was sealed under nitrogen and heated with stirring in a 100 ◦C oil bath
for 36 h. The reaction was removed from the oil bath and cooled to room
temperature and the ethanol was removed using rotary evaporation. The
residue was washed with 1 mL of ethyl acetate, suspended in 0.5 mL of
water, cooled to 0 ◦C and carefully quenched by dropwise addition of 2
M HCl until the mixture was pH 2 (indicator paper), resulting in the
precipitation of a small amount of tan solid. The solution was stored in a
refrigerator overnight and the solid was filtered and washed with 2 mL
of water, leaving the desired product. Yield = 26 mg of a tan powder
(42% yield). m. p. = 145–148 ◦C (decomposition; powder precipitated
2-Phenyl-4,5-dihydrothiazole-4-carboxylic acid 1 and 2.
Benzonitrile (103 mg, 1.00 mmol, 1.0 eq.), cysteine (181 mg, 1.50
mmol, 1.5 eq.) and sodium bicarbonate (126 mg, 1.50 mmol, 1.5 eq.)
were added to a degassed solution of methanol (2.6 mL) and water (1.7
mL) in round-bottom flask under nitrogen atmosphere. Then, 50 μL of a
1 M solution of NaOH was added to the reaction mixture and the flask
was sealed under nitrogen and allowed to stir overnight. MeOH was
removed by rotary evaporation and the reaction mixture was washed
◦
with 2 mL of diethyl ether before being cooled to 0 C and carefully
quenched by dropwise addition of 2 M HCl until the mixture was pH 2
(indicator paper) resulting in the solution becoming cloudy. The mixture
was then extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 4 mL), the organic extracts
10