7592
Y. Monguchi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 7589–7592
18, and 40 effectively removes the tethered, unbound
ligands from the ligand pool. Work to confirm this
hypothesis is currently underway.
100
75
50
25
0
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants R33 CA 95944 and
RO1 CA 97360 from the National Cancer Institute.
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
Supplementary data
Log [Ligand], M
Details of the syntheses of compounds 2–4, 6, 8–13, 15,
Figure 1. Representative ligand binding curves generated through
competitive ligand binding analysis comparing the binding affinities of
ligands 18 (h) and 21 (j). The calculated IC50 for 18 is 8 nM with an
R2 value = 0.91 and for 21 10 nM with an R2 value = 0.93.
1
and 16 and H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of com-
pounds 2–4, 8, 9, 11–13, 15, and 16. Supplementary data
associated with this article can be found, in the online
SkanWasher. Enhancement solution (Perkin Elmer,
1244-105) was added (100 lL/well) and the plates were
incubated for 30 min at 37 °C prior to reading. The
plates were read on a Wallac VICTOR3 instrument
using the standard Eu TRF measurement (340 nm exci-
tation, 400 ls delay, and emission collection for 400 ls
at 615 nm). Competition curves (e.g., Fig. 1) were ana-
lyzed with GraphPad Prism Software using the sigmoi-
dal dose–response classical equation for non-linear
regression analysis. Each data point represents the aver-
age of four samples, with the error bars indicating stan-
dard error of the mean.
References and notes
1. Handl, H. L.; Vagner, J.; Han, H.; Mash, E.; Hruby, V. J.;
Gillies, R. J. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2004, 8, 565–
586.
2. (a) Mammen, M.; Choi, S.-K.; Whitesides, G. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2754–2794; (b) Kiessling, L. L.;
Gestwicki, J. E. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 696–
703.
3. (a) Vagner, J.; Handl, H. L.; Gillies, R. J.; Hruby, V. J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 211–215; (b) Raju, N.;
Ranganathan, R. S.; Tweedle, M. F.; Swenson, R. E.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1463–1465.
Table 1 lists the IC50 values (averaged over n experi-
ments) for the ligand NDP-a-MSH, as well as for pep-
tides 17–22, 40, and 41. Interestingly, the IC50 values
for 17, 18, and 40 were virtually the same as for NDP-
a-MSH and the controls 20, 21, and 41. These results
indicate that the phenyl, biphenyl, and phenylnaphthyl
linkers have little or no effect on ligand binding to
hMC4R. Interestingly, compounds 19 and 22 that incor-
porate the terphenyl linker showed modest increases in
IC50. In addition, the expected statistical halving of
the IC50 for compounds containing two NDP-a-MSH
ligands was observed only for 19 and 22. This is consis-
tent with the observation that these compounds bind
less well to hMC4R. Tight binding in the cases of 17,
4. Maison, W.; Frangioni, J. V.; Pannier, N. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 4567–4569.
5. On balance the series of linkers should be hydrophilic, but
short hydrophobic segments may be tolerated, if not
beneficial.
6. Purchased from Torviq, Niles MI.
7. Manku, S.; Wang, F.; Hall, D. G. J. Comb. Chem. 2003, 5,
379–391.
8. Purchased from CombiBlocks, San Diego, CA.
9. Purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company.
˚
10. Distances between the benzylic carbon atoms: 1, 5.8 A; 2,
˚
˚
˚
10.0 A; 3, 14.3 A; and 4, 12.2 A; determined using AM1 in
Spartan Õ02 v1.0.4e.
11. van Heerden, P. S.; Bezuidenhoudt, B. C. B.; Ferreira, D.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 1141–1146.
12. Purchased from Acros Organics.
13. (a) Sawyer, T. K.; Sanfilippo, P. J.; Hruby, V. J.; Engel,
M. H.; Heward, C. B.; Burnett, J. B.; Hadley, M. E. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1980, 77, 5754–5755; (b) Hadley,
M. E.; Anderson, B.; Heward, C. B.; Sawyer, T. K.;
Hruby, V. J. Science 1981, 213, 1025–1027.
14. (a) Merrifield, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2149–
2154; (b) Hruby, V. J.; Meyer, J.-P. In Bioorganic
Chemistry: Peptides and Proteins; Hecht, S. M., Ed.;
Oxford Univ. Press: New York, 1988; pp 27–64.
15. Details will appear in a full paper to follow.
16. Handl, H. L.; Vagner, J.; Yamamura, H. I.; Hruby, V. J.;
Gillies, R. J. Anal. Biochem. 2004, 330, 242–250.
17. The hMC4R vector was originally received from Dr. Ira
Gantz; see: Gantz, I.; Miwa, H.; Konda, Y.; Shimoto, Y.;
Tashiro, T.; Watson, S. J.; Delvalle, J.; Yamada, T. J.
Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 15174–15179.
Table 1. Competitive binding of NDP-a-MSH and 17–22, 40, and 41
to hMC4R
Compound
IC50 (nM)
na
NDP-a-MSH
5.6
3.5
5.0
5.6
5.2
8.4
16.5
3.7
3.9
3
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
4
17
20
18
21
19
22
40
41
a The IC50 value given is the average of n independent binding experi-
ments, each done in quadruplicate.