Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
[5]
À
À
intramolecular alkenyl C H/aromatic C H cross-coupling,
if ions 2 react as stabilized benzyl cations with aromatic
compounds 3, the resulting 1,1-diaryl-2-iodoethanes 4 could
be easily transformed to 1,1-diarylethylene 5 by treatment
to an increase in the yield to 61%. Diphenyl sulfoxide was
more effective and gave 5aa in 82% yield (See Supporting
Information for the CV data of the electrochemical step). On
the other hand, the use of sulfilimine,[13] which is used for
À
À
À
À
with a base. Thus, alkenyl C H/aromatic C H cross-coupling
can be achieved. The concept works, and herein we report
benzylic C H/aromatic C H coupling, gave 5aa in only 18%
yield, although the reason is not clear at present. Therefore,
hereafter we used diphenyl sulfoxide. The use of lower
amount of 3a decreased the yield of 5aa. When 1, 2, and
5 equivalents of 3a were used, the NMR yield of 5aa were 66,
77, and 87%, respectively (Table S1 in the Supporting
Information). The present transformation can be performed
on a gram scale and 0.84 g of 5aa was obtained (Table 1,
entry 1).
À
À
metal- and oxidant-free alkenyl C H/aromatic C H cross-
coupling using electrogenerated iodosulfonium ions.
We first screened sulfoxides. Iodine was electrochemically
oxidized in the presence of various sulfoxides in dichloro-
methane to generate the corresponding iodosulfonium ions.
After the electrolysis was complete, 4-bromostyrene (1a) was
added to the anodic solution to generate b-iodoalkoxysulfo-
nium ion 2a (Scheme 3).
b-Iodoalkoxysulfonium ion 2a derived from 1a and
diphenyl sulfoxide was successfully characterized by mass
spectroscopy and H and 13C NMR analyses (See the Sup-
1
porting Information for details). There was a characteristic
lower chemical shift of the benzylic proton of 2a compared
with that of 1-(4-bromophenyl)-2-iodoethanol (6a)
1
(Figure 1). Variable-temperature H NMR analysis revealed
that 2a is stable at temperatures lower than À208C (Fig-
ure S3). Notably, 1,1-diaryl-2-iodoethane 4aa was isolated in
85% yield when DBU was not added.
Scheme 3. Screening of sulfoxides. Iodine (0.25 mmol) was electro-
chemically oxidized in the presence of 2.0 mmol of sulfoxide or
sulfilimine in a 0.3m solution of Bu4NBF4 in CH2Cl2 at À788C. After
3.0F of electricity was applied, 1a (0.4 mmol) was added. The resulting
solution was treated with 2a (2.0 mmol) and DBU (1,8-diazabicyclo-
[5.4.0]undec-7-ene) (2.0 mmol). Isolated yields based on the amount
of 1a used are shown.
Figure 1. 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of 2a and 6a.[18]
The reaction of 2a with 1,2-dimethoxybenzene (3a) gave
4aa presumably via a benzylic cation stabilized by intra-
molecular participation of iodine, indicating that the solution
of 2a serves as a stabilized cation pool for aromatic
compounds. The subsequent reaction with DBU[15] gave 1,1-
diarylethylene 5aa (Scheme 4a). When DMSO was used as
a sulfoxide, 5aa was obtained in 35% yield. In this case, the
corresponding epoxide 7a was also obtained in 13% yield
probably due to attack on the sulfur atom of 2a to give 6a,
which underwent cyclization by the action of DBU to give 7a
(Scheme 4b).[16,17] To suppress the epoxide formation, we
examined sulfoxides having bulky substituents. When tetra-
methylene sulfoxide was used, the yield of 5aa decreased to
23%. However, the use of methyl phenyl sulfoxide gave rise
The present one-pot transformation is applicable to other
vinylarenes bearing various functional groups as shown in
Table 1. Styrene (1b) and styrenes having methyl, ester, and
bromo groups on the aromatic ring gave the corresponding
1,1-diarylethylenes (entries 1–6). The reactions of substrates
with trisubstituted alkenes was interesting. The reaction of
(Z)-1g with 3a gave (Z)-5ga as a major product and (E)-5ga
as a minor product, while that of (E)-1g with 3a gave (E)-5ga
as a sole product. The present reaction can be applied to cyclic
alkenes. Indene (1h), a 5-membered ring alkene, gave the
corresponding 1,1-diarylethylene 5ha, while 1,2-dihydro-
naphthalene (1i), a 6-membered ring alkene, gave the
alkene 5ia’ instead of the corresponding diarylethylene. The
reaction of 1j with two equivalents of iododiphenylsulfonium
ion and 3a gave the double arylated alkene 5ja. The
regioselectivity of the reaction was very high. Only 1,1-
diarylethylenes were obtained.
Next, we examined the reactions of b-iodoalkoxysulfo-
nium ion 2a with various aromatic nucleophiles (Table 2). 1,2-
Dimethoxybenzene (3a) and 1,4-dimethoxybenzene (3c)
gave 5aa and 5ac, respectively in good yields, while 1,3-
dimethoxybenzene (3b) gave 5ab in a poor yield. Anisole
(3d) gave the 1,1-diarylethylene as a mixture of two isomers,
while 2-iodoanisole (3e) gave 5ae as a single isomer. Xylene
(3 f) and 1-methylnaphthalene (3g) gave the corresponding
Scheme 4. A plausible mechanism.
2
ꢀ 2018 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!