5638 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 102, No. 28, 1998
Kao et al.
Pitchumani, K.; Corbin, D. R.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 8152.
(2) Habgood, H. W, J. Phys. Chem. 1965, 69, 1764.
(3) Uytterhoeven, J. B.; Schoonheydt, R.; Liengme, B. V.; Hall, W.
K. J. Catal. 1969, 13, 425.
(4) Ward, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 4211.
(5) Hunger, M.; Freude D.; Pfeifer, H.; Prager, D. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1989, 63, 221.
similarity. Structure 17 results from the migration of a “methyl”
group while 19 comes from the migration of the phenyl group.
As indicated in Scheme 6, migration of a phenyl group is more
likely due to stabilization of the intermediate via phenonium
ion formation.30 Further work is underway to confirm the
suggestion.31
(6) Kao, H. M.; Grey, C. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 5105.
(7) Kao, H. M.; Grey, C. P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 259, 459.
(8) (a) Miale, J. N.; Chen, N. Y.; Weisz, P. B. J. Catal. 1966, 6, 278.
(b) Venuto P. B.; Hamilton, L. A.; Landis, P. S. J. Catal. 1966, 4, 81.
(9) Costenoble, M. L.; Mortier, W. J.; Uytterhoeven, J. B. J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans. I, 1978, 74, 466.
(10) Costenoble, M. L.; Mortier, W. J.; Uytterhoeven, J. B. J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans. I, 1978, 74, 477.
(11) Yesinowski, J. P.; Eckert, H.; Rossman, G. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988, 110, 1367.
(12) Grey, C. P.; Vega, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8232.
(13) (a) McClelland, R. A.; Kangasabapathy, V. M.; Steenken, S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 6913. (b) Azarani, A.; Berinstain, A. B.;
Johnston, L. J.; Kazanis, S. J. Photochem. A: Chem. 1991, 57, 175.
(14) McClelland, R. A.; Chan, C.; Cozens, F.; Modro, A.; Steenken, S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1337.
(15) (a) Ward, J. W. In Zeolite Chemistry and Catalysis; Rabo, J. A.,
Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1976; p 118. (b)
Poutsma, M. L. In Zeolite Chemistry and Catalysis; Rabo, J. A., Ed.;
American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1976; p 437.
(16) (a) Rothwell, W. P.; Chen, W.; Lunsford, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1984, 106, 2452. (b) Lunsford, J. H.; Rothwell, W. P.; Shen, W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1540.
(17) Rao, V. J.; Perlstein, D. L.; Robbins, R. J.; Lakshminarasimhan,
P. H.; Kao, H.-M.; Grey, C. P.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1998, 269.
(18) (a) Corbin, D. R.; Farlee, R. D.; Stucky, G. D. Inorg. Chem. 1984,
23, 2922. (b) Pluth, J. F.; Smith, J. V. J. Am Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 1192.
(19) Dempsey, E. J. Phys. Chem. 1969, 73, 3666.
Conclusions
Variable-temperature 1H MAS NMR spectra of CaY, calcined
in an oven, show resonances of Brønsted acid sites, Al-OH
species, and Si-OH groups. A “Pake doublet” was also
observed, with an isotropic chemical shift close to that of the
Brønsted acid sites, resulting from proton-proton dipolar
coupling between the two protons in a rigidly bound water
molecule. This resonance is assigned to water bound to a
2+
calcium cation i.e., Ca(OH2)n (n ) 1) in the sodalite cages.
1H/27Al TRAPDOR NMR demonstrated that the water mol-
1
ecules are in close proximity to aluminum atoms. The H
resonances from CaOH+ groups in the sodalite cages resonate
at 2.1-2.8 ppm and are most easily seen in the 1H/27Al
TRAPDOR spectrum when 27Al irradiation was applied. A
concentration of approximately 16 Brønsted acid sites/unit cell
was determined by adsorbing TMP molecules on the sample
activated at 500 °C. Only a small number of Brønsted acid
sites were detected, when samples were carefully calcined in a
1
vacuum. No Lewis acidity was observed. A H resonance at
0.7 ppm observed in the spectrum of CaY calcined at 200 °C is
(20) Massiot, D.; Bessada, C.; Coutures, J. P.; Taulelle, F. J. Magn.
Reson. 1990, 90, 231.
assigned to CaOH+ groups in the supercages.
(21) (a) Robbins, R.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1997, 1071. (b) Li, X.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
10666. (c) Robbins, R.; Crompton, E.; Ramamchandran, S.; Ramamurthy,
V. Unpublished results.
(22) (a) Pitchumani, K.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1996, 2763. (b) Jayathirtha Rao, V.; Prevost, N.; Ramamurthy, V.; Kojima,
M.; Johnston L. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1997, 2209.
(23) For carbocation formation in solution: (a) Gold, V.; Hawes, B.
W. V.; Tye, F. L. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 2167. (b) Gold, V.; Tye, F. L. J.
Chem. Soc. 1952, 2172. (c) Evans, A. G.; Jones, N.; Jones, P. M. S.; Thomas,
J. H. J. Chem. Soc. 1956, 2757. (d) Evans, A. G.; Jones, P. M. S.; Thomas,
J. H. J. Chem. Soc. 1957, 104. (e) Grace, J. A.; Symons, M. C. R. J. Chem.
Soc. 1959, 958.
(24) For carbocation formation on a silica-alumina surface, see the
following: (a) Leftin, H. P.; Hall W. K. J. Phys. Chem. 1960, 64, 382. (b)
Leftin, H. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1960, 64, 1714. (c) Leftin, H. P.; Hall, W. K.
J. Phys. Chem. 1962, 66, 1457. (d) Leftin, H. P.; Hobson, M. C.; Leigh, J.
S. J. Phys. Chem. 1962, 66, 1214. (e) Rooney, J. J.; Pink, R. C. Trans.
Farady Soc. 1962, 1632. (f) Hall, W. K. J. Catal. 1962, 1, 53.
(25) (a) Rooney, J. J.; Hathaway, B. J. J. Catal. 1964, 3, 447. (b) Dollish,
F. R.; Hall, W. K. J. Phys. Chem. 1965, 69, 4402.
The number of Brønsted acid sites present within CaY is
controlled by the mode of activation. This determines the
activity of CaY and, in turn, the nature of the products obtained.
For the reactions studies in this paper, the Brønsted acid sites
reacted stoichiometrically when present in high concentrations,
resulting in the reduction of the olefin. At lower concentrations,
the Brønsted acid sites acted catalytically to affect isomerization
reactions. Finally, this paper shows that a combined zeolite
characterization and product reactivity study of the same
materials, activated under identical conditions, can be very
helpful in rationalizing the product distributions, especially in
reactions where both a wide range of products are possible and
with zeolites whose properties can vary significantly with
activation conditions.
Acknowledgment. The National Science Foundation Na-
tional Young Investigator program (Grant DMR-9458017) is
thanked for their partial support of this research. The solid-
state NMR spectrometer was purchased with a grant from the
National Science Foundation (CHE-9405436). V.R. thanks the
Division of Chemical Sciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences,
Office of Energy Research, U.S. Department of Energy, for
support of this program.
(26) Hirschler, A. J. Catal. 1963, 2, 428.
(27) Fornes, V.; Garcia, H.; Jovanvic, S.; Marti, V. Tetrahedron 1997,
53, 4715.
(28) Reviews: (a) Leftin, H. P.; Hobson, M. C. AdV. Catal. 1963, 14,
115. (b) Terenin, A. AdV. Catal. 1964, 15, 227.
(29) (a) Al-Ekabi, H.; Kawata, H.; de Mayo, P. J. Org. Chem. 1988,
53, 1471. (b) Shida; T.; Hamill, W. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 44, 4372. (c)
Brede, O.; Bos, J.; Helmstreet, W.; Mehnert, R. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1982,
19, 1. (d) Mizuno, K.; Tamai, T.; Hashida, I.; Otsuji, Y.; Kuriyama, Y.;
Tokumaru, K. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 7329. (e) Konuma, S.; Aihara, S.;
Kuriyama, Y.; Misawa, H.; Akaba, R.; Sakuragi, H.; Tokumaru, K. Chem.
Lett. 1991, 1897.
(30) (a) Bartlett, P. D., Ed. Nonclassical Ions; W. A. Benjamin: New
York, 1965. (b) Pocker, Y. In Molecular Rearrangements; de Mayo, P.,
Ed.; Interscience: New York, 1963; Part 1, pp 1-25.
(31) At this stage, both 17 and 19 could account for the long λ
absorption. Mechanism provided in Scheme 6 accounts for the formation
of both 17 and 19 as well as for the isolated products 2, 3, 20, and 24.
References and Notes
(1) (a) Pitchumani, K.; Joy, A.; Prevost, N.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1997, 127. (b) Pitchumani, K.; Lakshminarasimhan,
P. H.; Prevost, N.; Corbin, D. R.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1997, 181. (c) Pitchumani, K.; Lakshminarasimhan, P. H.; Turner,
G.; Bakker, M. G.; Ramamurthy, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 371. (d)