1130 Organometallics, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2004
Canty et al.
3
3
P r ep a r a tion of P d (O2CAr F)Tol(tm ed a ) (18). Yield: 0.022
g (92%). 1H NMR (acetone-d6): δ 8.01 (dd, 2H, 3J ) 8.2 Hz, 4J
isomer], J ) 8.0 Hz, meta-ArF), 7.04 (d (br), 2H, J ) 7.6 Hz,
meta-Tol), 2.29 (s, 3H, Me), 2.02 (s, 3H, PdMe), 1.20 (s, 3H,
PdMe).
3
4
) 0.8 Hz, ortho-ArF), 7.57 (dd, 2H, J ) 8.2 Hz, J ) 0.8 Hz,
meta-ArF), 7.32 (d, 2H, ortho-Tol), 6.64 (d, 2H, 3J ) 7.6 Hz,
meta-Tol), 2.95 (m, 2H, NCH2), 2.74 (m, 2H, NCH2), 2.58 (s,
6H, NCH3), 2.56 (s, 6H, NCH3), 2.12 (s, 3H, Me). IR (Nujol
mull): ν(CO2) 1613 s, 1572 m, ∼1360 s (overlaps with Nujol
peak); ν(CF3) 1321 vs. Anal. Calcd: C, 50.16; H, 5.41; N, 5.57.
Found: C, 50.30; H, 5.33; N, 5.56.
1H NMR Stu d ies of th e Rea ction of P a lla d iu m (II)
Com p lexes w ith (Ar CO2)2 (Ar ) P h , Ar F ). P d MeR(L2) (R
) Me, Tol; L ) bp y, tm ed a ) w ith (Ar CO2)2. In a typical
experiment, a solution of PdMeR(L2) in acetone-d6 (0.3 mL)
in an NMR tube was cooled to eThinSpace-50 °C. To this was
added a solution of (ArCO2)2 in acetone-d6 (0.3 mL) in the ratios
outlined in the Results section. The tube was placed in a NMR
probe, precooled to eThinSpace-50 °C, and the solution was
warmed in 10 °C intervals with monitoring. Products of the
reaction were identified by GC-MS and by comparison of the
In Situ Syn th esis of P a lla d iu m (IV) Com p lexes P d -
(O2CAr )Me2R(L2) (Ar ) P h , Ar F ; R ) Me, Tol; L2 ) tm ed a ,
bp y) (1-4, 13, 14). Gen er a l Syn th esis. Iodomethane (1 mL)
was cooled to -35 °C. To this was added PdMeR(L2) (0.0294
mmol) and the solution stirred for 30 min. The volatile
components were removed in vacuo at low temperature,
leaving a pale yellow solid, [PdIMe2R(L2)]. The solid was
redissolved in acetone-d6 (0.6 mL) at -70 °C. To this was added
silver aroate (0.0297 mmol), and a reaction was observed
immediately. The suspension was stirred for 30 min at -50
°C, then quickly filtered through a plug of glass fiber filter
paper into a precooled NMR tube.
1
observed H NMR to the 1H NMR of known and independently
synthesized compounds.
P d (O2CAr )R(L2) (R ) Me, Tol; L ) bp y, tm ed a ) w ith
(Ar CO2)2. In a typical experiment, a solution of (ArCO2)2 in
acetone-d6 (0.3 mL) was added to a solution of Pd(O2CAr)R-
(L2) in acetone-d6 (0.3 mL) and allowed to go to completion at
ambient temperature (several hours for R ) Me and several
days for R ) Tol). Products of the reaction were identified by
GC-MS and by comparison of the observed 1H NMR to the
1H NMR of known and independently synthesized compounds.
1H NMR Stu d ies of th e Rea ction of Diiod in e w ith
P d MeR(bp y) (R ) Me, Tol). In a typical experiment, a
solution of I2 in acetone-d6 (0.4 mL) in an NMR tube was cooled
to ∼ThinSpace-50 °C. To this was added a solution of PdMeR-
(bpy) in acetone-d6 (0.3 mL) in 1:1 ratio. 1H NMR spectra
showed the presence of PdI2MeR(bpy) (19, 20) (see below). The
solutions were warmed in 10 °C intervals with monitoring.
Iodomethane and PdIMeR(bpy) were formed at ca. ThinSpace-
10 °C (R ) Me) and at -50 °C (R ) Tol).
fa c-P d (O2CP h )Me3(bp y) (1). 1H NMR (acetone-d6, -30
3
3
°C): δ 9.01 (d, 2H, J ) 4.0 Hz, H6), 8.59 (d, 2H, J ) 8.0 Hz,
H3), 8.22 (td, 2H, 3J ) 8.0 Hz, 4J ) 1.6 Hz, H4), 7.79 (ddd,
2H, J ) 5.2 Hz, J ) 1.2 Hz, H5), 7.65 (d, 2H, J ) 6.4 Hz,
ortho-Ph), 7.18 (t, 1H, 3J ) 6.8 Hz, para-Ph), 7.11 (t, 2H, 3J )
7.2 Hz, meta-Ph), 1.72 (s, 6H, PdMe), 0.64 (s, 3H, PdMe).
3
4
3
fa c-P d (O2CAr F )Me3(bp y) (2). 1H NMR (acetone-d6, -30
°C): δ 9.03 (dd, 2H, 3J ) 5.6 Hz, 4J ) 0.8 Hz, H6), 8.40 (d, 2H,
3
4
3J ) 8.0 Hz, H3), 8.26 (td, 2H, J ) 8.0 Hz, J ) 1.6 Hz, H4),
7.84-7.51 (m, 4H, H5 and ortho-ArF), 7.50 (d, 2H, 3J ) 8.0
Hz, meta-ArF), 1.71 (s, 6H, PdMe), 0.69 (s, 3H, PdMe).
1
P d I2Me2(bp y) (19). H NMR (acetone-d6, -40 °C): δ 9.01
fa c-P d (O2CP h )Me3(tm ed a ) (3). 1H NMR (acetone-d6, -40
(d, 2H, 3J ) 5.6 Hz, H6), 8.77 (d, 2H, 3J ) 8.4 Hz, H3), 8.32 (t,
2H, 3J ) 7.6 Hz, H4), 7.86 (t, 2H, 3J ) 6.8 Hz, H5), 2.75 (s,
6H, PdMe).
3
4
°C): δ 7.99 (dd, 2H, J ) 8.0 Hz, J ) 1.6 Hz, ortho-Ph), 7.35
(m, 3H, meta- and para-Ph), 3.0 (br, 2H, NCH2), 2.7 (br, 2H,
NCH2), 2.49 (s, 6H, NCH3), 2.36 (s, 6H, NCH3), 1.53 (s, 6H,
PdMe), 0.78 (s, 3H, PdMe).
P d I2MeTol(bp y) (20). 1H NMR (acetone-d6, -50 °C): δ 9.12
(d, 1H, J ) 4.8 Hz, H6 or H6′), 8.94 (d, 1H, J ) 4.4 Hz, H6
or H6′), 8.85 (m, 2H, H3 and H3′), 8.35 (m, 2H, H4 and H4′),
7.99 (d, 2H, 3J ) 8.4 Hz, ortho-Tol), 7.88 (m, 2H, H5 and H5′),
6.90 (d, 2H, J ) 8.4 Hz, meta-Tol), 3.19 (s, 3H, Me), 2.30 (s,
3H, PdMe).
3
3
fa c-P d (O2CAr F )Me3(tm ed a ) (4). 1H NMR (acetone-d6, -40
3
3
°C): δ 8.18 (d, 2H, J ) 8.4 Hz, ortho-ArF), 7.72 (d, 2H, J )
8.4 Hz, meta-ArF), 3.20-2.82 (br, 2H, NCH2), 2.82-2.60 (br,
2H, NCH2), 2.50 (s, 6H, NCH3), 2.37 (s, 6H, NCH3), 1.53 (s,
6H, PdMe), 0.82 (s, 3H, PdMe).
3
X-r a y Da ta Collection , Str u ctu r e Deter m in a tion , a n d
Refin em en t for 9, 11, a n d 12 a n d th e Solva ted Cr ysta l
Con ta in in g Molecu les of 15. Full spheres of CCD area-
detector diffractometer data were measured (Bruker AXS
instrument, ω-scans; monochromatic Mo KR radiation, λ )
0.71073 Å; T ca. 153 K), yielding Nt(otal) reflections, these
merging to N unique (Rint cited) after “empirical”/multiscan
absorption correction (proprietary software), No with F > 4σ-
(F) being considered “observed” and used in the full matrix
least-squares refinements. Anisotropic displacement param-
eter forms were refined, (x,y,z,Uiso)H, also. Conventional residu-
als R, Rw (weights: ((σ2(F) + 0.0004F2)-1) on |F| are quoted at
convergence. Neutral atom complex scattering factors were
employed within the context of the Xtal 3.7 program system.22
Figure 1 depicts non-hydrogen atoms with 50% probability
amplitude displacement envelopes, hydrogen atoms where
shown having arbitrary radii of 0.1 Å.
P d (O2CP h )Me2Tol(bp y) (13). 13a : 1H NMR δ 9.36 (dd, 2H,
4
3
3J ) 4.8 Hz, J ) 0.8 Hz, H6), 8.42 (d, 2H, J ) 8.4 Hz, H3),
3
4
3
8.15 (td, 2H, J ) 8.0 Hz, J ) 1.6 Hz, H4), 7.84 (ddd, 2H, J
) 5.2 Hz, 4J ) 0.8 Hz, H5), 7.68 (m [overlaps with other
isomer], ortho-Ph), 7.19 (m [overlaps with other isomer], para-
Ph), 7.14 (m [overlaps with other isomer], meta-Ph), 6.87 (d,
2H, 3J ) 8.0 Hz, ortho-Tol), 6.61 (d, 2H, 3J ) 7.6 Hz, meta-
Tol), 2.09 (s, 6H, PdMe), 2.08 (s, 3H, Me). 13b: δ 9.08 (d, 1H,
3J ) 5.6 Hz, H6), 8.60 (m, 2H, H3 and H3′), 8.52 (dd, 1H, 3J )
5.2 Hz, 4J ) 1.2 Hz, H6′), 8.20 (m, 2H, H4 and H4′), 7.79 (ddd,
1H, 3J ) 5.6 Hz, 4J ) 1.2 Hz, H5), 7.68 (m [overlaps with other
isomer], ortho-Ph, H5′), 7.19 (m [overlaps with other isomer],
para-Ph), 7.14 (m [overlaps with other isomer], meta-Ph), 7.03
3
(d (br), 2H, J ) 8.0, meta-Tol), 2.29 (s, 3H, Me), 2.00 (s, 3H,
PdMe), 1.14 (s, 3H, PdMe).
1
P d (O2CAr F )Me2Tol(bp y) (14). H NMR (acetone-d6, -30
3
3
°C): 14a : δ 9.34 (d, 2H, J ) 5.2 Hz, H6), 8.49 (d, 2H, J )
Va r ia ta . Complex 9: (x,y,z,Uiso
)
were constrained at
H
3
4
8.4 Hz, H3), 8.20 (td, 2H, J ) 8.0 Hz, J ) 1.6 Hz, H4), 7.86
(ddd, 2H, 3J ) 5.2 Hz, 4J ) 0.8 Hz, H5) 7.83 (m [overlaps with
other isomer], ortho-ArF), 7.50 (d [overlaps with other isomer],
3J ) 8.0 Hz, meta-ArF), 6.88 (d, 2H, 3J ) 8.0 Hz, ortho-Tol),
estimates in the refinement. Complex 11: Disorder was
modeled in the hydrocarbon bridge of the chelate in terms of
pairs of methylene sites, occupancies 0.770(5), and comple-
ment, not being resolvable beyond. (x,y,z,Uiso
)
were con-
H
3
strained throughout in the refinement at estimates. Complex
15: The dichloromethane solvent molecule was modeled in
terms of two components with common carbon, occupancies
6.63 (d, 2H, J ) 8.0 Hz, meta-Tol), 2.11 (s, 6H, PdMe), 2.08
(s, 3H, Me); 14b: δ 9.08 (dd, 1H, 3J ) 5.2 Hz, 4J ) 0.8 Hz,
3
3
H6), 8.64 (d, 2H, J ) 8.0 Hz, H3 and H3′), 8.52 (dd, 1H, J )
3
5.2 Hz, J ) 0.8 Hz, H6′), 8.24 (m, 2H, H4 and H4′), 7.83 (m
[overlaps with other isomer], ortho-ArF, H5), 7.71 (ddd, 1H,
3J ) 5.6 Hz, 4J ) 1.2 Hz, H5′), 7.50 (d [overlaps with other
(22) Hall, S. R.; du Boulay, D. J .; Olthof-Hazekamp, R., Eds. The
Xtal 3.7 System; University of Western Australia: Perth, 2001.