310
G. Zhao et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 309–312
Scheme 1. (a) LiHMDS, BrCH2CO2Bn, THF, 83%; (b) TFA, CH2Cl2, 99%; (c) biphenyl-4-carboxylic acid, EDC, HOBT, iPr2EtN, CH2Cl2, 85%;
(d) H2, Pd/C, THF, 100%; (e) R-NH2 amines, polystyrene-EDC, iPr2NEt, DMF–ClCH2CH2Cl (1:2), polystyrene-trisamine; (f) 20% TFA in
ClCH2CH2Cl for Boc protectedamines; reverse phase preparative HPLC; 73–94% for two steps.
starting point in an attempt to improve tryptase inhibi-
tory potency. In this letter, we report the solution phase
parallel synthesis of a series of racemic 2-azepanone
analogues of 2 exploring replacements to the aminocy-
clohexylmethyl andbiphenyl substituents leading to the
identification of analogue 8t as a potent andselective
non-mechanism-basedinhibitor of human tryptase.
diamine 7g was synthesizedfrom 7-nitro-tetralone via
oxime mediated hydrogenation followed by Boc protec-
tion of the primary amine.
1-[(3-Aminomethyl-phenyl-carbamoyl)-methyl]-2-oxo-
azepan-3-yl amides 12a–k were synthesizedfrom ester 9,
7
which was preparedusing Skiles’ procedure
(Scheme
3). The hydrolysis of ester 9 with TFA followedby the
reaction with 3-N-Boc aminomethyl aniline (7a) gave
acid 10. Removal of the Cbz group via hydrogenolysis
andcoupling with a variety of acids ACO 2H generated
amides 11 after purification with cation exchange resin.
Subsequently, Boc deprotection provided amides 12a–k.
2. Chemistry
The preparation of biphenyl-4-carboxylic acid(1-car-
bamoylmethyl-2-oxo-azepan-3-yl)-amides 8a–t listedin
Table 1 is outlinedin Scheme 1. Alkylation of 2-azapa-
none 3 with bromoacetic acidbenzyl ester followedby
Boc deprotection gave amine 4. Acylation of 4 with
biphenyl-4-carboxylic acidfollowedby reductive clea-
vage of the benzyl ester gave acid 5. Acid 5 was then
coupled under standard conditions with a variety of
monoamines anddiamines. Where requiredfor selective
coupling, mono-Boc protected diamines were used. Boc-
protected penultimate intermediates were deprotected
using TFA in methylene chloride to afford the final
products 8a–e, 8h–o and 8r–t. Coupling with unpro-
3. Results and discussion
To broadly screen for replacements of the amino-cyclo-
hexylmethyl moiety in 2 over a hundred corresponding
amide analogues of 2 were initially synthesizedusing
commercially available amines. Although neutral R
(Scheme 1) groups were included, an emphasis was
placedon R groups incorporating basic amines since
our working hypothesis was that the aminocyclohexyl
substituent of leadinhibitor 2 may be occupying the S1
pocket of tryptase with the primary amine forming a
salt bridge to Asp 189.1 A subset of these analogues is
shown in Table 1 (compounds 8a–l). Alkylamine analo-
gues of various chain lengths (8a–c) as well as the ami-
nomethylcyclohexyl (8d) or piperidinylmethyl (8e)
analogues were poorly potent for tryptase, as were the
aniline derivitives 8f and 8g. More interesting results
tectedaminoalkyl anilines affordedproducts
8f and 8g
directly, while coupling with m-diethylaminomethyl ani-
line afforded product 8p. Additionally, m-amino-
methylbenzamide was coupled with 5 to affordproduct 8q.
The Boc protecteddiamines 7a–b, 7d–f, anddiamine 7c
usedfor the synthesis of 8l, 8o, 8r–t, and 8p, respectively,
were prepared from the corresponding carboxamido
anilines 6a–f by reduction with lithium aluminum
hydride in THF followed by Boc protection of the pri-
mary amine (Scheme 2). Additionally, the Boc protected
were obtainedfrom aminoalkylphenyl
R groups.
Whereas the p-aminoethylphenyl, o-aminomethylphe-
nyl, and m-aminomethylphenylmethyl analogues (8h–j,
respectively) were poorly potent, the p-aminomethyl-
phenyl analogue 8k showedactivity (IC 50=3.64 mM) at
least as goodas leadcompound 2. However, the corre-
sponding m-aminomethyl analogue, 8l hadan IC
of
50
0.25 mM, a 10-foldimprovement in potency compared
to 2 and 8k.8
Next we decided to use 8l as the starting point for a
study of the replacement of the biphenylamide sub-
stitutent. Over 50 amide analogues 12 (Scheme 3) were
prepared, and a subset of these is shown in Table 2. In
this series, substitution on the terminal phenyl ring (12a–
c) or extending the rings by insertion of a methylene
group (12d,e) ledto less potent compounds, suggesting a
binding pocket of limited size. Replacement of the termi-
nal phenyl ring by an aliphatic ring or chain (12f,g) also
decreases the activity. Several other lipophilic mono- or
bicyclic aromatic groups at various linker lengths also
Scheme 2. (a) LAH, THF; (b) Boc2O, THF: 90–95%; (c) 2 N HCl in
Et2O, 74–96%; (e) HONH2, pyridine, 93%; (f) H2, PtO2, EtOH–
CHCl3 (10:1), 95%.