7952
M. Bosco et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 7949–7952
6. Congreve, M. S.; Davison, E. C.; Fuhry, M.-A. M.;
dd, J=12.6, 3.9 Hz, H%-6), 3.95–4.05 (2H, m, H-3+H-4).
13C NMR (62.9 MHz, 300 K, D2O) l 29.19 (J=131 Hz,
C-7), 58.84, 59.99 (J=2 Hz, C-2), 63.14, 74.90, 76.02
(J=8.5 Hz, C-3). 31P NMR (101.2 MHz, 300 K, D2O) l
16.66 (s).
Holmes, A. B.; Payne, A. N.; Robinson, R. A.; Ward, S.
E. Synlett 1993, 663.
7. (a) Furneaux, R. H.; Limberg, G.; Tyler, P. C.; Schramm,
V. L. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 2915–2930; (b) Horenstein, B.
A.; Zabinski, R. F.; Schramm, V. L. Tetrahedron Lett.
1993, 34, 7213–7216.
8. In related examples, using simpler aryllithiums, additions
to cyclic imines appear to proceed in modest to medium
yields: Mutzer, J.; Meier, A.; Buschmann, J.; Luger, P.
Synthesis 1996, 123–132 and Ref. 7.
9. Billault, I.; Vasella, A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 1137–
1149.
10. 20 is best prepared in good yield (64%) from readily
available dimethylmethylphosphonate by lithiation (n-
BuLi), transmetallation using ZnCl2 and treatment by
phenylselenenyl chloride. All experiments were performed
at −78°C. Under these conditions, no bis selenylation was
observed.
1
3: H NMR (250 MHz, 300 K, CD3OD) l 0.89 (3H, t,
J=6.8 Hz, CH3), 1.27 (34H, m, -CH2-), 1.63 (2H, m,
-O-CH2-CH2-), 2.01 (1H, ddd, J=17, 14, 7.8 Hz, H-7),
2.10 (1H, ddd, J=17.6, 14, 6.5 Hz, H%-7), 3.48 (1H, m,
H-5), 3.59 (1H, m, H-2), 3.75 (1H, dd, J=11.7, 7 Hz,
H-6), 3.83–4.0 (4H, m, H-4+H%-6+-O-CH2), 4.0 (1H, m,
H-3). 13C NMR (62.9 MHz, 300 K, CD3OD) l 14.49,
23.78, 26.95, 27.67 (J=132 Hz, C-7), 30.53, 30.82, 32.08
(J=6.5 Hz, -O-CH2-CH2-), 33.12, 60.15, 61.29 (J<1 Hz,
C-2), 65.79 (J=6 Hz, -O-CH2-CH2-), 65.90, 76.96, 80.55
(J=8 Hz, C-3). 31P NMR (101.2 MHz, 300 K, CD3OD)
l 19.72 (s).
1
4: H NMR (400 MHz, 300 K, CD3OD) (ꢀ2:1 mixture
of rotamers. Signals which could be attributed to major
and minor rotamers are listed as ‘M’ and ‘m’, respec-
tively) l 0.88 (M) (3H, t, J=6.9 Hz, CH3), 1.19–1.43
(34H, m, -CH2-), 1.61 (2H, m, -O-CH2-CH2-), 1.80 (M)
(ꢀ0.66H, ddd, J=17.3, 15.2, 1.9 Hz, H-7), 1.93 (m)
(ꢀ0.33H, m, H-7), 2.11(m) (ꢀ1H, s, -C(O)-CH3), 2.13
(M) (ꢀ2H, s, -C(O)-CH3), 2.50 (M) (ꢀ0.66H, dt, J=
15.5, 12.1 Hz, H%-7), 3.67(m) (0.33H, m, H-6), 3.79 (M)
(ꢀ0.66H, dd, J=10.7, 3.9 Hz, H-6), 3.81–3.92 (ꢀ3.3H,
m), 3.96 (M) (ꢀ0.66H, dd, J=5.7, 3.9 Hz, H-5), 4.02–
4.10 (1H, m), 4.11 (M) (ꢀ0.66H, broad s, H-4), 4.19 (m)
(ꢀ0.33H, broad s, H-4), 4.38 (M) (ꢀ0.66H, broad s,
H-3), 4.42 (m) (ꢀ0.33H, broad s, H-3). 31P NMR (101.2
MHz, 300 K, CD3OD) l 19.06 (M) (ꢀ0.66P, s), 22.10
(m) (ꢀ0.33P, s).
11. All new compounds show HRMS data in agreement with
the expected structure. The a configuration in 16 was
deduced from NMR data: protons H-3 and H-4 appear
as singlets, indicating and all trans relationship for pro-
tons H-2, H-3, H-4, H-5. This was further ascertained by
comparing ROESY data for the N-PMB derivatives cor-
responding to 16 and 19 (the presence of rotamers pre-
cludes direct ROESY analysis of 16 and 19). Notable
features include: for the ‘19-derived PMB’, strong
‘through space’ interactions between H-2 and H-3/H-5,
which are absent in the other PMB derivative. The posi-
tive NOE effect between protons 3 and 7 in 5 is indicative
of an exo location for the phosphonate group. NMR
data for selected compounds are listed below:
1
1
16: H NMR (400 MHz, 393 K, C2D2Cl4) l 2.34 (1H, dt,
5: H NMR (500 MHz, 300 K, C6D6) l 1.37 (3H, d, J=7
J=15, 15, 11 Hz, H-7), 2.6 (1H, broad, H%-7), 3.60–3.71
(7H, m, H-6+2×OCH3), 3.96 (1H, broad, H%-6), 4.22 (1H,
dd, J=10, 6 Hz, H-5), 4.25 (1H, s, H-3 or H-4), 4.30 (1H,
ddd, J=10.8, 6, 2.4 Hz, H-2), 4.42 (1H, s, H-4 or H-3),
4.47 (1H, d (ABq), J=12 Hz, -OCHaHbPh), 4.45–4.65
(5H,-overlapping Abq’s, -OCH2Ph), 5.15 (1H, d (ABq),
J=12 Hz, -C(ꢀO)OCHaHbPh), 5.24 (1H, d (ABq), J=12
Hz, -C(ꢀO)OCHaHbPh), 7.3–7.4 (20H, m, Ph).
Hz, CH3), 2.2 (1H, ddd, J=20.5, 11.5, 9 Hz, H-7), 3.02
(1H, ddd, J=17, 11.5, 7 Hz, H-8), 3.27 (3H, d, 10.5 Hz,
-OCH3), 3.29 (3H, d, 10.5 Hz, -OCH3), 3.52 (1H,
dd, J=9.5, 6 Hz, H-6), 3.58 (1H, t, J=9.5 Hz, H%-6),
3.93 (1H, broad s, H-3), 4.18 (1H, Abq, J=11.5 Hz,
-OCH2Ph), 4.23 (1H, ddd, J=15.5, 9, 3.5 Hz, H-2), 4.26
(1H, Abq, J=12 Hz, -OCH2Ph), 4.28 (1H, broad s, H-4),
4.30 (1H, Abq, J=9, 6 Hz, H-5), 7.06–7.33 (15H, m, Ph).
12. Selenoxide elimination is known to be syn indicating a
7(S) starting selenide. The other isomer should then give
rise to E-18. The observed E/Z mixture may result from
equilibration prior or following selenenic acid elimina-
tion. We favour the first possibility, considering the
strong acidic character of proton H-7 in the selenoxide
derived from 15.
1: 1H NMR (250 MHz, 300 K, D2O) l 3.79 (1H, dd,
J=9.4, 3.6 Hz, H-6), 3.90 (1H, m, H-5), 3.97 (1H, dd,
J=9.4, 3.7 Hz, H%-6), 4.12 (1H, t, J=5.3 Hz, H-4), 4.78
(1H, t, J=5.3 Hz, H-3), 7.73 (1H, broad s, H-2).
2: 1H NMR (250 MHz, 300 K, D2O) l 1.98 (2H, dd,
J=17.2, 7.3 Hz, H-1+H%-1), 3.52 (1H, m, H-5), 3.59 (1H,
m, H-2), 3.79 (1H, dd, J=12.6, 6.2 Hz, H-6), 3.90 (1H,