Y. Gwon et al.
Polymer 229 (2021) 124004
[34,35]. Like CPs, P-dots have an absorption wavelength in the visible
region, and their ROS generation under visible-light irradiation is far
less restricted than inorganic photocatalysts. P-dots as well as CPs have
been used as photocatalysts for H2 generation [36–38]. P-dots, however,
were located on the g-C3N4 surface to assist the H2 production of the
g-C3N4. In addition, hollow P-dots have been reported to be more effi-
cient in photocatalytic reaction than their pristine polymer [39].
In this work, we wanted to elucidate CP-based photocatalysis. ROS
generation was investigated by synthesizing four CPs with various
backbone structures, followed by fabricating CPs into P-dots. The two
main structural advantages of the P-dot form are its high surface area
and its good water-dispersibility, resulting from the nanosized spherical
shape. This enables the reactants (here, water molecules) and products
(here, ROS or H2) to easily access and form the catalytic sites on the P-
dots. In addition, by careful combination of the donor and acceptor
units, it was possible to finely tune the P-dots’ optical properties. Most
nanosized photocatalysts are only reused with difficulty after the pho-
tocatalytic reaction because of their small size and particulate shape. To
facilitate reuse after photocatalysis, we used a paper-based photo-
catalyst containing CPs [40,41].
2 M K2CO3 was added slowly, and then Pd(PPh3)4 (0.05 g, 0.04 mmol)
was added and reacted at 80 ◦C for 72 h. After the reaction, the mixture
was poured into methanol to precipitate and the precipitate was isolated
by filtration and purified in a Soxhlet apparatus with methanol and
acetone (yield 360 mg, 77%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 7.93 (m),
7.46 (m), 4.03 (m), 1.58 (m), 1.25 (m), 0.86 ppm (m). 13C NMR (CDCl3)
δ = 154.39, 150.58, 130.58, 130.13, 127.57, 117.12, 69.52, 31.8, 29.7,
29.37, 29.28,29.25, 29.23, 26, 22.65, 14.11 ppm. Anal. Calcd. for
C28H40N2O2S: C, 71.75%; H, 8.60%; N, 5.98%; O, 6.83%; S, 6.84%;
Found: C, 69.1%; H, 8.50%; N, 4.97%; S, 5.96%.
Poly(2,5-dioctyloxyphenylene-alt-bisthienylbenzithiadiazole)
(P8BTB) Compounds 3 (0.422 g, 1.0 mmol) and 6 (0.458 g, 1.0 mmol)
were dissolved in THF and toluene. The subsequent procedure was the
same as that used for P8BT synthesis (yield 429 mg, 68%). 1H NMR (300
MHz, CDCl3) δ = 8.17 (m), 7.9 (m), 7.6 (m), 7.36 (m), 4.19 (m), 1.61
(m), 1.25 (m), 0.89 ppm (m). 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ = 29.7, 29.29, 22.67,
14.11 ppm. Anal. Calcd. for C36H44N2O2S3: C, 68.31%; H, 7.01%; N,
4.43%; S, 15.20%; Found: C, 69.1%; H, 8.80%; N, 4.14%; S, 13.4%.
Poly(9,9-dihexylfluorene-alt-benzithiadiazole)
(F6BT)
9,9-
Dihexylfluorene-2,7-diboronic acid bis(1,3-propanediol) ester (0.502
g, 1.0 mmol) and compound 4 (0.291 g, 1.0 mmol) were dissolved in
THF and toluene. The subsequent procedure was the same as that used
for P8BT synthesis (yield 0.30 g, 64%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ =
8.11-7.96 (m), 2.16 (m), 2.0 (m), 1.54 (m), 1.25 (m), 1.7 (m), 0.80 ppm
(m). 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ = 31.55, 29.7, 22.64, 14.08 ppm. Anal. Calcd.
for C31H34N2S: C, 79.7%; H, 7.34%; N, 6.0%; S, 6.87%; Found: C, 78.1%;
H, 7.90%; N, 5.60%; S, 6.18%.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
2,1,3-Benzothiadiazole, 1-bromooctane, 2-(tributylstannyl)thio-
phene, tetrahydrofuran (THF), toluene, hydroquinone, N-bromosucci-
nimide (NBS), N,N-dimethyl-4-nitrosoaniline (RNO), Br2, KOH, K2CO3,
9,9-dihexylfluorene-2,7-diboronic acid bis(1,3-propanediol) ester,
methylene blue (MB), and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals. All the reagents and solvents
were used without further purification. The compounds 1,4-bis(octy-
loxy) benzene (1), 1,4-dibromo-2,5-bis(octyloxy) benzene (2), 2,5-bis
(octyloxy)phenyldiboronic acid (3), 4,7-dibromo-2,1,3-benzothiadazole
(4), 4,7-di-2-thienyl-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (5), and 4,7-bis(5-bromo-2-
thienyl)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (6) were synthesized according to pre-
viously reported methods that are briefly described in the Supporting
Information [42–44].
Poly(9,9-dihexylfluorene-alt-bisthienylbenzithiadiazole)
(F6BTB) 9,9-Dihexylfluorene-2,7-diboronic acid bis(1,3-propanediol)
ester (0.502 g, 1.0 mmol) and compound 6 (0.458 g, 1.0 mmol) were
dissolved in THF and toluene. The subsequent procedure was the same
as that used for P8BT synthesis (yield 0.49 g, 78%). 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) δ = 8.16 (m), 8.14 (m), 7.68 (m), 2.03 (m), 1.56 (m), 1.25 (m),
1.1 (m), 0.80 ppm (m). 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ = 31.81, 29.71, 29.37, 29.25,
22.7, 22.61, 14.08 ppm. Anal. Calcd. for C39H39N2S3: C, 74.1%; H,
6.22%; N, 4.43%; S, 15.2%; Found: C, 72.1%; H, 5.90%; N,4.14%; S,
14.9%.
2.4. Removal of Pd catalyst
2.2. Characterization
CP (150 mg) was dissolved in chloroform (50 mL), followed by
addition of thiourea (600 mg) and the mixture was stirred for 24 h. The
thiourea was removed by filtration and the filtrate was concentrated
under reduced pressure; the polymer was then precipitated in methanol
and dried in a vacuum oven.
1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recor-
ded on a Fourier-300 spectrometer at Korea Basic Science Institute
(Bruker, MA, USA). Ultraviolet and visible (UV–vis) absorption spectra
were recorded on a Lambda 35 spectrometer (PerkinElmer, CT, USA).
Fluorescence spectra were obtained using a Cary Eclipse fluorescence
spectrophotometer (Varian, CA, USA) equipped with a Xe flash-lamp
excitation source. Elemental analysis (EA) was performed on an
Elemental Analyzer EA 1108 (Fisons Instruments, UK). The molecular
weights (MWs) of polymers were determined by gel-permeation chro-
matography (GPC), with THF as an eluent with a polystyrene standard
(Youngin Scientific, Korea). The nanoparticle images were obtained
using a field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Hitachi S-
4800, Japan), and the size was determined using dynamic light scat-
tering (DLS, Malvern Zetasizer, UK). A solar simulator (PEC-L01, Peccell
Technologies, Japan) was used for visible light. The residual Pd catalyst
in CPs was determined with an inductively coupled plasma mass-
spectrometer (ICP-MS, ELAN DRC II, PerkinElmer). The contact angles
of CPs and their nanoparticles was obtained with a droplet shape
analyzer (DSA 100, KRÜSS, Germany) by coating them on glass slides.
2.5. Preparation of P-dots
CP was dissolved in THF and injected into distilled water under
sonication. After 30 min sonication, N2 gas was blown to remove THF for
30 min. Then, a P-dot solution was prepared after filtration with a 0.45
μ
m syringe filter. Four kinds of P-dots (denoted as P8BT-, P8BTB-, F6BT-,
and F6BTB-dots) were fabricated from four CPs (P8BT, P8BTB, F6BT,
and F6BTB), respectively.
2.6. ROS generation of P-dots
To evaluate the ROS generation of the P-dot solution, an RNO dye
was used as a ROS indicator. The P-dot solution was mixed with RNO
and then irradiated with white light for varying time periods. ROS
generation was determined by investigating the changes in UV–vis ab-
sorption at 430 nm, resulting from the reduced RNO by ROS.
2.3. Polymerization
Poly(2,5-dioctyloxyphenylene-alt-benzithiadiazole)
(P8BT)
2.7. Electrochemical cyclic voltammetry (CV) [45]
Compounds 3 (0.422 g, 1.0 mmol) and 4 (0.291 g, 1.0 mmol) were
dissolved in mixed solvents of THF and toluene. An aqueous solution of
The CV of CPs was investigated on a three-electrode electrochemical
2