Concerning kinetic resolution by the Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation
reaction
Hamish S. Christie, David P. G. Hamon* and Kellie L. Tuck
Chemistry Department, University of Adelaide, S.A. 5005, Australia. E-mail: dhamon@chemistry.adelaide.edu.au
Received (in Cambridge, UK) 6th August 1999, Accepted 31st August 1999
The transition state for the product-determining step in the
Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxlation reaction is not prod-
uct-like, and effective kinetic resolution can occur when one
face of a chiral alkene is hindered.
the major diol was then determined as already described. In two
separate experiments, conducted at 0 °C, the reactions were
stopped at 15 and 94% conversion respectively. The ee for the
remaining alkene, for the former reaction, was determined as
~ 4% and, for the latter, as ~ 86%. This computes to an E of ~ 2
in each case. This value of E is too small for effective kinetic
resolution. Clearly the TS of the product-determining step is not
product-like.
It can be reasoned that, if the product-determining step in the
AD reaction is reactant-like and if the alkene is highly
enantiofacially directing, then a kinetic resolution should be
effective when there is considerable difference in the ease of
approach to the two faces of a chiral alkene.11 Such an effect has
been demonstrated12 recently for one molecule, which displays
axial chirality. Recently we completed13 an asymmetric synthe-
sis of grandisol in which the key step is the kinetic resolution of
the primary allylic alcohol 4 by a Sharpless AE reaction. The
Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxlation (AD)1 and asymmetric
epoxidation (AE)2 reactions have proved to be very effective
means whereby asymmetry can be introduced into molecules
starting from prochiral alkenes and allylic alcohols respectively.
The AE reaction has also proved useful for effecting kinetic
resolution of chiral allylic alcohols. However, with only a few
exceptions, the AD reaction has not been effective for carrying
out kinetic resolutions and the reasons for this are not well
understood.1
It is known3 that the AD reaction of 1-phenylcyclohexene
proceeds with high asymmetric induction. Therefore, reaction
of these reagents with 1-phenyl-4-tert-butylcyclohexene 1
would also be expected to proceed with high asymmetric
induction but two diastereomeric products should result. For
instance with AD-mix-b the enantioenriched diastereomers 2
and 3 should form (Scheme 1). If these molecules exist
predominantly in the expected chair conformers, the diaster-
eomer 2 has the phenyl group in an equatorial position whereas
the phenyl group in the other diastereomer 3 has an axial
orientation. The diastereomer 3 will be several kJ mol21 higher
in energy than the diastereomer 2.4 Therefore, if the transition
state (TS) for the product-determining step in the AD reaction is
product-like, there would be a considerable difference in the
rate of formation of these two diastereomers, and an effective
kinetic resolution should be possible.
The AD reaction on the alkene 1 was performed following
Sharpless’s recommended procedure5 for tri-substituted alkenes
(AD-mix-b, MsNH2, ButOH–H2O, 0 °C). Equal quantities of
the diols 2 and 3,6 eluting in that order, were obtained, in 84%
yield after ‘flash’ silica gel chromatography. The enantiomeric
purity of each diol was determined by the use of NMR chiral
shift reagent experiments. The diol 2 from the AD reaction had
> 99% ee7 and the diol 3 had > 95% ee.8 The racemic diols
were obtained using the Sharpless method with quinuclidine as
ligand to give the racemic diols in a ratio of ~ 4.5+1.
key feature in that resolution is that the molecule presents both
an open convex face and a more-hindered, concave face to the
reagents. The reaction proceeds to give products of attack on
one face only, the convex face. This system appeared suitable to
pursue the study of the kinetic resolution by the AD reaction.
Indeed, the alkene 5 appears ideal for this study. Control of
product formation in the Sharpless AD reaction should be
determined mainly by the enantiofacial selectivity of the styrene
moiety. The concave face of this molecule is hindered, so there
should be a considerable difference in the rate of reaction of the
enantiomers of this molecule and kinetic resolution should be
effective.
Reaction of the bicycloketone 614 with PhMgBr and Et2O at
0 °C gave, in 88% yield, a single racemic alcohol, mp 56–58 °C,
presumed to be the diastereomer 7 (Scheme 2). Dehydration of
this alcohol (CH2Cl2, Et3N, MsCl, 0 °C) gave as an oil the
alkene 5 (81%).15 A kinetic resolution of this substrate was
examined in two separate experiments with 26 and 50% oxidant
respectively. However, because the alkene 5 is somewhat
unstable, in each case the ees for both the diol (presumed to be
enantiomer 8, based on the application of Sharpless’ mnemonic)
and the recovered alkene 5 were determined, after separation, in
the following way. The diol 8 was converted to the mono
Mosher ester derivative [(+)-MTPA, CH2Cl2, DCC, DMAP]
and the ee determined.16 The alkene was converted to the same
diol (presumed to be mainly 9) by the achiral dihydroxylation
The kinetic resolution was also studied under the normal
conditions for the AD reaction and the relative rates for the
enantiomers (E) were determined following a literature proce-
dure9 which is related to the relationship derived by Kagan.10
The percentage conversion of the racemic substrate was
followed by NMR spectroscopy. The remaining alkene was
separated from the diols 2 and 3. The ee of the remaining alkene
1 was determined by conversion, using the achiral dihydroxyla-
tion reaction, into the same diols 2 and 3. The enantiopurity of
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1989–1990
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 1999
1989