M. A. Clark et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 347–349
349
might be transformed to the corresponding ketone
Acknowledgements
without disturbing the adjacent acyloxy group. After
screening a variety of deoximation procedures, the pro-
cess of acid-catalyzed transoximation using excess acet-
aldehyde,8 which avoids both hydrolytic and
nucleophilic conditions, smoothly transformed 14 to
acetoxyketone 15 in 74% yield.
We thank the US National Institutes of Health (DK
55823) for financial support. The Cornell NMR Facility
is supported by the National Science Foundation (CHE
7904825, PGM 8018643) and NIH (RR02002).
Three additional oxazolines (Scheme 3) were synthe-
sized to test the scope and generality of this new
methodology. Like 9, the previously prepared6 phenyl-
substituted bicyclic oxazoline 16 was smoothly oxidized
(50°C, 24 h) and rearranged (reflux, 1.5 h) in one
operation to 17, which could be deprotected using
acetaldehyde to the known9 2-benzoyloxycyclohex-
anone 18.
References
1. Review: Gant, T. G.; Meyers, A. I. Tetrahedron 1994, 50,
2297–2360.
2. Ando, O.; Satake, H.; Itoi, K.; Sato, A.; Nakajima, M.;
Takahashi, S.; Haruyama, H.; Okuma, Y.; Kinoshita, Y.;
Enokita, R. J. Antibiot. 1991, 44, 1165–1168.
3. Clark, M. A.; Schoenfeld, R. C.; Ganem, B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10425–10426.
Saccharide-derived oxazolines 19 and 22 were prepared
from 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-d-glucose and 2-acetamido-
4. Aue, D. H.; Thomas, D. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3855–
3862.
2-deoxy-d-galactose, respectively, by
a
known
5. (a) Keana, J. F. W.; Lee, T. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975,
97, 1273–1274; (b) Lee, T. D.; Keana, J. F. W. J. Org.
Chem. 1976, 41, 3237–3241.
6. Tiecco, M.; Testaferri, L.; Marini, F.; Temperini, A.;
Bagnoli, L.; Santi, C. Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 4131–
4140.
7. Kishi, Y.; Aratani, M.; Tanino, H.; Fukuyama, T.; Goto,
T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1972, 64–65.
8. Brehm, M.; Dauben, W. G.; Kohler, P.; Lichtenthaler, F.
W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 1271–1273.
9. Augustine, R. L. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 581–582.
10. Nakabayashi, S.; Warren, C. D.; Jeanloz, R. W. Carbo-
hydr. Res. 1986, 150, C7–C10.
method.10 Oxazolines 19 and 22 were oxidized
(CH3CN, rt, 9–48 h) and the intermediate azoxy dimers
were rearranged in situ (50°C, 12–15 h) to the corre-
sponding acetoxyoximes 2011 and 23, respectively.
However, both 20 and 23 were prone to decomposition
under the acidic transoximation conditions. Interest-
ingly, a recently reported oxidative deoximation proce-
dure using the Dess–Martin periodinane12 transformed
20 and 23 to the 2-nitroglucal and galactal derivatives
21 and 24, respectively.13 A related oxidative elimina-
tion of a-haloketoximes to a-nitroolefins has been
reported.14
11. Lemieux, R. U.; Nagabushan, T. L.; Gunner, S. W. Can.
J. Chem. 1968, 46, 405–411.
In summary, a general procedure has been devised for
the oxidation of substituted oxazolines to a-
acyloxyketoximes and the derived a-acyloxyketones. In
the case of oxazolines derived from 2-acetamido-2-
deoxyhexoses, the resulting oximes can be converted to
nitroglycals, which are novel monosaccharide deriva-
tives of potential use in the assembly of di- and
oligosaccharides.15
12. (a) Chaurhuri, S. S.; Akamanchi, K. G. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 3209–3212; (b) Chaurhuri, S. S.; Akamanchi, K.
G. Synthesis 1999, 760–764.
1
13. For 21: H NMR l (300 MHz, CDCl3) 8.32 (s, 1H), 5.99
(m, 1H), 5.23 (t, 1H, J=2 Hz), 4.70–4.75 (m, 1H), 4.46
(dd, 1H, J=12, 8 Hz), 4.16 (dd, 1H, J=12, 4 Hz), 2.11 (s,
6H), 2.1 (s, 3H); 13C NMR 170.4, 109.2 (2), 155.6, 128.3,
76.3, 65.7, 61.5, 60.5, 21.0, 20.9, 20.8.
For 24: 1H NMR l 8.22 (s, 1H), 6.30 (m, 1H), 5.47 (t,
1H, J=4.3 Hz), 4.57–4.62 (m, 1H), 4.46 (dd, 1H, J=12.4,
9.1 Hz), 4.32 (dd, 1H, J=12.4, 3.2 Hz), 2.12 (s, 6H), 2.09
(s, 3H); 13C NMR 170.7, 169.7, 169.4, 155.6, 129.2, 75.4,
64.2, 60.9, 60.6, 21.0, 20.7 (2).
Representative procedure: To a solution of 19 (0.71 g,
2.2 mmol) in CH3CN (70 mL) was added MCPBA
(1.03 g, 80–85% pure). The solution was stirred at rt for
9 h, then heated at 50°C for 12 h. After cooling and
concentration in vacuo, the residue was dissolved in
EtOAc (80 mL), washed with sat NaHSO3, satd
NaHCO3, and satd NaCl. The organic phase was dried
(Na2SO4) and concentrated. Flash chromatography (2:3
EtOAc:hexanes) afforded 0.43 g (55%) of pure 20.
14. Sakakibara, T.; Ikeda, Y.; Sudoh, R. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1982, 55, 635–636.
15. See for example: Sakakibara, T.; Tachimori, Y.; Sudoh,
R. Carbohydr. Res. 1984, 131, 197–208.