C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
In conclusion, the newly synthesized azobenzene-lacto- and
galactopyranoside derivatives exhibit rather slow cis f trans
thermal relaxation processes in aqueous solution. Lectin binding
studies of bivalent derivative 6 with PNA, using ITC, have shown
a biphasic binding profile, corresponding to a cooperative nature
of the binding process. Although a number of multivalent glycosides
have been tested previously, no report concerning the existence of
cooperativity is reported so far. To the best of our knowledge, the
present observation is the first report that such phenomena can exist
in glycoside-lectin interactions.
Acknowledgment. This paper is dedicated to the memory of
Dr. Darshan Ranganathan. We are grateful to CSIR (New Delhi)
for financial support. O.S. thanks UGC for a research fellowship.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures of
5-10 and method of ITC studies (PDF). This material is available free
Figure 1. Binding profiles of the lactose derivative 6 in the trans and the
PS (inset) isomeric states. The cooperativity is seen to be more in the case
of the PS mixture than in the trans isomer.
References
(1) (a) Sharon, N.; Lis, H. Science 1989, 246, 227. (b) Varki, A. Glycobiology
1993, 3, 97. (c) Dwek, R. A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 683.
(2) Drickamer, K. Nature: Struct. Biol. 1995, 2, 437.
Table 2. Thermodynamic Parameters for Binding of PNA to 6a
(3) Lee, Y. C.; Lee, R. T. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 321.
(4) (a) Kempen, H. J. M.; Hoes, C.; van Boom, J. H.; Spanjer, H. H.; de
Lange, J.; Langendoen, A.; van Berkel, T. J. C. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 27,
1306. (b) Fenderson, B. A.; Zehavi, U.; Hakomori, S. J. Exp. Med. 1984,
160, 1591. (c) Sakai, S.; Sasaki, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1587.
(d) Kretzschmar, G.; Sprengard, U.; Kunz, H.; Bartnik, E.; Schmidt, W.;
Toepfer, A.; Ho¨rsch, B.; Krause, M.; Seiffge, D. Tetrahedron 1995, 47,
13015.
(5) (a) Spaltenstein, A.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
686. (b) Roy, R.; Laferriere, C. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990,
1709. (c) Mortell, K. H.; Gingras, M.; Kiessling, L. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 12053.
trans
PS mixture
Kb1 (×10-4
)
5.1 ( 0.2
4.9 ( 0.3
∆H1
-8.5 ( 0.1
-6.4 ( 0.02
-2.1 ( 0.1
118 ( 7.8
-7.7 ( 0.1
-6.4 ( 0.03
-1.3 ( 0.1
419 ( 15.0
-11.8 ( 0.2
-9.0 ( 0.02
-2.8 ( 0.2
∆G1
Τ∆S1
Kb2 (×10-4
)
∆H2
-12.5 ( 0.1
-8.2 ( 0.04
-4.2 ( 0.1
∆G2
Τ∆S2
(6) (a) Aoi, K.; Itoh, K.; Okada, M. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 5391. (b)
Lindhorst, T. K.; Kieburg, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35,
1953. (c) Roy, R. Polym. News 1996, 21, 226. (d) Jayaraman, N.;
Nepogodiev, S. A.; Stoddart, J. F. Chem. Eur. J. 1997, 2, 1193. (e) Haataja,
S.; Finne, J.; Magnusson, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6974. (f) Yi,
D.; Lee, R. T.; Longo, P.; Boger, E. T.; Lee, Y, C.; Petri, W. A., Jr.;
Schnaar, R. L. S. Glycobiology 1998, 8, 1037.
(7) (a) Shinkai, S.; Nakaji, T.; Nishida, Y.; Ogawa, T.; Manabe, O. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5860. (b) Anzai, J-i.; Osa, T. Tetrahedron 1994,
50, 4039. (c) Kunitake, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 709.
(8) (a) Erlanger, B. F. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1980, 5, 110. (b) Balasubramanian,
D.; Subramani, S.; Kumar, C. Nature (London) 1975, 254, 252. (c) Willner,
I. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 347. (d) Behrendt, R.; Renner, C.; Schenk,
M.; Wang, F.; Wachtreitl, J.; Oesterhelt, D.; Moroder, L. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2771.
(9) Delaire, J. A.; Nakatani, K. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1817.
(10) Ameerunisha, S.; Zacharias, P. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995,
1679.
(11) Photoirradiations were performed on aqueous solutions of 5-10 using a
water-cooled high-pressure 250 W Hg lamp that transmitted light between
320 and 380 nm after passing through a set of band-pass chemical filters:
Kasha, M. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1948, 38, 929. Mohler, N. M.; Loofbourow,
J. R. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1952, 42, 499.
(12) (a) Biessen, E. A.; Vietsch, H.; Van Berkel, T. J. Circulation 1995, 91,
1847. (b) Dam, T. K.; Roy, R.; Das, S. K.; Oscarson, S.; Brewer, C. F. J.
Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 14223. (c) Dimick, S. M.; Powell, S. C.; McMahon,
S. A.; Moothoo, D. N.; Naismith, J. H.; Toone, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 10286.
(13) (a) Reddy, G. B.; Srinivas, V. R.; Ahmad, N.; Surolia, A. J. Biol. Chem.
1999, 274, 4500. (b) Swamy, M. J.; Gupta, D.; Mahanta, S. K.; Surolia,
A. Carbohydr. Res. 1991, 213, 59.
(14) Banerjee, R.; Das, K.; Ravishankar, R.; Suguna, K.; Surolia, A.; Vijayan,
M. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 259, 281.
a Values of Kb and ∆H, ∆G, and Τ∆S are expressed in M-1 and kcal
mol-1, respectively. The studies were performed in 20 mM phosphate buffer,
pH 7.4, and 150 mM NaCl. The titrations were done at 298 K.
higher affinity for PNA than galactose.13b As shown in Figure 1,
the recognition of bivalent 6 by PNA exhibits pronounced coop-
erativity. The experimentally obtained thermodynamic parameters
are given in Table 2. The distance between 4,4′-positions of the
azobenzene unit is about 9 Å, while that between the anomeric
oxygen at the reducing end is not expected to be greater than 17
Å. Consequently, a true cluster effect for its binding to the PNA
molecule is not observed, as the least separation between these
binding sites is 69 Å.14 Even in the absence of a cluster effect, we
still observe a much higher binding constant (Kb1 ) 5.1 × 104
M-1) for the low-affinity part of the binding reaction, when
compared to 7, 8, and 10 (Kb ) 3.5 × 103, 1.7 × 103, and 1.9 ×
103 M-1, respectively).15
Although the binding invokes interaction of the ligand with the
separate unconnected subunits of tetrameric PNA, the geometry of
the trans-azobenzene derivative 6 is such that a mere separation of
17 Å between its two lactose units promotes a cooperativity during
the reaction. Further, the orientation of 6 increases the affinity of
the second site in a striking manner. This can be explained on the
basis that the binding of the first lactose moiety to a subunit of the
first PNA tetramer aligns the second moiety in an orientation that
increases the affinity for the recognition of the latter by another
PNA molecule. Irrespective of the origin of the cooperativity, the
affinity becomes even more pronounced in the cis-isomer (Kb2),
where the distance between the two lactosides is close to 10 Å.16
(15) 7, 8, and 10 had shown that the binding profiles were monophasic in
nature, indicating the absence of any cooperativity, probably due to the
fact that galactose itself exhibits low affinity for PNA. Low aqueous
solubilities precluded ITC studies of 5 and 9.
(16) It should be mentioned here that the contributions of the cis and trans
forms were not taken into account separately during the ITC analysis of
the PS mixture of bivalent derivative 6 because of practical difficulties.
JA0173066
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 10, 2002 2125