1842
D. J. Aldous et al.
LETTER
N
N
O
O
H
H
N
NR
O
NR
O
O
N
a
a
H
H
H
R
Ph
N
Ph
N
O
Ph
N
O
H
H
H
H
O
O
O
O
O
(4)
endo
exo
R
Me
Ph
MeO2C
CO2Me
CO2Me
35% (41%)
50% (45%)
33% (19%)
26% (13%)
MeO2C
a
CO2Me
b
H
CO2Me
H
H
CO2Me
CO2Me
H
CO2Me
H
CO2Me
H
Ph
N
O
CO2Me
Ph
N
O
CO2Me
Ph
N
Ph
N
H
H
H
H
O
H
O
H
O
H
O
O
O
endo
20% (20%)
exo
31% (30%)
50% (0%)
9% (6%)
Scheme 3 a) PTSA, THF, reflux, 24 h; b) PTSA, CHCl3, reflux, 24 h. Yields in parentheses are those obtained by generating the ylid directly
from morpholinone under standard thermal conditions.2a–d
Rachwal, B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1987, 791.
(b) Katritzky, A. R.; Rachwal, S.; Rachwal, B. J. Chem. Soc.,
mit efficient trapping with a range of doubly activated
dipolarophiles.
Perkin Trans. 1 1987, 799. (c) Katritzky, A. R.;
Yannakopoulou, K.; Lue, P.; Rasala, D.; Urogdi, L. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1989, 225. (d) Subsequent to the
completion of our studies and following the publication of
our carbamate work (ref.4) we were contacted by Professor
Katritzky suggesting the very benzotriazole system we had
been investigating. We thank him for his interest in this
work.
Acknowledgement
E. M.-N. H. thanks Rhône Poulenc Rorer Limited for financial sup-
port.
(7) (5S)-N-(1’-Benzotriazolylmethyl)-5-phenylmorpholin-2-
one(4): (5S)-5-Phenylmorpholin-2-one 1 (474 mg, 2.7
mmol, 1 equiv) and benzotriazole (319 mg, 2.7 mmol, 1
equiv) were dissolved in water–ethanol 1:1 (5 mL).
Formaldehyde (37 wt% solution in water, 0.2 mL, 1 equiv)
was added via syringe and the resulting solution was stirred
at r.t. overnight. The solution was then cooled to 5 °C and the
resultant precipitate was filtered and washed with 1:1 aq
ethanol and dried in vacuo giving a colourless solid (645 mg,
78%), mp 112–113 °C; [ ]19D +82.0 (c 0.75, CHCl3); (Found
C, 65.92; H, 5.25; N, 17.94. C17H16N4O2 requires C, 66.22;
H, 5.23; N, 18.16%.); max (KBr disc): 175, 1456 cm–1; 1H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): = 8.05 (1 H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.69
(1 H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.55–7.38 (7 H, m), 5.64 (1 H, d, J =
14.7 Hz), 5.40 (1 H, d, J = 14.7 Hz), 4.30–4.46 (4 H, m), 3.66
(1 H, d, J = 16.8 Hz) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO):
= 168.5, 144.6, 137.3, 133.5, 128.6, 128.3, 128.2, 128.0,
127.9, 123.9, 118.9, 110.4, 70.7, 63.9, 57.6, 50.2 ppm; MS
References
(1) Current address: Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mail Code:
N2334, Route 202-206, P.O. Box 6800, Bridgewater, NJ,
08807-0800, USA.
(2) (a) Anslow, A. S.; Harwood, L. M.; Phillips, H.; Watkin, D.
J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2, 169. (b) Anslow, A. S.;
Harwood, L. M.; Phillips, H.; Watkin, D. J. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1991, 2, 997. (c) Anslow, A. S.; Harwood, L.
M.; Phillips, H.; Watkin, D. J.; Wong, L. F. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1991, 2, 1343. (d) Harwood, L. M.; Macro, J.;
Watkin, D. J.; Williams, C. E.; Wong, L. F. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1992, 3, 1127. (e) Harwood, L. M.; Lilley, I. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 537. (f) Harwood, L. M.; Kitchen,
L. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 6603. (g) Anslow, A. S.; Cox,
G. G.; Harwood, L. M. Chemistry of Heterocyclic
Compounds 1995, 10, 1393. (h) Harwood, L. M.; Lilley, I.
A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 1557. (i) Anslow, A.
S.; Harwood, L. M.; Lilley, I. A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1995, 6, 2465. (j) Harwood, L. M.; Lilley, I. A. Synlett 1996,
1010. (k) Alker, D.; Hamblett, G.; Harwood, L. M.;
Robertson, S. M.; Watkin, D. J.; Williams, C. E.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 6089. (l) Harwood, L. M.;
Robertson, S. M. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2641.
(3) Harwood, L. M.; Manage, A. C.; Robin, S.; Hopes, S. F. G.;
Watkin, D. J.; Williams, C. E. Synlett 1993, 777.
(4) Alker, D.; Harwood, L. M.; Williams, C. E. Tetrahedron
1997, 53, 12671.
(5) For a review see: Katrizky, A. R.; Lan, X.; Yang, J.;
Denisko, O. V. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 409.
(6) For examples see: (a) Katritzky, A. R.; Rachwal, S.;
+
(C.I.): m/z 120 [C6H6N3 ], 90.
(8) General Method for the Preparation of Cycloadducts:
N-(1'-Benzotriazolylmethyl)-5-phenylmorpholin-2-one 4
(1 equiv), dipolarophile (3 equiv) and para-toluenesulfonic
acid (0.5 equiv) were dissolved in dry THF, or in the case of
dimethyl fumarate, in dry chloroform. Subsequently, the
mixture was refluxed for 24 h. Removal of solvent in vacuo
yielded the crude mixture of products along with excess
dipolarophile. The cycloadducts were then purified by
column chromatography on silica, eluting with toluene/
diethyl ether. Identification of the cycloadducts was carried
out by comparison with the known products.2
Synlett 2001, No. 12, 1841–1842 ISSN 0936-5214 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York