Measurements were carried out in chloroform at 35 ꢀC at a
flow rate of 0.8 mL minꢁ1. Universal calibration with 18 PS
narrow standards ranging from 162 to 5.5 ꢂ 106 g molꢁ1 was
applied. Sample concentration was about 2 mg mLꢁ1, injection
volume 218 mL.
Acknowledgements
Prof. S. Sostero of the University of Ferrara is gratefully
acknowledged for the assistance supplied in the photochemical
studies and Dr. R. Mendichi of the Istituto per lo Studio delle
Macromolecole (ISMAC) of the National Council of Research
(CNR) for polymer characterisation.
Synthesis of the Ti complexes: general procedure
The dienes (10 mmol) were dissolved in 30 mL petroleum ether
(9, 10 and 12) or diethyl ether (11) and cooled to ꢁ10 ꢀC; n-
butyllithium (13 mmol) was added dropwise and the solution
was allowed to reach room temperature and stirred overnight.
The lithium salts of 9, 10 and 12 separated from the solution as
dusty solids, which were filtered via a cannula, washed twice
with petroleum ether, then the residual solvent was pumped
off. In the case of the diene 11 a dark solution was obtained.
The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the dark
solid obtained was washed twice with petroleum ether to
remove excess n-butyllithium, then the residual solvent was
pumped off.
The lithium salts were dissolved in 30 mL anhydrous THF
and ClSiMe3 (30 mmol) diluted in 10 mL of THF was added
dropwise. The resulting cloudy solution was stirred 6 h at
room temperature, then cooled to 0 ꢀC; a saturated solution
of NH4Cl was slowly added until separation of two phases
occurred. After separation, the aqueous solution was washed
three times with diethyl ether. The collected organic fractions
were dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered and
the solvent was removed with a rotary evaporator.
References
1
2
3
(a) Photopolymerization and Photoimaging Science and Technol-
ogy, ed. N. S. Allen, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989; (b) Radiation
Curing: Science and Technology, ed. S. P. Pappas, Plenum Press,
New York, 1992.
Photopolymerization: Fundamentals and Applications, ACS
Symposium Series, eds. A. B. Scranton, C. N. Bowman and
R. W. Peiffer, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC,
1997, vol. 673.
Photoinitiators for UV Curing. Key Products Selection Guide.
R. S. Davidson, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 1993, 69, 263.
(a) B. M. Monroe and G. C. Weed, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 435; (b)
R. S. Davidson, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 1993, 73, 81; (c) C.
Kutal, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2001, 211, 353; (d ) A. Barbieri, A.
Droghetti, S. Sostero and O. Traverso, J. Photochem. Photobiol.,
A, 1999, 129, 137.
4
5
6
7
8
9
E. Polo, A. Barbieri, S. Sostero and M. L. H. Green, Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem., 2002, 8, 405.
E. Polo, A. Barbieri and O. Traverso, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2003,
9, 324.
E. Polo, R. M. Bellabarba, G. Prini, O. Traverso and M. L. H.
Green, J. Organomet. Chem., 1999, 577, 211.
G. W. Coates and R. M. Waymouth, Science, 1995, 267, 217.
The trimethylsilyl derivatives were transferred into
a
10 G. V. Loukova and V. A. Smirnov, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2000,
329, 437.
Schlenk flask, degassed, protected from light and dissolved
in about 30 mL of CH2Cl2 ; a solution of TiCl4 (4.8 mmol)
in 5 mL CH2Cl2 was added dropwise. The reaction mixture
was stirred overnight. The solvent was then removed under
vacuum, the residue washed with petroleum ether, filtered,
and dried under reduced pressure to give a dusty solid.
Although the first synthesis of complexes 1 and 2 has been
previously reported,20 we report here the NMR characterisa-
tion, which was not reported in that paper. Furthermore, with
our procedure the yields have been significantly improved.
11 (a) G. L. Geoffroy and M. S. Wrighton, Organometallic Photo-
chemistry, Academic Press, New York, 1979; (b) J. W. Kenney,
D. R. Boone, D. R. Striplin, Y. H. Chen and K. B. Hamar, Orga-
nometallics, 1993, 12, 3671; (c) G. V. Loukova and V. V. Strelets,
J. Organomet. Chem., 2000, 606, 203; (d ) X. Wang, L. Chen,
A. Endou, M. Kubo and A. Miyamoto, J. Organomet. Chem.,
2003, 678, 156; (e) V. V. Strelets, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1992, 114,
1; ( f ) V. W.-W. Yam, G. Z. Qi and K. K. Cheung, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans., 1998, 1819; (g) V. W.-W. Yam, G. Z. Qi
and K. K. Cheung, Organometallics, 1998, 17, 5448; (h) R. W.
Harrigan, G. S. Hammond and H. B. Gray, J. Organomet.
Chem., 1974, 81, 79; (i) H. Kunkely and A. Vogler, J. Photochem.
Photobiol., A, 1999, 119, 187.
Bis(g5-indenyl)titanium dichloride (1). Purple volatile solid.
Yield 70% (from indene; 4 steps; average yield per step:
88%). Anal. calcd for C18H14Cl2Ti (349.08): C, 61.9; H, 4.0;
12 W. W. Lukens, Jr., M. R. Smith III and R. A. Anderson, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 1719.
1
Cl, 20.3; found C, 61.5; H, 4.2; Cl, 19.8. H-NMR (CDCl3):
d 7.10–7.18 (m, 2H, –CH–Cp), 7.22–7.30 (m, 4H, –CH–Cp),
7.42–7.65 (m, 4H, –ArH), 7.63–7.88 (m, 4H, –ArH).
13 D. R. Duling, J. Magn. Reson., Ser. B, 1994, 104, 105.
14 (a) S. Di Martino, S. Sostero, O. Traverso, D. Rehorek and T. J.
Kemp, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1990, 176, 107; (b) S. Sostero, D.
Rehorek, O. Traverso and E. Polo, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1993,
209, 171.
15 (a) E. Samuel and J. Vedel, Organometallics, 1989, 8, 237; (b) K.
Mach and J. B. Raynor, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1992, 683;
(c) H. Deng and K. Soga, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 1847.
16 (a) G. M. Williams and J. Schwartz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104,
1122; (b) C. S. Bajgur, S. B. Jones and J. L. Petersen, Organome-
tallics, 1985, 4, 1929; (c) F. Soleil and R. Choukroun, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 2938.
17 (a) E. Vitz and C. H. Brubaker, Jr., J. Organomet. Chem., 1974,
82, C16; (b) R. W. Harrigan, G. S. Hammond and M. B. Gray,
J. Organomet. Chem., 1974, 81, 79; (c) E. Vitz, P. J. Wagner
and C. H. Brubaker, Jr., J. Organomet. Chem., 1976, 107, 301;
(d ) G. L. Lee and C. H. Brubaker, Jr., Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1977,
25, 181; (e) M. R. M. Bruce and D. R. Tyler, Organometallics,
1985, 4, 528.
18 (a) Y. Li, D. G. Ward, S. S. Reddy and S. Collins, Macromole-
cules, 1997, 30, 1875; (b) P. A. Cameron, V. C. Gibson and
A. J. Graham, Macromolecules, 2000, 33, 4329; (c) M. H. Lee,
J.-W. Hwang, Y. Kim, J. Kim, Y. Han and Y. Do, Organometal-
lics, 1999, 18, 5124; (d ) C. Qian, W. Nie and J. Sun, Organometal-
lics, 2000, 19, 4134; (e) H. Frauenrath, H. Keul and H. Ho¨cker,
Macromolecules, 2001, 34, 14; ( f ) J. Q. Sun, Z. D. Pan, Y. Zhong,
W. Q. Hu and S. L. Yang, Eur. Polym. J., 2000, 36, 2375.
19 A. S. W. Li, K. B. Cummings, H. P. RoethLing, G. R. Buetner
and C. F. Chignell, J. Magn. Reson., 1988, 79, 140.
Bis[g5-(4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-indenyl)titanium dichloride (2).
Red-brown solid. Yield 48% (from bicyclo[4.3.0]non-6-en-8-
one; 5 steps; average yield per step: 88%). Anal. calcd for
C18H22Cl2Ti (357.14): C, 60.5; H, 6.2; Cl, 19.8; found C,
60.7; H, 6.4; Cl, 19.4. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): d 1.60–1.85 (m,
4H), 1.85–2.00 (m, 4H), 2.60–2.90 (m, 4H), 3.10–3.30 (m,
4H), 6.65 (d, J ¼ 3.0 Hz, 4H), 7.05 (t, J ¼ 3.0 Hz, 2H).
Bis[g5-(2-phenylindenyl)]titanium dichloride (3). Purple solid.
Yield 60% (from 2-indanone; 5 steps; average yield per step:
90%). Anal. calcd for C30H22Cl2Ti (501.27): C, 71.9; H, 4.4;
1
Cl, 14.2; found C, 71.5; H, 4.2; Cl, 14.8. H-NMR (CDCl3):
d 7.1–7.5 (m, 4H), 7.6–7.7 (m, 18H).
Bis[g5-(2-phenyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-indenyl)]titanium
dichloride (4). Red-brown solid. Yield 52% (from bicyclo-
[4.3.0]non-6-en-8-one; 5 steps; average yield per step: 87%).
Anal. calcd for C30H30Cl2Ti (509.33): C, 70.7; H, 5.9; Cl,
13.9; found C, 70.8; H, 6.1; Cl, 13.4. 1H-NMR (CDCl3):
d 1.50–1.90 (m, 4H, C–CH2–CH2–), 1.90–2.20 (m, 4H, C–
CH2–CH2–), 2.90–3.20 (m, 8H, –C–CH2–CH2–), 7.15 (s, 4H,
–CH–Cp), 7.30–7.50 (m, 6H, –ArH), 7.60–7.80 (m, 4H, –ArH).
20 E. Samuel, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1966, 11, 3548.
T h i s j o u r n a l i s Q T h e R o y a l S o c i e t y o f C h e m i s t r y a n d t h e
C e n t r e N a t i o n a l d e l a R e c h e r c h e S c i e n t i f i q u e 2 0 0 4
656
N e w . J . C h e m . , 2 0 0 4 , 2 8 , 6 5 2 – 6 5 6