in enantiomeric excess to 88%, but in the presence of this
ligand the reaction did not proceed as quickly as with tosylate
8 (entries 9-11).
The high enantioselectivity obtained with ligand 6 and
R-branched as well as linear aliphatic aldehydes compares
well to the frequently low to modest asymmetric inductions
reported for this class of substrates in the literature.9 Most
comparable to 6-16 are Bolm’s ferrocenyl oxazolines that
combine planar and central chirality elements and catalyze
the addition of diethylzinc to heptanal in 87% ee at 5 mol
% ligand loading.16 In contrast, Hou’s bidentate ferrocenyl
oxazolines only provided a 71% ee for diethylzinc addition
to cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde.17 From a structural point of
view, sulfonylaminooxazoline and -thiazoline ligands 6-16
are most closely related to the chiral (2-sulfonylamino)-
phenyloxazolines reported by Fujisawa18 and Mikami19 that
have been employed for enantioselective Diels-Alder,
cyclopropanation, and C-H bond activation reactions.
However, the latter ligands have not yet been explored for
asymmetric zinc additions and do not offer the same level
of control in scaffold configurations, metal complex bite
angles, and substitution patterns as ligands 6-16.
For comparison, we also tested the cis-aminooxazolines
14-16, even though molecular modeling predicted that the
geometry for bidentate metal chelation between the sulfon-
amide and oxazoline nitrogens was not as favorable as in
the trans-configured congeners. Indeed, the % ee values
under a variety of reaction conditions did not exceed 51%,
and now (S)-17 was the predominantly formed enantiomer
(Table 1, entries 12-16). This change in enantiofacial
selectivity in the diethyl zinc addition clearly illustrates the
importance of the cyclohexane C(2)-stereocenter but might
also be the consequence of a monodentate interaction of
chiral ligands 14-16 with zinc. In terms of overall yield
and enantioselectivity, the trans-oxazoline mesylate 6 pro-
vided the best results (entry 1), and since the corresponding
thiazoline 7 was not superior but required three additional
synthetic steps, we decided to further investigate the scope
of this process by focusing on ligand 6.
The facial selectivity of the ligand 6/diethyl zinc reagent
can be explained by coordination of the aldehyde substrate
syn to the oxazoline isopropyl group of a distorted tetrahedral
zinc complex (Figure 3). This leaves the re-face of the
Substitution at the phenyl ring of the aromatic aldehydes
decreased the reaction rate and also led to small decreases
in the enantioselectivity of the ethylzinc addition process
(Table 2, entries 1 and 2). Cinnamaldehyde only provided a
Table 2. Asymmetric Et2Zn Addition to Aldehydes at 0 ˚C in
the Presence of 2 mol % of Chiral Ligand 6. In All Cases, the
(R)-Configuration at the Secondary Alcohol Carbon Was
Obtained as the Major Enantiomer
entry
substrate
time
yield (ee)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
(p-Cl)PhCHO
52 h
43 h
45 h
21 h
23 h
25 h
26 h
28 h
23 h
79% (72%)
81% (80%)
47% (41%)
91% (11%)
97% (83%)
68% (>98%)b
80% (91%)c
80% (94%)c
95% (92%)d
(p-MeO)PhCHO
(E)-PhHCdCHCHO
BnO(CH2)2CtCCHO
PhCH2CH2CHO
c-C6H11CHO
(L)-citronellal
(R)-citronellal
n-C7H15CHO
a Determined by chiral HPLC (Chiracell OD) unless noted otherwise.
b Determined by chiral GC. c de determined by GC analysis. d Determined
by comparison of rotation values with literature data.15
47% yield of addition product in 41% ee after 45 h at 0 °C
(entry 3). While, in general, low reaction rates were
associated with a low enantiomeric excess of the secondary
alcohol products, this did not apply to all substrates.
5-Benzyloxypent-2-ynal reacted rapidly, but with no signifi-
cant enantiofacial differentiation (entry 4). In contrast,
aliphatic aldehydes provided the highest enantioselectivities.
Hydrocinnamaldehyde led to 83% ee, and the secondary
alcohol products from cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde and oc-
tanal were formed in >98% and 92% ee, respectively (entries
6 and 9). From the enantiomeric (L)- and (R)-citronellal, two
diastereomeric addition products were formed in 91% and
94% de (entries 7 and 8), thus establishing predominant
reagent control over substrate diastereoselectivity in the
addition process.
Figure 3. Stereoview and CPK model of an acetaldehyde complex
with the methylzinc adduct to ligand 6. Complex geometry was
optimized semiempirically with PM3 parametrization using Spartan.
carbonyl group relatively open to nucleophilic attack, and
addition would accordingly occur opposite to the sulfonamide
(15) Ishizaki, M.; Fujita, K.; Shimamoto, M.; Hoshino, O. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1994, 5, 411.
(16) Bolm, C.; Muniz-Fernandez, K.; Seger, A.; Raabe, G.; Gu¨nther, K.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7860.
(17) Deng, W.-P.; Hou, X.-L.; Dai, L.-X. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999,
10, 4689.
(18) (a) Ichiyanagi, T.; Shimizu, M.; Fujisawa, T. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 7937. (b) Ichiyanagi, T.; Shimizu, M.; Fujisawa, T. Tetrahedron 1997,
53, 9599.
(19) Mikami, K.; Hatano, M.; Terada, M. Chem. Lett. 1999, 55.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 7, 2002
1199