discernible extent either.23 The requisites (sequence lengths,
nucleobases, type of activation and conditions) for a tran-
scription of TNA into RNA sequences remain to be explored.
Among the observed TNA ligations, relative efficiencies
qualitatively parallel the stability of complexes between
ligands, or between ligation products and templates. Thus,
the remarkably different response of the three templates
toward the single mismatch in the nonamer ligand reflects
itself in the Tm values of the corresponding ternary ligation
complexes (see caption of Figure 3). Expectedly, there are
exceptions, such as the observations according to which (A
f D) replacement in the TNA ligands accelerates ligations
whereas (A f D) replacement in the TNA template does
not (Table 2)24 or that DNA, as compared to RNA, seems
unproportionately inefficient as template relative to its cross-
pairing capability with TNA. A decisive factor for the
efficiency of intersystem template-controlled ligations must
be the constellational positioning of the two ligands’ reaction
districts by the template.16 Within the studies presented here,
this factor seems to express itself most prominently in the
observed asymmetry between the efficiency of RNA-
templated TNA ligation and that of TNA-templated RNA
ligations.
Figure 3. Effect of mismatches (M) in TNA 9-mer and 7-mer
ligands on the efficiency of phosphate-to-phosphodiester ligation
of TNA ligands (containing D and T) mediated by templates of
the TNA and RNA series. Tm values of ligation triplexes (phos-
phodiester series). L-9 + L-7 + template (5 + 5 + 5 µM): TNA-
(A,T), 22 °C; TNA(D,T), 37 °C. RNA(A,U): 32 °C. L-9(M) +
L-7 + template: TNA(A,T), <0 °C; TNA(D,T), <0 °C; RNA-
(A,U), 13 °C. For conditions of ligations, see caption of Table 2.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the
Skaggs Research Foundation. X.W. is a Skaggs Postdoctoral
Fellow. G.D. thanks the Skaggs Research foundation and la
Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico for fellowship
support.
Supporting Information Available: X-ray structure of
4, MALDI-TOF mass data of sequences, HPLC traces and
relative rate curves of selected ligations, and Tm values of
ligand-template, product-template, and ligand(mismatch)-
template complexes. This material is available free of charge
versions) in the 7-mer ligand. Expectedly, a single mismatch
in the 9-mer ligand turns out to be less harmful to the ligation
than one in the 7-mer ligand, the relative rates depending,
however, on the template. Offering both monomismatched
ligands concomitantly to any of the three templates does not
lead to ligation at all. This amounts to a remarkably high
sensitivity of the ligation to the presence of mismatches in
the TNA series.22
Under the conditions where the RNA template (containing
A and U) can direct the phosphate-to-phosphodiester ligation
of the TNA ligands even somewhat more efficiently than
the two TNA templates themselves (Figure 2 in the Sup-
porting Information), the latter do not induce the phosphate-
to-phosphodiester ligation of the RNA ligands r(AAAAU-
UUAU) and r-5′-phosphate-(AUUAUUA). To keep this
result in perspective, it must be pointed out that under
otherwise identical conditions the RNA template was found
not to induce ligation of the two RNA ligands to any
OL020016P
(17) N-(3-Dimethyl(aminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride ()
EDC); see, e.g., Shabarova, Z. A.; Dolinnaya, N. G.; Drusta, V. L.;
Melnikova, N. P.; Purmal, A. A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981, 9, 5747.
(18) Hartel, C.; Go¨bel, M. W. HelV Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 2541. Kozlov,
I.; Orgel, L. E. HelV. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 1799. See also the ligation
experiments in the p-RNA series: Bolli, M.; Micura, R.; Eschenmoser, A.
Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 309.
(19) Dolinnaya, N. G.; Sokolava, N. I., Grayznova, O. I.; Shabarova, Z.
A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 9, 3721. Lohrmann, R.; Orgel, L. E. Nature
1976, 261, 342. Zielinski, W. S.; Orgel, L. E. Nature 1987, 327, 346.
Kiedrowsky, G. v.; Wlotzka, B.; Helbing, J.; Matzen, M.; Jordan, S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 423.
(20) Schmidt, J. G.; Nielsen, P. E.; Orgel, L. E. Nucl. Acids Res. 1997,
25, 4797 and literature cited therein. Kozlov, I. A.; De Bouevere, B.;
Aerschot, A. v.; Herdewijn, P.; Orgel, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
5856. Kozlov, I. A.; Zelinski, M.; Allart, B.; Kerremans, L.; Aerschot, A.
v.; Busson, R.; Herdewijn, P.; Orgel, L. E. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 151.
Koppitz, M.; Nielsen, P. E.; Orgel, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
4563.
(13) Model considerations point to poor interstrand base stacking in the
(weakly base pairing) homopurine-homopyrimidine duplexes of TNA as
opposed to the (much more stable) duplexes in which purines and
pyrimidines are alternating (compare the low hyperchromicity in t(A12)/
t(T12) and its D-analogue in Figure 1, as compared to a hyperchromicity of
35-40% for TNA duplexes (AT)8, (AU)8, or (TA)8).
(14) Stability rise increments are expected to depend on sequences and
are not expected to remain the same with increasing the number of (A f
D) replacements. See: Sa´gi, J.; Szakanyi, E.; Vorl´ıckova´, M.; Kypr, J. J.
Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1996, 13, 1035.
(21) Slow ligation rates allow side reactions (due to large excess of the
carbodiimide activation agent) to hamper product formation.
(22) For recent studies on the fidelity of template-controlled ligations
see, for examle, Kenneth, J.; Ellington, A. D. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 595.
Bolli, M.; Micura, R.; Pitsch, S.; Eschenmoser, A. HelV. Chim. Acta 1997,
80, 1901. Mattes, A.; Seitz, O. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2050.
(23) For the inefficiency of chemical ligation of RNA ligands on DNA
templates, see the following: Dolinnaya, N. G.; Sokolova, N. I.; Ashir-
bekova, D. T.; Shabarova, Z. A. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 3067.
(24) Self-pairing of template strands are expected to contribute to this
phenomenon. Tm values (c ≈ 5 µM, 1 M NaCl) of template strands: TNA-
(A,T), <5 °C; TNA(D,T), 30 °C.
(15) Naylor, R.; Gilham, P. T. Biochemistry 1966, 5, 2722.
(16) Dolinnaya, N. G.; Shabarova, Z. A. Russ. Chem. Bull. 1996, 45,
1787 (review).
(25) Marky, L. A.; Breslauer, R. J. Biopolymers 1987, 26, 1601.
1286
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 8, 2002