Fig. 1 MALDI spectrum of 8.
In summary, we report here the preparation of the new
cryptophanols 4–6 containing a single hydroxy function. The
strategy described herein provides the basis for a general
method for preparing functionalized cryptophanes. These new
molecules are believed to be key compounds for the elaboration
of large supramolecular systems, as suggested by the synthesis
of compounds 7, 8 and 14. Monofunctionalized cryptophanes
provide an original tool for the optical resolution of new
diastereoisomeric derivatives via the reaction of molecules 4–6
with a chiral substrate.10 We now focus our work on the
synthesis of selectively multiprotected cryptophanes for the
design of new elaborate structures such as hosts of biological
relevant interest, water-soluble cryptophanes and xenon@cryp-
tophane complexes.
Scheme 1 Reagents and conditions: i, Cs2CO3, DMF, 80 °C, 18 h; ii,
CHCl3, HCO2H (50+50), 55 °C, 2 h 30 min; iii, Pd(OAc)2, PPh3, THF,
NHEt2, H2O, 4 h.
We thank J.-C. Mulatier for skilful experimental assistance.
These yields are however significantly lower than that obtained
with cryptophane-A under the same experimental conditions.2
The difficulties encountered in the preparation of these new
derivatives led us to the conclusion that new routes using milder
conditions should also be examined. For instance it has been
reported that scandium triflate promotes calixarene formation in
moderate yields under mild conditions leaving unreacted allyl
groups.9 In the light of these results, attempts were made to
reproduce these experiments with cryptophane precursors. The
results appeared promising as, for instance, reaction of 13 with
scandium triflate (0.6 equiv.) in acetonitrile gave 1 in 10% yield
after purification. Finally, removal of the allyl group was
achieved by the use of a palladium catalyst in the presence of
diethylamine and water to give the unprotected cryptophanes
4–6 in 80–85% yields.§ These new cryptophanes have been
isolated as their anti chiral isomer and are of large potential
interest in the design of new supramolecular hosts.
Notes and references
‡ Presented at the 6th International Conference on Calixarenes, May
29–June 2, 2001, Twente (NL).
§ The cryptophanes described herein were purified by column chromatog-
raphy on silica gel and recrystallized in a chloroform–ethanol mixture. All
new compounds were fully characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy
and by HRMS. The detailed synthesis of 4–8 and 14 will be presented in a
forthcoming full paper.
1 L. Garel, B. Lozach, J.-P. Dutasta and A. Collet, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1993, 115, 11652; L. Garel, J.-P. Dutasta and A. Collet, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1993, 32, 1169; A. Collet, in Comprehensive Supramo-
lecular Chemistry, Pergamon, New York, 1996, vol. 2, p. 325.
2 A. Collet, J.-P. Dutasta, B. Lozach and J. Canceill, Topics in Current
Chemistry, 1993, 165, 103; A. Collet, J.-P. Dutatsa and B. Lozach, Bull.
Soc. Chim. Belg., 1990, 99, 617.
3 K. Bartik, M. Luhmer, J.-P. Dutasta, A. Collet and J. Reisse, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 784.
Hosts 7 and 8 were designed for the study of the guest
exchange processes between cryptophanes and exemplify the
potentialities of cryptophanols 4–6. Compounds 7 and 8 are
similar except that one cryptophane in molecule 8 has been
replaced by its partially deuterated congener. Both compounds
have been obtained by a Williamson synthesis using caesium
carbonate as base and 1,10-diiododecane as alkylating agent.
Compound 7 was obtained in 30% yield in DMF from two
equivalents of 4 and one equivalent of 1,10-diiododecane. The
unsymmetrical molecule 8 required the synthesis of compound
14, which was obtained by treating 4 with an excess of
1,10-diiododecane. The reaction of 14 and cryptophanol 5 under
similar conditions, afforded compound 8.§ Bis-cryptophanes 7
4 C. Dybowski and N. Bansal, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 1991, 42, 433; P.
J. Barrie, J. Klinowski and D. Raftery, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson.
Spectros., 1992, 91; M. Luhmer, B. M. Goodson, Y. Q. Song, D. D.
Laws, L. Kaiser, M. C. Cyrier and A. Pines, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998,
120, 3502.
5 T. W. Greene and P. G. M. Wuts, Protective Groups in Organic
Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edn., 1991.
6 T. Brotin, M. Darzac, D. Forest, M. Becchi and J.-P. Dutasta, J. Mass
Spectrom., 2001, 36, 1092.
7 T. Brotin, A. Lesage, L. Emsley and A. Collet, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000,
122, 1171; T. Brotin, T. Devic, A. Lesage, L. Emsley and A. Collet,
Chem. Eur. J., 2001, 7, 1561.
8 J. Canceill, A. Collet and G. Gottarelli, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106,
5997.
and 8 have been isolated as a mixture of stereoisomers. 1H, 13
C
9 H. Konishi, H. Sakakibara, K. Kobayashi and O. Morikawa, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1999, 2583.
10 T. Brotin, M. Darzac, R. Barbe and J.-P. Dutasta, unpublished results.
NMR and MALDI mass spectrometry were used to ascertain the
structures of molecules 7 and 8 (Fig. 1).
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 48–49
49