Intramolecular Diels-Alder Reactions of R-Methylene Lactones
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 8, 2002 2477
Sch em e 5. Syn th esis of Su bstr a te 37
Sch em e 7. Retr osyn th etic An a lysis for Ta xol
Ba sed on a n In tr a m olecu la r Diels-Ald er Rea ction
With the presence of a hydroxy function in position 10,
we reasoned that the Taxol skeleton might be accessible
by an intramolecular Diels-Alder strategy using an
R-methylenelactone as dienophile.35-39 The corresponding
retrosynthetic analysis is shown in Scheme 7. The Taxol-
like structure A incorporates the R-butyrolactone.40 Dis-
connection according to a Diels-Alder reaction leads to
the R-methylene lactone B. Removal of both the dieno-
phile and dienyl group provides the cyclohexenal C as a
potential starting material.
This compound itself is easily available by an inter-
molecular Diels-Alder reaction41 (Scheme 8). A certain
problem is clearly the control of the relative stereochem-
istry at positions 2 and 10. This study would serve to
reveal the scope and limitation of this intramolecular
Diels-Alder strategy. The synthesis began with the
construction of the A-ring and attachment of a diene or
suitable precursor thereof, respectively. As described by
Dai et al., the cyclohexenal 43 could be obtained on a
large scale by the borontrifluoride etherate (BF3‚Et2O)-
catalyzed cycloaddition between the diene 4242 and
acrolein. To prevent decomposition, it is best to use the
cycloadduct 43 directly after chromatographic purifica-
tion. With the aldehyde function present, it seemed
appropriate to continue the synthesis with the attach-
ment of the dienyl part. Although a dienyl anion can be
generated by transmetalation of (E)-1,3-(1-tributylstan-
nyl)butadiene, this compound is difficult to obtain.43,44 We
Sch em e 6. Syn th esis of Su bstr a te 41 F ea tu r in g a
F u r a n a s Dien e
ration of the terminal double bond providing the alcohol
34 after oxidative workup. Oxidation of 34 with the
Dess-Martin periodinane led to the aldehyde 35 that was
extended with the allyl bromide 9 under Reformatsky
conditions to yield the hydroxy ester 36. Subsequent
lactonization of 36 under basic conditions furnished the
R-methylenelactone 37. In this case the two-step proce-
(35) Wender, P. A.; Badham, N. F.; Conway, S. P.; Floreancig, P.
E.; Glass, T. E.; Houze, J . B.; Krauss, N. E.; Lee, D.; Marquess, D. G.;
McGrane, P. L.; Meng, W.; Natchus, M. G.; Shuker, A. J .; Sutton, J .
C.; Taylor, R. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2757-2758.
(36) Morihira, K.; Hara, R.; Kawahara, S.; Nishimori, T.; Nakamura,
N.; Kusama, H.; Kuwajima, I. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12980-
12981.
dure for the establishment of the lactone moiety gave
better yields than the one-pot variant.
(37) Paquette, L. A.; Wang, H.-L.; Su, Z.; Zhao, M. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 5213-5225.
To probe the reactivity of the dienophile, we also
prepared the furan-containing substrate 41 (Scheme
6).33,34 This was accessible by Swern oxidation of 3-(2-
furyl)propanol (38). The aldehyde 39 was converted to
the 2-substituted acrylate 40 by the Reformatsky reaction
with the allylic bromide 9 in aqueous ammonium chlo-
ride. Lactonization to 41 was cleanly achieved by treat-
ment of the 4-hydroxy ester 40 with sodium hydride.
Compound 41 proved to be more stable toward polym-
erization than the other R-methylene lactones. The
diastereotopic protons in the lactone ring of 41 appear
as two ddd (δ ) 2.53, 3.03).
(38) Mukaiyama, T.; Shiina, I.; Iwadare, H.; Saitoh, M.; Nishimura,
T.; Ohkawa, N.; Sakoh, H.; Nishimura, K.; Tani, Y.-i.; Hasegawa, M.;
Yamada, K.; Saitoh, K. Chem. Eur. J . 1999, 5, 121-161.
(39) Intramolecular Diels-Alder approaches: (a) Sakan, K.; Craven,
B. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 3732-3734. (b) Shea, K. J .; Gilman,
J . W.; Haffner, C. D.; Dougherty, T. K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
4953-4956. (c) Brown, P. A.; J enkins, P. R. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1986, 1303-1309.
(40) Proposal for
a common pharmacophore: Giannakakou, P.;
Gussio, R.; Nogales, E.; Downing, K. H.; Zaharevitz, D.; Bollbuck, B.;
Poy, G.; Sackett, D.; Nicolaou, K. C.; Fojo, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 2000, 97, 2904-2909.
(41) Dai, W. M.; Lau, C. W.; Chung, S. H.; Wu, Y. D. J . Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 8128-8129.
(42) Nicolaou, K. C.; Liu, J .-J .; Yang, Z.; Ueno, H.; Sorensen, E. J .;
Claiborne, C. F.; Guy, R. K.; Hwang, C.-K.; Nakada, M.; Nantermet,
P. G. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 634-644.
(43) Wender, P. A.; Sieburth, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22,
2471-2474.
(33) Grootaert, W. M.; De Clercq, P. J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27,
1731-1734.
(34) J ung, M. E.; Gervay, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5469-
(44) Angoh, A. G.; Clive, D. L. J . J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1984, 534.
5470.