L. Politanskaya, E. Malykhin, V. Shteingarts
FULL PAPER
increase in nucleophile reactivity makes the TS more react- in distinctly protic, particularly hydroxylic, solvents on the
ant-like, so that the charge density distribution in 1 would other.[5Ϫ8] Specifically, as a result of conferring charged nu-
be an increasingly significant factor in the difference be- cleophiles with considerably higher activity, TSs are ex-
tween the activation parameters for ortho- and para-arylox- pected to be generally more reactant-like in solvents of the
ydefluorination, thus enhancing the enthalpic preference for first type than in solvents of the second. As a consequence,
ortho substitution. The change of ∆∆H϶ from Ϫ0.9 to any decrease in nucleophile activity due to structural
o/p
Ϫ2.1 kJ/mol on going from X ϭ p-F to X ϭ p-OMe is reasons may change the correlation of activation para-
in line with this prediction. Conversely, the increase in the meters of competing reactions and regioselectivity, in com-
electron-accepting capability of a substituent in the phenox- pliance with the strengthening intermediate-like character
ide is expected to diminish the enthalpic advantage of ortho of the TS.
substitution, even as far as reversing the o/p ratio, as indeed
occurs, for example, on going from sodium methoxide to
Experimental Section
sodium phenoxide in their respective reactions with o- and
p-fluoronitrobenzenes in methyl alcohol (∆∆H϶ ϭ Ϫ0.5
General Methods and Materials: The 19F NMR spectra were re-
corded with a Bruker WP-200 SY instrument in 50% Et2O and 5%
[D6]acetone solutions, using C6F6 as an internal standard. The H
o/p
kcal/mol for MeOϪ and ϩ3.3 kcal/mol for PhOϪ).[5]
It is known[29] that p-alkylphenoxides display a variation
1
of gas phase acidity in the order Me Ͻ Et Ͻ iPr Ͻ H Ͻ
tBu,[29] thus illustrating the weakening of the electron-do-
nating influence of the alkyl substituent and its trend to-
wards a change to an electron-withdrawing one with the
branching at the alkyl α-carbon atom; i.e. the increase in
the alkyl polarizability is unfavorable for phenoxide basi-
city. Accordingly, if one assumes for the above reasons that
alkylphenoxide nucleophilicity in liquid ammonia should
follow the same sequence, the inversion of ∆∆H϶o/p, con-
comitant with passing from p-Me and p-Et to p-iPr and p-
tBu (Table 7), would suggest the growth of the interme-
diate-like character of TS, to the detriment of its reactant-
like character, as caused by weakening phenoxide nucleo-
NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker WP-200 SY instrument
in 5% [D6]acetone and CD2Cl2 solutions, using [(CH3)3Si]2O as an
internal standard. Ϫ IR spectra were recorded with a UR-20 instru-
ment in KBr tablets (0.25% by weight). Ϫ Exact values of molecu-
lar ion masses were measured by high-resolution mass spectrometry
with a Finnigan MAT-8200 machine. 2,4-Difluoronitrobenzene (1)
was prepared according to the literature procedure.[30] Phenol, m-
cresol, p-cresol, p-ethylphenol, p-fluorophenol, p-methoxyphenol,
p-isopropylphenol, and p-tert-butylphenol were commercially avail-
able. Liquid ammonia was purified by dissolving metallic sodium
in it, with subsequent distillation into the reaction flask at Ϫ40 °C.
Metallic lithium and potassium were purified from their oxide films
and weighed directly before loading into the reaction flask.
General Procedure for the Preparation of Lithium Phenoxides in Li-
quid Ammonia: To liquid ammonia (75 mL) at Ϫ40 °C was added
lithium metal (0.02 g), with stirring. FeCl3·6H2O (ca. 0.005 g) was
added to the obtained dark blue solution, which was stirred until
lithium amide formation was complete, concomitant with decolor-
ization. To generate the lithium phenoxide, one equivalent (relative
to lithium amide) of phenol was added (concentration 0.04 mol/l).
philicity. Such a view is consistent with the ∆∆H϶ values
o/p
for the reactions of 1 with PhOLi and p-FC6H4OLi (ca.
Ϫ0.9 kJ/mol), p-iPrC6H4OLi (ϩ1.7 kJ/mol), and p-tBu-
C6H4OLi (ϩ2.7 kJ/mol). Thus, the p-iPr and p-tBu sub-
stituents manifest as electron-withdrawing ones, dimin-
ishing phenoxide nucleophilicity in the reaction in question:
this is similar to their influence on the phenol dissociation
equilibrium in the gas phase. If so, for the reactions between
1 and 2aϪf, the o/p ratios are apparently determined by
factors inherent in the ‘‘early’’ TS, first of all by the charge
density distribution in 1, which is characterized by the
greater proportion of positive charge in the position ortho
to the nitro group, as compared to the para position. De-
creasing nucleophilicity on passing to 2g and 2h makes the
TS more closely similar to the intermediate σ-complexes,
and heightens the influence of those factors inherent in the
‘‘late’’ TS. It is suggested that this is the reason for the in-
version of the correlation of TS energies in favor of para
substitution.
General Procedure for the Interaction of 2,4-Difluoronitrobenzene
(1) with Lithium Phenoxide in Liquid Ammonia: To a thermostatted
(Ϯ0.5 °C) solution of lithium phenoxide, prepared as described
above, was added 1 (1 g). It was stirred for 10 and 20 min for X ϭ
p-OMe, m-Me, p-Me, and p-Et; and for 20 and 30 min for X ϭ p-F,
H, p-iPr, and p-tBu, at Ϫ33 and Ϫ55 °C, respectively. To determine
temperature dependencies, not less than 6 experiments were carried
out for each compound at fixed temperatures (error Ϯ0.5 °C), with
a step of ca. 5 °C. The reaction mixture was poured into a stirred
suspension of ammonium chloride (ca. 2 g) in diethyl ether
(100 mL) cooled to Ϫ50 °C. After the ammonia had evaporated,
the mixture was diluted with water (50 mL) and extracted with di-
ethyl ether (2 ϫ 50 mL). The combined ether extracts were washed
with 5% aqueous NaOH solution (2 ϫ 50 mL), then with water
(50 mL), and dried with MgSO4. The mixture of reaction products
obtained after solvent evaporation (1.1Ϫ1.2 g for X ϭ H, p-F, m-
Me, p-Me; and 1.2Ϫ1.3 g for X ϭ p-OMe, p-Et, p-iPr, p-tBu), was
analyzed by 19F NMR.
Conclusion
The results given in this paper, together with other General Procedure for the Separation of 3 and 4 from other Reaction
data,[3,15,17] are believed to explain the significant difference
in the detailed mechanisms of fluorine nucleophilic substi-
tution in positions ortho and para to the nitro group by the
Products: A mixture of 1, 3, and 4 was purified by column chroma-
tography (silica gel 40Ϫ140 µ, hexane), followed by evaporation of
1 in vacuum (5 Torr with 70 °C bath), to give a mixture of 3 and 4.
action of anionic nucleophiles in liquid ammonia, as well
as, probably, in aprotic bipolar solvents on one hand, and Potassium Hydroxide in Liquid Ammonia: To a stirred solution of
General Procedure for the Interaction of a Mixture of 3 and 4 with
410
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 405Ϫ411