708
S. Colarusso et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 705–708
Table 3. P2 and P3 SAR of tripeptide ketoacids
To optimize the hydrophobic interactions in the S3 site,
a variety of natural and non-natural hydrophobic
amino acids were screened. Cyclopentylglycine emerged
as the optimal substituent in this position (30, IC50 0.38
mM), being nearly equipotent to the glutamic acid con-
taining compound 24.
No.
X
P3
P2
IC50 (mM)
In summary, we have described the evolution of tripep-
tide ketoacid inhibitors from a polyanionic hexapeptide,
showing that the P5 and P6 acids are not needed for
activity. Also the P4 residue could be eliminated,
although the capping group fulfills part of the role of
this group. The structural data collected helped in
understanding the observed SAR. We believe that these
results may provide a basis for the difficult task of find-
ing more potent and less peptidic inhibitors of NS3/
NS4A protease.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Cbz
Cbz
Cbz
Cbz
Cbz
Boc
Boc
Boc
Boc
Boc
Boc
Boc
Ile
Ile
Ile
Ile
Gly
Ala
Abu
Phe
>100
15.6
3.28
9.4
Ile
Val
16.0
0.30
0.33
0.46
2.10
1.63
8.90
0.38
Glu
Glu
Val
Gln
Asp
Ala
DifluoroAbu
Leu
Leu
Leu
Leu
Leu
Leu
c-Pentylgly
becomes clear that activity is related to the hydro-
phobicity of the side chain. Alkyl is preferred over
phenyl (cf., 7 to 22, IC50 9.4 mM), and b-branched
hydrophobic amino acids such as Val (23, IC50 16 mM)
are excluded by the architecture of this site. These
observations are consistent with earlier SAR in the
product inhibitor hexapeptide series.12
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mirko Brunetti, Mauro Cerretani,
Sergio Serafini, Sergio Altamura and Christian Stein-
kuhler for providing the assay data, the analytical
chemistry department for assistance, and Janet Clench
and Michael Rowley for valuable discussions.
Recalling that the NS5A/5B substrate for NS3 has
cysteine in P1 and P2, substitution with our cysteine
mimetic was also tried in this position. Inhibitor 24
proved to be equipotent to 25. The difluoromethyl
group probably acts here as a purely hydrophobic
group, although electrostatic components may have a
role in binding.13,14
References and Notes
1. Narjes, F.; Koehler, K. F.; Koch, U.; Gerlach, B.;
Colarusso, S.; Steinkuhler, C.; Brunetti, M.; Altamura, S.;
De Francesco, R.; Matassa, V. G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2002, 12, 701.
2. Kolykhalov, A. A.; Mihalik, K.; Feinstone, S. M.; Rice,
C. M. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 2046.
In the crystal structure (Fig. 1), the lipophilic P2 group
covers the catalytic ion pair His57-Asp81, thus stabiliz-
ing it in two ways: (1) by reducing its conformational
flexibility, and (2) by shielding it from solvent. We pre-
sume that this may influence active site binding through
subtle changes in the pKa of the amino acids involved.15
3. Perni, R. B. Drug News Perspect. 2000, 13, 69.
4. Narjes, F.; Brunetti, M.; Colarusso, S.; Gerlach, B.; Koch,
U.; Biasiol, G.; Fattori, D.; De Francesco, R.; Matassa, V. G.;
Steinkuhler, C. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 1849.
5. Di Marco, S.; Rizzi, M.; Volpari, C.; Walsh, M. A.; Narjes,
F.; Colarusso, S.; De Francesco, R.; Matassa, V. G.; Sollazzo,
M. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 7152.
6. Wasserman, H. H.; Ho, W.-B. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4364.
7. Ghosh, A. K.; Duong, T. T.; McKee, S. P.; Thompson, W.
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 2781.
8. Podlech, J.; Seebach, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995,
34, 471.
9. Satoh, Y.; Marcopolus, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1759.
10. Urbani, A.; Bianchi, E.; Narjes, F.; Tramontano, A.; De
Francesco, R.; Steinkuhler, C.; Pessi, A. J. Biol. Chem. 1997,
272, 9204.
11. Koch, U.; Biasiol, G.; Brunetti, M.; Fattori, D.; Pallaoro,
M.; Steinkuhler, C. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 631.
12. Ingallinella, P.; Altamura, S.; Bianchi, E.; Taliani, M.;
Ingenito, R.; Cortese, R.; Francesco, R. D.; Steinkuehler, C.;
Pessi, A. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 8906.
Both hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups are accepted
in P3. Replacing isoleucine in 8 with valine or glutamic
acid, both found in substrates of NS3, increased
potency (Table 3). The interactions in the S3 site were
quite specific. Converting glutamic acid into glutamine
as in 27 or aspartic acid as in 28 resulted in a 6- or 10-
fold decrease in potency, respectively. Likewise, repla-
cement of Val with Ala gave a much weaker compound
(29, IC50 8.9 mM).
Modeling studies, confirmed by the X-ray structure,
showed that the lipophilic groups interact with Cys159
and Val132, and the carboxylate groups can have elec-
trostatic interactions with Lys136 (Fig. 1). The longer
side-chain of Glu versus Asp allows the carboxylate to
be in close vicinity to Lys136 and the extra methylene
augments the hydrophobic contact.
13. Dunitz, J. D.; Taylor, R. Chem. Eur. J. 1997, 3, 89.
14. Erickson, J. A.; McLoughlin, J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1626.
15. Barbato, G.; Cicero, D. O.; Cordier, F.; Narjes, F.; Ger-
lach, B.; Sambucini, S.; Grzesiek, S.; Matassa, V. G.; De
Francesco, R.; Bazzo, R. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 1195.