solution was extracted with chloroform, the organic phase was dried over
The interest of the method lies in the use of a bisaminal
moiety both as an organic template and as a protecting group for
selective functionalisation. Indeed, the rigidity of the bisaminal
type tricyclic adduct 1 enables the cyclisation key step to occur
in very good yields without any high dilution conditions. The
formation of 1 as the unique product of the condensation of the
tetraamine with pyruvic aldehyde is consistent with the results
reported with glyoxal or butanedione which have already been
used as dicarbonyl compounds for the synthesis of cyclen,
cyclam and 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclotridecane after removal of the
bisaminal group.7 Indeed, the formation of three six-membered
fused rings is favoured, as well as the cis configuration of the
bisaminal bridge. Yet, there are still two possible isomers in the
case of pyruvic aldehyde, depending on the relative position of
the hydrogen atom and the methyl group on the bisaminal
moiety. As evidenced by the crystallographic structure, only the
isomer in which the methyl group is connected to the aminal-
type carbon atom between the two secondary amines is
obtained. The X-ray structure of 3b shows that the quaterniza-
tion of the bisaminal protected macrocycle occurs selectively on
the nitrogen atom linked to the aminal carbon bearing the
methyl group. In fact, the steric repulsions between the methyl
and the benzyl groups are minimized in this case as shown by a
simple model examination. This feature is responsible for the
exceptional selectivity of our method since trans di-N-
quaternization of 2b does not occur, unlike the results reported
with other aminal type macrocyclic compounds.6,8,9 For similar
reasons, attempts to quaternize the butanedione protected
cyclam failed, due to the presence of two methyl groups on the
bisaminal bridge which hinder the two nitrogen atoms available
for quaternization. When using glyoxal instead of butanedione,
it is known that two isomers are obtained, depending on whether
the glyoxal is condensed with cyclam or with the linear
tetraamine prior to the cyclisation.9,10 In the latter case,
although quaternization of the glyoxal protected cyclam occurs
in good yield, the bisaminal bridge cannot easily be removed in
the ultimate step. Conversely, the bisaminal bridge in 3a and 3b
can be readily removed in mild conditions to release the
monobenzylated macrocycles, owing mainly to the large
distance between the ammonium nitrogen atom and the aminal-
type carbon atom.
MgSO4 and evaporated to give the compound 4a as a colorless oil. dH 1.56
(m, 2H), 2.20 (bs, 3H), 2.46–2.69 (m, 16H), 3.50 (s, 2H), 7.16 (m, 5H), dC
28.9; 47.2; 47.9; 48.4 (2C); 49.4; 50.7; 54.3; 54.4; 60.4; 127.3; 128.5; 129.4;
139.7. [M+] 276.7.
X-Ray suitable crystals of 1 and 3b were grown from chloroform. In both
cases the structure was solved using direct methods11 and refined by full
matrix least-squares on F2.12 H-Atoms were observed in the Fourier
synthesis and refined with a global isotropic thermal factor in each
structure.
Crystal data for C10H20N4 (1): M = 196.30, monoclinic, a = 9.3721(4),
b = 7.8942(4), c = 14.4579(7) Å, b = 91.1640(2) Å, U = 1069.23(9) Å3,
T = 110(2) K, space group P21/n, Z = 4, m(Mo-Ka) = 0.077 mm21, 4135
reflections measured, 2448 unique (Rint = 0.0303) which were used in all
calculations. The final wR(F2) was 0.1043 (all data). CCDC 172982.
Crystal data for C23H34BrCl9N4 for (3b): M = 765.50, monoclinic, a =
10.4280(2), b = 28.2670(7), c = 11.6960(4) Å, b = 110.544(1) Å, U =
3228.35(15) Å3, T = 110(2) K, space group P21/n, Z = 4, m(Mo-Ka) =
2.040 mm21, 12777 reflections measured, 7271 unique (Rint = 0.0999)
which were used in all calculations. The final wR(F2) was 0.0958 (all data).
tallographic files in .cif or other format.
1 See for example: M. Meyer, V. Dahaoui-Gindrey, C. Lecomte and R.
Guilard, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1998, 180, 1313; K. P. Wainwright, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 1997, 166, 35; R. M. Izatt, K. Pawlak, J. S. Bradshaw and
R. L. Bruening, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 2529.
2 S. Liu and D. S. Edwards, Bioconjugate Chem., 2001, 7.
3 F. Denat, S. Brandès and R. Guilard, Synlett, 2000, 561.
4 S. Brandès, C. Gros, F. Denat, P. Pullumbi and R. Guilard, Bull. Soc.
Chim. Fr., 1996, 133, 65.
5 G. J. Bridger, R. T. Skerlj, D. Thornton, S. Padmanabhan, S. A.
Martellucci, G. W. Henson, M. J. Abrams, N. Yamamoto, K. De Vreese,
R. Pauwels and E. De Clercq, J. Med. Chem., 1995, 38, 366; J. I.
Luengo, A. T. Price, A. Shaw and K. Wiggall, World Pat., WO
00/66112, 2000.
6 E. H. Wong, G. R. Weisman, D. C. Hill, D. P. Reed, M. E. Rogers, J. S.
Condon, M. A. Fagan, J. C. Calabrese, K. C. Lam, I. A. Guzei and A. L.
Rheingold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 10561; T. J. Hubin, J. M.
McCormick, N. W. Alcock, H. J. Clase and D. H. Busch, Inorg. Chem.,
1999, 38, 4435.
7 G. Hervé, H. Bernard, N. Le Bris, J. J. Yaouanc and H. Handel,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 6861; J. Platzek, K. Hoyer, K.-D. Graske
and B. Radüchel, World Pat., WO 00/32581, 2000; G. Ripa and M.
Argese, World Pat., WO 98/49151, 1998; R. W. Sandnes, J. Vasilevskis,
K. Undheim and M. Gacek, World Pat., WO 96/28432, 1996; R. W.
Sandnes, M. Gacek and K. Undheim, Acta Chem. Scand., 1998, 52,
1402; G. Hervé, H. Bernard, N. Le Bris, M. Le Baccon, J. J. Yaouanc
and H. Handel, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 2517; M. Ferrari, G. B.
Giovenzana, G. Palmisano and M. Sisti, Synth. Commun., 2000, 30, 15;
M. Argese, G. Ripa, A. Scala and V. Valle, World Pat., WO 97/49691,
1997; G. Herve, N. Le Bris, H. Bernard, J. J. Yaouanc, H. Des Abbayes
and H. Handel, J. Organomet. Chem., 1999, 585, 259; R. A. Kolinski
and F. G. Riddell, Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, 22, 2217; B. Fuchs and A.
Ellencweig, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 1979, 98, 326; J. Jazwinski
and R. A. Kolinski, Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, 22, 1711.
8 G. Royal, V. Dahaoui-Gindrey, S. Dahaoui, A. Tabard, R. Guilard, P.
Pullumbi and C. Lecomte, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1998, 1971; C. Bucher,
G. Royal, J.-M. Barbe and R. Guilard, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40,
2315; C. Bucher, E. Duval, J. M. Barbe, J. N. Verpeaux, C. Amatore and
R. Guilard, C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. IIc: Chim., 2000, 3, 211; S. Rojas-
Lima, N. Farfan, R. Santillan, D. Castillo, M. E. Sosa-Torres and H.
Hopfl, Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 6427; G. R. Weisman, M. E. Rogers, E.
W. Wong, J. P. Jasinski and E. S. Paight, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112,
8604; G. R. Weisman, E. H. Wong, D. C. Hill, M. E. Rogers, D. P. Reed
and J. C. Calabrese, Chem. Commun., 1996, 947; J. Rohovec, R.
Gyepes, I. Cisarova, J. Rudovsky and I. Lukes, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000,
41, 1249.
The method reported here represents a very powerful route
from a linear tetraamine towards monobenzylated cyclam and
1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclotridecane, and indirectly to BFCs based
on these macrocycles. In contrast to glyoxal or butanedione,
pyruvic aldehyde allows the selective mono-N-functionalisa-
tion of the protected macrocycle before removal of the
bisaminal bridge. In order to obtain various mono-N-function-
alised tetraazacycloalkanes, we are currently extending the
scope of this method to the cyclen series and to different
quaternizing agents. For example, methyl iodide or ethyl
iodoacetate have been successfully employed. Biselectrophilic
reagents such as a,a’-dibromo-p-xylene can also be used, thus
providing a much better alternative synthesis of highly potent
antiviral bisazamacrocycles when compared to the existing
ones.
Notes and references
† Typical experimental procedure: synthesis of 4-benzyl-1,4,7,10-tetra-
azacyclotridecane 4a. To a solution of N,NA-bis(2-aminoethyl)-1,3-propane-
diamine (1.22 g; 7.65 mmol) in 50 ml of acetonitrile cooled to 4 °C was
added dropwise a solution of pyruvic aldehyde (40 wt% solution in water;
1.38 g; 7.65 mmol). After completion of the reaction (4 h) the solution was
heated under reflux, potassium carbonate (5.28 g; 38.25 mmol) and
1,2-dibromoethane (1.43 g; 7.65 mmol) were added. After 48 h, the mixture
was filtered, the filtrate was evaporated and the residue was chromato-
graphed over an alumina plug using dichloromethane as eluent to give 2a as
a colorless oil (1.17 g; 5.27 mmol; yield 69%). A mixture of 2a and benzyl
bromide (0.90 g; 5.27 mmol) in 10 ml of acetonitrile was stirred at rt for 24
h, the white precipitate formed was filtered off and washed with diethyl
ether and salt 3a was obtained as a white powder (1.10 g; 2.80 mmol; yield
53%). The solid was dissolved in 10 ml of water, 100 ml of 3M aqueous
NaOH solution was added and the mixture was refluxed for 12 h. The
9 J. Kotek, P. Hermann, P. Vojtisek, J. Rohovec and I. Lukes, Collect.
Czech. Chem. Commun., 2000, 65, 243.
10 R. A. Kolinski, Polish J. Chem., 1995, 69, 1039.
11 SIR97 program, A. Altomare, M. C. Burla, M. Camalli, G. L.
Cascarano, C. Giacovazzo, A. Guagliardi, A. G. G. Moliterni, G.
Polidori and R. Spagna, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1999, 32, 115.
12 SHELXL97 program, G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL97, Program for the
Refinement of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Göttingen,
Germany, 1997.
13 ORTEP-3 for Windows, L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1997, 30,
565.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 312–313
313