Figure 2. (a) Arginine ester recognition with 2; note the extended
side chain. (b) Histidine ester recognition with 3; note the perfect
structural complementarity. Monte Carlo simulations have been
carried out in water (MacroModel 7.0, Amber*).
Monte Carlo simulations in water reach complex geom-
etries with an intriguing complementarity between host and
guest for the best binding partners described above.11 The
long trisphosphonate allows the arginine side chain to adopt
a thermodynamically favorable extended conformation and
still ensures a second electrostatic interaction with the
R-ammonium group (Figure 2a). By contrast, the compact
Figure 1. Basic m-xylylene recognition motif 1 for arginine in a
peptidic environment, optimized structure 2 with an additional
phosphonate arm, and carboxylate analogue 3.
in CD3OD).9 No binding, however, could be observed in
water.
In recent experiments, we titrated the most basic amino
acid esters as dicationic species with our new arginine
binders.10 Here we found that the new trisphosphonate
receptor molecule 2 displayed a pronounced arginine selec-
tivity, while a shorter carboxylate analogue turned out to be
moderately selective for histidine. Thus, arginine methyl ester
(36000 M-1 in CD3OD) was bound 18 times better than
histidine methyl ester and even 36 times better than lysine
methyl ester (Table 1). In D2O 2 can still bind the arginine
Figure 3. Schematic of the rational RGD receptor design.
Recognition of the RGD sequence is achieved by a combination
of an arginine host with an aspartate host interconnected by a rigid
optimized spacer, which prevents self-association.
Table 1. Binding Constants Resulting from NMR Titration
Experiments between Basic Amino Acid Esters and Optimized
m-Xylylene Receptor Structures 2 and 3 in Methanol and Water
at 25 °C
carboxylate can accommodate histidine’s imidazolium ring
just above its central benzene ring and still form an additional
salt bridge between its carboxylate anion and histidine’s
R-ammonium group, which is in close proximity to its side
chain (Figure 2b).
amino acid methyl
ester x 2 HCl
2 in CD3OD
2 in D2O
3 in D2O
arginine
histidine
lysine
36000 ( 51%a 800 ( 43%b
2400 ( 55%
1000 ( 22%
300 ( 20%
no saturation 500 ( 29%
no shifts no shifts
Its high arginine selectivity makes 2 an ideal candidate
for a potential RGD receptor. Since lysine is not bound at
all in water, we envisaged that an additional ammonium
group attached to the skeleton of 2 at the correct distance
via a rigid spacer could serve as the aspartate binding site.
The spacer should prevent intramolecular dimerization, while
the ammonium functionality is a bad guest for the trisphos-
phonate and should thus circumvent the unwanted inter-
molecular dimerization. Extensive modeling studies sug-
gested the introduction of a m-aminobenzyl substituent at
the amide nitrogen. This would also avoid the creation of a
stereogenic center that would arise from attachment of this
substituent at phosphonoglycine‘s methylene group.
Mild deprotonation of the amide in dipolar aprotic solution,
followed by addition of the phthaloylprotected spacer as a
a Errors are standard deviations from the nonlinear regressions. b The
large standard deviation in this case can be explained with small chemical
shift differences.
ester (800 M-1), but no saturation was found for the histidine
derivative and no shifts at all for the lysine ester. Interest-
ingly, the carboxylate 3 prefers histidine esters (500 M-1)
over arginine esters (300 M-1) at the same conditions but
cannot bind lysine esters.
(9) Rensing, S.; Springer, A.; Grawe, T.; Schrader, T. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 5814. Other powerful arginine receptors: (a) Bell, T. W.;
Khasanov, A. B.; Drew, M. G. B.; Filikov, A.; James, T. L. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2543. (b) Ngola, S. M.; Kearney, P. C.; Mecozzi, S.;
Russell, K.; Dougherty, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1192.
(10) (a) Schneider, H. J.; Kramer, R.; Simova, S.; Schneider, U. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 6442. (b) Wilcox, C. S. In Frontiers in Supra-
molecular Chemistry; Schneider, H. J., Ed.; Verlag Chemie: Weinheim,
1991; p 123.
(11) MacroModel 7.0, Schro¨dinger Inc., force-field: Amber*, 1000 steps,
water.
2162
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 13, 2002