demonstrating that neoglycopolymers can cluster proteins in
solution and in the cell.2,31 Compounds with more complex
binding epitopes32 may more effectively interact with
multiple copies of cell-surface L-selectin.
Our previous studies indicate that multivalent but not
monovalent ligands induce L-selectin shedding from white
blood cells.24 One explanation for this difference is that
polymeric ligands cluster multiple copies of L-selectin but
monovalent ligands do not. Because the ligands used in these
studies induce L-selectin downregulation,24 our results sug-
gest that the ability of these ligands to modulate cell-surface
levels of L-selectin depends on clustering.33 This finding
offers new opportunities for the design of L-selectin antago-
nists.34 Our results also suggest mechanisms by which natural
multivalent ligands may bind L-selectin.
In conclusion, end-labeled polymers are valuable probes
of multivalent ligand-receptor interactions. Our data reveal
that multivalent ligands varying in length with single end-
labels can be generated using ROMP. The investigations
described here highlight the utility of such materials for
probing the mechanisms underlying multivalent binding at
the cell surface. The ligands we have generated provide the
means to investigate mechanistic aspects of cell-surface
receptor-ligand interactions that have been inaccessible. We
anticipate that the strategies outlined can be used to
synthesize polymers that will be useful in a wide range of
materials science and in vitro and in vivo biological
applications.
Figure 3. (A) Treatment of Jurkat cells with (i) fluorophore-labeled
anti-L-selectin antibody, (ii) polymer 19a, (iii) 19b, or (iv) 19c.
(B) Results from the L-selectin binding assay. The binding of 19a-c
is reversed upon addition of unlabeled 3,6-disulfogalactose or sialyl
Lewis x-bearing polymers (data not shown). Concentrations refer
to 3,6-disulfogalactose residue concentration. The approximate
stoichiometry is defined as the number of copies of L-selectin that
interact simultaneously with a polymer of a given DP.28
toscreen for ligand binding. As anticipated,16 fluorescence
microscopy experiments indicate that 19a-c interact with
Jurkat cells displaying L-selectin. To quantify the amount
of bound ligand, Jurkat cells were treated with 19a-c and
washed, and the intensity of the fluorescence emission was
assessed (Figure 3B). The resulting data were fit to the
equation in Figure 1d to determine the dissociation constant
(Kd) for each compound.28 The Kd values for the polymers29
were dependent on the polymer length. Polymer 19c (degree
of polymerization,30 DP of 150) had a potency that was ca.
10-fold greater than the shortest polymer (19a, DP of 35)
on a saccharide residue basis. Although useful for compari-
son, this calculation underestimates the relative increase in
potency. The individual saccharide (3,6-disulfogalactose)
does not bind to L-selectinsa multivalent display is required.
Because the polymers possess a single fluorophore label,
their ability to bind multiple copies of L-selectin at the cell
surface could be determined. The concentration of polymer
required to saturate the fluorescence intensity (Bmax) was
measured. Dividing the average amount of L-selectin on a
Jurkat cell-surface by the calculated concentrations of bound
ligand provides an estimate of the relative stoichiometry of
the L-selectin-ligand complexes. By this analysis, polymer
19c (DP of 150) bound approximately five copies of
L-selectin while polymer 19a (DP of 35) bound only one or
two copies of L-selectin. These data indicate that compounds
19a-c engage in multivalent interactions with L-selectin and
that the stoichiometry of the resulting complex depends on
the valency of the ligand. This result is consistent with studies
Acknowledgment. This work was supported in part by
the NIH (GM 55984). The UW-Madison Chemistry NMR
facility is supported in part by NSF (CHE9629688 and
CHE9208463) and the NIH (RR08389). R.M.O thanks
Pharmacia Corporation and Eastman Chemical Company for
fellowships. J.E.G. was supported by the NIH Biotechnology
Training Program (GM08349). The authors thank R. J.
Hinklin, C. W. Cairo, and J. K. Pontrello for helpful
discussions and the laboratories of Profs S. Bednarek and
P. Friesen (UW-Madison) for generous use of equipment.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
cedures and characterization data for compounds 6, 9, 10,
12, 13, 15, 18, and 19. This material is available free of
OL0259239
(31) (a) Burke, S. D.; Zhao, Q.; Schuster, M. C.; Kiessling, L. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4518-4519. (b) Gestwicki, J. E.; Strong, L. E.;
Kiessling, L. L. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, 583-591. (c) Gestwicki, J. E.; Strong,
L. E.; Cairo, C. W.; Boehm, F. J.; Kiessling, L. L. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9,
163-169. (d) Gestwicki, J. E.; Kiessling, L. L. Nature 2002, 415, 81-84.
(32) (a) Sanders, W. J.; Gordon, E. J.; Dwir, O.; Beck, P. J.; Alon, R.;
Kiessling, L. L. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 5271-5278. (b) Manning, D.
D.; Bertozzi, C. R.; Pohl, N. L.; Rosen, S. D.; Kiessling, L. L. J. Org.
Chem. 1995, 60, 6254-6255.
(33) Gordon, E. J.; Sanders, W. J.; Kiessling, L. L. Nature 1998, 392,
30-31.
(34) Simanek, E. E.; McGarvey, G. J.; Jablonowski, J. A.; Wong, C. H.
Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 833-862.
(28) See the Supporting Information.
(29) Kd values were calculated on a saccharide residue basis.
(30) Degree of polymerization (DP) was determined from the integration
of 1H NMR signals in the phenyl region against those in the alkene region.
2296
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 14, 2002