C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Enantioselective Allylation of Aldehydes with (S,S)-3
While optimization will be required for greater reaction efficiency,
these results establish that diamines may allow for the highly
enantioselective allylation of a broad range of aldehydes.
We have described the development of a new chiral reagent for
the enantioselective allylation of aliphatic aldehydes. While the
search for other auxiliaries that give higher selectivities will
continue, and the performance of reagent 3 with more complex
(chiral) aldehydes remains to be investigated, the convenience and
practicality associated with reagent 3 recommend it for immediate
use with simple aliphatic aldehydes. In addition, it has been shown
that simply by constraining silicon in a five-membered ring with
1,2-diols, 1,2-diamines and 1,2-amino alcohols, sufficient Lewis
acidity for uncatalyzed aldehyde allylation reactions obtains. The
use of this discovery for the development of other reactions should
prove possible and will be reported in due course.10
Acknowledgment. The National Institutes of Health (National
Institute of General Medical Sciences: R01 GM58133) is acknowl-
edged for financial support of this work. We thank the Sumitomo
Corp. for postdoctoral support to K.K. J.L.L. is a recipient of a
Bristol-Myers Squibb Unrestricted Grant in Synthetic Organic
Chemistry and a Pfizer Award for Creativity in Organic Chemistry.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
characterization data, and stereochemical proofs (PDF). This material
a Reactions run with silane 3 (1.5 mmol) and aldehyde (1.0 mmol) in
toluene (5 mL) at -10 °C for 2 h. b Isolated yield. c Determined by chiral
HPLC analysis or by the Mosher ester method. d Reaction time ) 24 h.
e Due to product volatility, an alternative workup and purification was
employed. See the Supporting Information.
References
(1) (a) Denmark, S. E.; Almstead, N. G. In Modern Carbonyl Chemistry;
Otera, J., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000; Chapter 10. (b) Chemler,
S. R.; Roush, W. R. In Modern Carbonyl Chemistry; Otera, J., Ed.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, 2000; Chapter 11. (c) Herold, Th.; Hoffmann, R. W.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 768. (d) Brown, H. C.; Jadhav, P.
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2092. (e) Jadhav, P. K.; Bhat, K. S.;
Perumal, P. T.; Brown, H. C. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 432. (f) Racherla,
U. S.; Brown, H. C. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 401. (g) Roush, W. R.;
Walts, A. E.; Hoong, L. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 8186. (h) Roush,
W. R.; Banfi, W. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3979. (i) Short, R. P.;
Masamune, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1892. (j) Corey, E. J.; Yu,
C.-M.; Kim, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5495. (k) Faller, J. W.;
Linebarrier, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1937. (l) Hafner, A.;
Duthaler, R. O.; Marti, R.; Rihs, G.; Rothe-Streit, P.; Schwarzenbach, F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 2321.
(2) For a recent review of enantioselective Lewis acid-catalyzed allylmetal
additions, see: (a) Yanagisawa, A. In ComprehensiVe Asymmetric
Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer-
Verlag: Heidelberg, 1999; Vol. II, Chapter 27. Enantioselective Lewis
base catalysis: (b) Denmark, S. E.; Fu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
9488 and references therein.
(3) (a) Myers, A. G.; Kephart, S. E.; Chen, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
7922. (b) Denmark, S. E.; Griedel, B, D.; Coe, D. M. J. Org. Chem. 1993,
58, 988. (c) Denmark, S. E.; Griedel, B, D.; Coe, D. M.; Schnute, M. E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7026. (d) Matsumoto, K.; Oshima, K.;
Utimoto, K. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 7152. (e) K. Omoto, Y. Sawada, H.
Fujimoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1750.
(4) (a) Zacuto, M. J.; Leighton, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8587. (b)
O’Malley, S. J.; Leighton, J. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2915.
(5) (a) Wang, Z.; Wang, D.; Sui, X. Chem. Commun. 1996, 2261. (b) Wang,
D.; Wang, Z. G.; Wang, M. W.; Chen, Y. J.; Liu, L.; Zhu, Y.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 327.
for long periods of time (several weeks, at least) obviating the need
to freshly prepare 3 for each use. (3) The workup and purification
consist of the addition of 1 N HCl and EtOAc, separation of the
layers, and concentration, to give the homoallylic alcohol product
in typically >90% purity.
Mechanistically, we envision that complexation of the aldehyde
to the silane to give a trigonal bipyramidal intermediate is followed
by allyl transfer. Whether the two diastereomers of reagent 3 react
identically or differently remains an open question as a complex-
ation-pseudorotation-decomplexation sequence could lead to
interconversion. Experiments designed to elucidate this issue are
in progress.8
Finally, we note that 1,2-diamines also may serve as effective
auxiliaries. Reaction of (1R,2R)-N,N′-dibenzylcyclohexane-1,2-
diamine9 with allyltrichlorosilane and DBU in CH2Cl2, and filtration
of the resulting ammonium salts gave allylsilane 4 in >95% yield
and sufficient purity (>95%) for use in allylation reactions (eq 1).
(6) Zhang, L. C.; Sakurai, H.; Kira, M. Chem. Lett. 1997, 129.
(7) For a discussion of this type of Lewis base activation and lead references,
see: Denmark, S. E.; Fu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12021.
(8) Preliminary attempts to separate the diastereomers or to obtain a mixture
with a ratio different than 2:1 have failed.
(9) Denmark, S. E.; Stadler, H.; Dorow, R. L.; Kim, J. H. J. Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 5063.
(10) We have preliminarily examined crotylation reactions in this context and
found the enantioselectivities to be moderately lower. Details of our
attempts to optimize these reactions will be reported as indicated.
Treatment of 4 with benzaldehyde in benzene resulted in a slow
allylation to give alcohol 2(S) in 46% yield and 90% ee, and under
identical conditions dihydrocinnamaldehyde could be allylated in
58% yield and 95% ee (eq 2).
JA0264908
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 27, 2002 7921