ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
LETTER
by compound 1, shown in Table 1. The deeper penetration of the
aliphatic 5-O-methyl group in compound 1 into a region of the
active site lined predominantly by aliphatic carbons would not
be inconsistent with this interpretation. Furthermore, using the
same modeling procedure and superposing the liganded struc-
tures of rabbit muscle aldolase bound with FBP and MBP12
predicts identical interactions by FBP and MBP in T. brucei
aldolase, and neither ligand makes close contact with Ala-312
(data not shown).
the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
and Canadian Institutes for Health Research.
’ REFERENCES
(1) Feasey, N.; Wansbrough-Jones, M.; Mabey, D. C. W.; Solomon,
A. W. Neglected tropical diseases. Br. Med. Bull. 2010, 93, 179–200.
(2) Malvy, D.; Chappuis, F. Sleeping sickness. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.
2011, 17, 986–995.
The indistinguishable interactions by FBP and MBP in both
aldolases are consistent with their similar Km and IC50 values in
both aldolases, shown in Table 1, and corroborate the surrogate
modeling strategy. Modeling of compounds 2, 3, and 4 using
compound 1 as template would result in steric clashes with active
site residues in both aldolases, necessitating binding modes that
are different from those observed for FBP, MBP, and compound
1 and presumably of lower affinity, as shown in Table 1. Similarly,
modeling of the binding modes for compounds 5, 6, and 7 based
on that of compound 1 could not be accommodated due to steric
clashes in the active site of both aldolases and consistent with
active site interactions resulting in poorer affinity by these
compounds, as seen in Table 1.
(3) Michels, P. A. M.; Hannaert, V.; Bringaud, F. Metabolic aspects
of glycosomes in trypanosomatidae—new data and views. Parasitol.
Today 2000, 16, 482–489.
(4) Verlinde, C. L. M. J.; Hannaert, V.; Blonski, C.; Willson, M.;
Perie, J. J.; Fothergill-Gilmore, L. A.; Opperdoes, F. R.; Gelb, M. H.; Hol,
W. G. J.; Michels, P. A. M. Glycolysis as a target for the design of new
anti-trypanosome drugs. Drug Resist. Updates 2001, 4, 50–65.
(5) Albert, M.-A.; Haanstra, J. R.; Hannaert, V.; Van Roy, J.;
Opperdoes, F. R.; Bakker, B. M.; Michels, P. A. M. Experimental and
in Silico Analyses of Glycolytic Flux Control in Bloodstream Form
Trypanosoma brucei. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 28306–28315.
(6) Cꢀaceres, A. J.; Michels, P. A. M.; Hannaert, V. Genetic validation
of aldolase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as drug
targets in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2010,
169, 50–54.
The present selectivity, not exceeding a factor of 4, is obviously
too small for therapeutic utilization. One positive result, how-
ever, is that MBP derivatives bearing bulky groups at O-5 (C-5)
retain appreciable inhibitory properties. Modeling of the 5-O-
CH2F group in compound 1 suggests binding by such a
compound upon active site adjustment; however, the gain in
interaction energies rarely exceeds 1 kcal/mol.22 In this regard,
derivatives bearing short reactive functions at C-5 could be
introduced to act as irreversible selective inactivators. The
proposed studies would take advantage of docking calculations
of the compounds bound in the active site of the two enzymes
and followed up by structure determination of appropriate en-
zymeÀinhibitor complexes. Additional studies to be performed
would include the use of mutational analyses in concert with
structural and/or kinetic data to corroborate the role of active site
residues responsible for selectivity, as described previously.23
(7) Marchand, M.; Poliszczak, A.; Gibson, W. C.; Wierenga, R. K.;
Opperdoes, F. R.; Michels, P. A. Characterization of the genes for
fructose-bisphosphate aldolase in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem.
Parasitol. 1988, 65–75.
(8) Chudzik, D. M.; Michels, P. A.; de Walque, S.; Hol, W. G.
Structures of type 2 peroxisomal targeting signals in two trypanosomatid
aldolases. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 300, 697–707.
(9) Dax, C.; Duffieux, F.; Chabot, N.; Coincon, M.; Sygusch, J.;
Michels, P. A. M.; Blonski, C. Selective Irreversible Inhibition of
Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphate Aldolase from Trypanosoma brucei. J. Med.
Chem. 2006, 49, 1499–1502.
(10) Ginsburg, A.; Mehler, A. H. Specific Anion Binding to Fructose
Diphosphate Aldolase from Rabbit Muscle. Biochemistry 1966,
5, 2623–2634.
(11) Mabiala-Bassiloua, C.-G.; Zwolinska, M.; Therisod, H.; Sygusch,
J.; Therisod, M. Separate synthesis and evaluation of glucitol bis-
phosphate and mannitol bis-phosphate, as competitive inhibitors of
fructose bis-phosphate aldolases. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18,
1735–1737.
(12) St-Jean, M.; Lafrance-Vanasse, J.; Liotard, B.; Sygusch, J. High
Resolution Reaction Intermediates of Rabbit Muscle Fructose-1,6-bi-
sphosphate Aldolase: Substrate Cleavage And Induced Fit. J. Biol. Chem.
2005, 280, 27262–27270.
(13) The two phosphate groups of MBP are indistinguishable
because of C2 symmetry in the molecule with respect to a symmetry
axis centred on the C3ÀC4 bond. Assignment of the P1- and P6-
phosphates in MBP was made on the basis of the distinguishable binding
loci of the P1- and P6-phosphate moieties of FBP in the active site
environment.10
(14) Chudzik, D. M.; Michels, P. A.; de Walque, S.; Hol, W. G. J.
Structures of type 2 peroxisomal targeting signals in two trypanosomatid
aldolases. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 300, 697–707.
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S
Supporting Information. Detailed syntheses and char-
b
acterizations of compounds 1À7, and crystallographic experi-
mental procedures. This material is available free of charge via the
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*E-mail: jurgen.sygusch@umontreal.ca or michel.therisod@
u-psud.fr.
Author Contributions
(15) Mehler, A. H.; Cusic, M. E., Jr. Aldolase Reaction with Sugar
Diphosphates. Science 1967, 155, 1101–1103.
C.-G.M-B.: Chemical syntheses, kinetic measurements; G.A-C.:
Crystallographic studies; V.H.: preparation of recombinant T.b.
FBA; H.T.: kinetic measurements, preparation of enzymes; J.S.:
Crystallographic studies, preparation of manuscript; M.T.: ki-
netic measurements, preparation of manuscript, and supervision
of C.-G.M.-B. Ph.D.
(16) Richards, O. C.; Rutter, W. J. Comparative Properties of Yeast
and Muscle Aldolase. J. Biol. Chem. 1961, 236, 3185–3192.
(17) Horecker, B. L.; Smyrniotis, P. Z.; Hiatt, H. H.; Marks, P. A.
Tetrose phosphate and the formation of sedoheptulose diphosphate. J.
Biol. Chem. 1955, 212, 827–836.
(18) Midelfort, C. F.; Gupta, R. K.; Rose, I. A. Fructose 1,6-bispho-
sphate: isomeric composition, kinetics, and substrate specificity for the
aldolases. Biochemistry 1976, 15, 2178–2185.
Funding Sources
This work was supported by a scholarship to C.-G.M.-B. from
Government of the Rꢀepublique du Congo. J.S. was supported by
(19) Analytical data available in Supporting Information.
807
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ml200129s |ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 804–808