thesis of DAP, the goal of orthogonal protection is
generally considered to be equally important. Recently,
a number of reports have appeared describing the ste-
reospecific synthesis of differentially protected DAP
derivatives.4,5 Most of these syntheses involve setting one
of the two chiral centers by stereoselective susbtrate-
directed reactions or the use of chiral reagents.
An Efficient RCM-Based Synthesis of
Orthogonally Protected meso-DAP and
FK565†
Juan R. Del Valle* and Murray Goodman‡
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of
California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 93027
The structure of DAP suggests that ring-closing
metathesis (RCM) can be an effective tool for construction
of the seven-membered carbon chain.6 Toward this end,
we envisioned the condensation of two olefin building
blocks, providing a suitable nine-carbon RCM substrate.
Following ring closure, hydrolysis of the cyclic intermedi-
ate at the original point of attachment would then
provide a linear carbon-bridged product. Here, we present
an efficient preparation of orthogonally protected meso-
DAP, and of the potent immunostimulatory DAP-
containing peptide FK565, based on this condensation-
ring-close-ring-open sequence.
In planning our synthesis, D-vinylglycine and L-allyl-
glycine (1) were initially selected as appropriate chiral
synthons, but the known tendency for vinylglycine to
isomerize5e prompted us to turn to D-vinylglycinol (2) as
an alternative four-carbon building block. Vinylglycinol
is also advantageous in providing an additional site for
condensation, via the hydroxyl group. Thus, two viable
retrosynthetic routes are depicted in Scheme 1. The cyclic
olefins represent key lactone and lactam intermediates
resulting from the RCM of linear ester and amide
precursors, respectively.
Our synthesis of the desired ester RCM substrate, from
Boc-D-vinylglycinol7 and Cbz-L-allylglycine (3), is depicted
in Scheme 2. Condensation of these building blocks
proceeded in good yield under Mitsunobu conditions to
give compound 4.
With the diene ester in hand, we turned our attention
to the corresponding amide intermediates for the lactam-
based strategy (Scheme 3). Although the lactam and
lactone routes are conceptually similar, the introduction
of a Boc group onto the amide nitrogen would be neces-
sary to allow for eventual hydrolysis.8 To avoid concomi-
tant protection of the carbamate nitrogen during this
Received August 16, 2004
Abstract: A condensation-ring-close-ring-open sequence
was employed for the synthesis of orthogonally protected
meso-2,6-diaminopimelic acid, starting from easily accessible
chiral synthons. Condensation of suitably protected L-allyl-
glycine and D-vinylglycinol derivatives was followed by
Grubbs’ ring-closing metathesis to generate the key lactam
intermediate. This strategy has been applied to a concise
total synthesis of the potent immunostimulatory peptide
FK565.
Peptidoglycan is a key structural component in the cell
walls of most pathogenic bacteria.1 The structural integ-
rity of the rigid peptidoglycan layer is highly dependent
on meso-2,6-diaminopimelic acid (meso-DAP), which acts
as a cross-linking agent between glycan strands.2 Pre-
sumably, therapeutics that inhibit the diaminopimelate
pathway will serve to disrupt the biopolymerization
process necessary for peptidoglycan formation. Because
mammals do not produce DAP, such inhibitors are not
likely to exhibit toxicity in humans, making them at-
tractive drug targets in the search for novel antibacterial
agents.2 In addition, a number of peptidoglycan frag-
ments featuring the DAP residue exhibit antitumor,
immunostimulant, and sleep-inducing biological activity.3
DAP is thus a versatile building block with a number of
potential medicinal applications.
To obtain DAP derivatives of practical synthetic value,
a preparative strategy should allow for functional group
differentiation and be amenable to analogue synthesis.
Although stereospecificity is a key objective in the syn-
† Dedicated to the memory of Professor Murray Goodman, for a
lifetime of achievements in bioorganic chemistry.
(4) For examples of DAP derivative syntheses based on asymmetric
alkylations, see: (a) Williams, R. M.; Yuan, C. G. J. Org. Chem. 1992,
57, 6519-6527. (b) Williams, R. M.; Yuan, C. G. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 6190-6193. (c) Jurgens, A. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4727-
4730. (d) Paradisi, F.; Porzi, G.; Sandri, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2001, 12, 3319-3324.
(5) For examples of DAP derivative syntheses based on chiral
catalysis, see: (a) Wang, W.; Xiong, C. Y.; Yang, J. Q.; Hruby, V. J.
Synthesis (Stuttgart) 2002, 94-98. (b) Collier, P. N.; Campbell, A. D.;
Patel, I.; Taylor, R. J. K. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 6117-6125. (c) Collier,
P. N.; Patel, I.; Taylor, R. J. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5953-
5954. (d) Sutherland, A.; Vederas, J. C. Chem. Commun. 2002, 224-
225. (e) Gao, Y.; Lane-Bell, P.; Vederas, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
2133-2143. (f) Davis, F. A.; Srirajan, V. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3248-
3251. (g) Hernandez, N.; Martin, V. S. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4934-
4938. (h) Roberts, J. L.; Chan, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7679-
7682.
‡ Deceased June 1, 2004.
(1) (a) In Bacterial Cell Wall; Ghuysen, J.-M., Hakenbeck, R., Eds.;
Elsevier Science BV: Amsterdam, 1994. (b) Lazar, K.; Walker, S. Curr.
Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 786-793. (c) Katz, A. H.; Caufield, C. E.
Curr. Pharm. Des. 2003, 9, 857-866. (d) van Heijenoort, J. Nat. Prod.
Rep. 2001, 18, 503-519. (e) van Heijenoort, J. Glycobiology 2001, 11,
25R-36R.
(2) Patte, J.-C. In Amino Acids: Biosynthesis and Genetic Regula-
tion; Herrmann, K. M., Somerville, R. L., Eds.; Addison-Wesley:
Reading, MA, 1983.
(3) (a) Johannsen, L.; Wecke, J.; Obal, F.; Krueger, J. M. Am. J.
Phys. 1991, 260, R126-R133. (b) Luker, K. E.; Tyler, A. N.; Marshall,
G. R.; Goldman, W. E. Mol. Microbiol. 1995, 16, 733-743. (c) Takada,
H.; Kawabata, Y.; Kawata, S.; Kusumoto, S. Infect. Immun. 1996, 64,
657-659. (d) Gotoh, T.; Nakahara, K.; Iwami, M.; Aoki, H.; Imanaka,
H. J. Antibiot. 1982, 35, 1280-1285. (e) Hemmi, K.; Takeno, H.; Okada,
S.; Nakaguchi, O.; Kitaura, Y.; Hashimoto, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981,
103, 7026-7028. (f) Kitaura, Y.; Nakaguchi, O.; Takeno, H.; Okada,
S.; Yonishi, S.; Hemmi, K.; Mori, J.; Senoh, H.; Mine, Y.; Hashimoto,
M. J. Med. Chem. 1982, 25, 335-337. (g) Gotoh, T.; Nakahara, K.;
Nishiura, T.; Hashimoto, M.; Kino, T.; Kuroda, Y.; Okuhara, M.;
Kohsaka, M.; Aoki, H.; Imanaka, H. J. Antibiot. 1982, 35, 1286-1292.
(6) (a) The groups of Vederas and Williams have investigated the
use of RCM in the synthesis of differentially protected 2,7-diamino-
suberic acid derivatives. See ref 5e and (b) Williams, R. M.; Liu, J. W.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2130-2132.
(7) Campbell, A. D.; Raynham, T. M.; Taylor, R. J. K. Synthesis
(Stuttgart) 1998, 1707-1709.
10.1021/jo0485738 CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/09/2004
8946
J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 8946-8948