of 2 for C60 is only 3 times as large as that of 12. This can be
rationalized by the complexation of 2 to C60.10 It appears that
the quenching is mainly due to the intermolecular collision;
however, a small portion of the intramolecular quenching
process should contribute to the quenching. A more obvious
contribution of the intramolecular quenching process in the
bound state is seen in the luminescence quenching of 1 with the
fullerenes. The apparent quenching rate constants (kqapp) are
expressed as follows:
app
kq
= kq[G]0 for 2 and 12
= kq[G] + kqA for 1
Fig. 1 Luminescence changes induced on sensor 1 (1.0 3 1025 mol L21):
(left) in the absence of fullerenes, (middle) with C60, (right) with C70
app
kq
.
where [G]0 and [G] denote the concentration of total and
unbound guests, respectively. The apparent quenching rate
constants (kqapp) were calculated using the Ka value and the total
fullerene concentration of 5.6 3 1026 mol L21 (12: kqapp(C60)
= 7.1 3 104 s21, kqapp(C70) = 4.9 3 104 s21; 2: kqapp(C60) =
21 3 104 s21; 1: kqapp(C60) = 200 3 104 s21, kqapp(C70) = 120
3 104 s21). The apparent luminescence quenching rate
constants of 1 for C60 and C70 are over 20 times higher than that
of 12 at that concentration. This suggests that the apparent
quenching rate constant is strongly associated with the concen-
tration of the bound fullerene; thus, the high binding ability of
1 toward C60 and C70 brings about the extremely high sensitivity
and selectivity11 to them even at concentrations of less than
1025 mol L21
.
We have demonstrated the first example of the highly
sensitive detection of fullerenes using calix[5]arene-based
sensors produced by the combination of the supramolecular
concept and the luminescence technique.
Fig. 2 Steady-state luminescence spectra (lexc = 400 nm) of 1 (5.6 3 1026
mol L21) in toluene upon the addition of C60: a; 0, b; 0.67, c; 1.3, d; 2.0, e;
3.3, f; 4.7, g; 6.0, h; 8.7 (3 1025 mol L21).
Notes and references
1 P. D. Beer and P. A. Gale, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.., 2001, 40, 486; E. V.
Anslyn and J. J. Lavigne, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 3118.
2 T. Haino, M. Yanase and Y. Fukazawa, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998,
37, 997; T. Haino, M. Yanase and Y. Fukazawa, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1997, 38, 3739; T. Haino, M. Yanase and Y. Fukazawa, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 259.
3 D. Sun, F. S. Tham, C. A. Reed, L. Chker, M. Burgess and P. D. W.
Boyd, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 100704; K. Tashiro, T. Aida, J.-Y.
Zheng, K. Kinbara, K. Saigo, S. Sakamoto and K. Yamaguchi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 9477; J. L. Atwood, L. J. Barbour, P. J. Nichols,
C. L. Raston and C. A. Sandoval, Chem. Eur. J., 1999, 5, 990; M. J.
Hardie and C. L. Raston, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1153; H. Matsubara,
T. Shimura, A. Hasegawa, M. Semba, K. Asano and K. Yamamoto,
Chem. Lett., 1998, 1099; K. Tsubaki, K. Takayoshi, T. Kinoshita and K.
Fuji, Chem. Commun., 1998, 895; N. S. Isaacs, P. J. Nicholls, C. L.
Raston, C. A. Sandova and D. J. Young, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1839;
A. Drljaca, C. Kepert, L. Spiccia, C. L. Raston, C. A. Sandoval and T.
D. Smith, Chem. Commun., 1997, 195; T. Andersson, G. Westman, G.
Stenhagen, M. Sundahl and O. Wennerström, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995,
36, 597; J. L. Atwood, G. A. Koutsantonis and C. L. Raston, Nature,
1994, 368, 229; T. Suzuki, K. Nakashima and S. Shinkai, Chem. Lett.,
1994, 699; Z. Yoshida, H. Takekuma, S. Takekuma and Y. Matsubara,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 1597.
4 T. Haino, H. Araki, Y. Yamanaka and Y. Fukazawa, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2001, 42, 3203.
5 B. Förster, J. Bertran, F. Teixidor and C. Viñas, J. Organomet. Chem.,
1999, 587, 67.
6 I. Hamachi, S. Tanaka, S. Tsukiji, S. Shinkai and S. Oishi, Inorg. Chem.,
1998, 37, 4380.
7 M. H. Todd, S. Balasubramanian and C. Abell, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997,
38, 6781.
Fig. 3 Stern–Volmer plots of sensors 1, 2 and 12 (5.6 3 1026 mol L21) in
the presence of fullerenes in toluene. The symbols represent the experi-
mental data and the solid lines are given by curve-fitting analysis (1: C70 vs.
1; Ω: vs. 1; 3: C60 vs. 2; +: C60 vs. 12).
molecular quenching process between the bound fullerene and
the lumophore of the complex. It is known that the receptor
bearing two calix[5]arenes shows remarkably strong binding
ability to the fullerenes in toluene.2 Although these plots
qualitatively account for the effect of the fullerene complexa-
tion, more detailed understanding is required to discuss the
quenching properties. For this, luminescence lifetime measure-
ments and the determination of the quenching rate constants
were carried out.
The luminescence lifetimes (t0) of 1, 2 and 12 in toluene were
determined to be 41.4 ns (1), 39.3 ns (2), and 34.5 ns (12),
respectively, by nanosecond laser spectroscopy. The quenching
rate constants (kq)9 on 2 and 12 for C60 or C70 were determined
on the basis of the Stern–Volmer plots and the luminescence
lifetimes (2: kq(C60) = 37.4 3 109 M21 s21, 12: kq(C60) = 12.7
3 109 M21 s21 and kq(C70) = 8.8 3 109 M21 s21). On the other
hand, the non-linear curve fitting analysis of the Stern-Volmer
plots for sensor 1 with C60 or C70 yielded both the inter-
molecular (kq) and the intramolecular quenching rate constants
(kqA) in the bound state, and the binding constants (Ka) (kq(C60)
8 K. A. Walters, L. L. Premvardhan, Y. Liu, L. A. Peteanu and K. S.
Schanze, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2001, 339, 255.
9 The quenching rate conctants of 12 for C60 and C70 were determined by
Stern–Volmer plots of the fullerene concentration vs. t0/t.
10 2: Ka(C60) = 1100 M21; 11: Ka(C60) = 1060 M21, Ka(C70) = 170
M21
.
11 A control experiment with anthracene as a small guest was carried out
= 5.7 3 109 M21 s21, kqA(C60) = 0.0020 3 109 s21, Ka
=
to test the selectivity of 1. A Stern–Volmer plot of 1 produced kq (21.2
71000 M21; kq(C70) = 12 3 109 M21 s21, kqA(C70) = 0.0012
3 109 s21, Ka = 360000 M21).
3 109 M21 21) and kqapp (11.9 3 104 s21 at a total guest concentration
s
of 5.6 3 1026 mol L21) is 17 times as small as that of 1 with C60. This
indicates that sensor 1 shows selective detection of fullerenes even if a
small aromatic guest is present.
Slight enhancement of the quenching rate was observed
between 2 and 12 for C60. The relative quenching rate constant
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 2148–2149
2149