L. L. Brockunier et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 4763–4766
4765
BOC
d-f, b
g, b
h, b
b
BOC
14-17
19
NH
O
R
NH
O
R
R
N
N
a
c
HN
N
Ph
NH
N
Ph
20
X
X
7
6
8
b
21, 24-32
18
Scheme 2. Diastereoselective synthesis of compounds 14–32. Reagents: (a) (R)-ArCH2CH(NHBoc)CH2CO2H, EDC, HOBt, DIEA, DMF; (b) TFA,
CH2Cl2; (c) H2, Pd(OH)2, MeOH [for compound 28 ACE–Cl, ClCH2CH2Cl]; (d) a-Cl-3-NO2-acetanilide, DIEA, DMF; (e) H2, Pd(OH)2, MeOH; (f)
˚
MsCl, pyridine, CH2Cl2; (g) 2-chloroacetamide, DIEA, DMF; (h) NaBH(OAc)3, (CH2O)n, 4A mol. sieves, ClCH2CH2Cl.
removed by hydrogenolysis (or by treatment with 1-
chloroethyl chloroformate when R=4-thiazolylmethyl)
and the resultant intermediate 8 converted to com-
pounds 14–17 by elaboration of the right-hand side as
discussed in Scheme 1. Alkylation of 8 with 2-chloro-
acetamide and Boc removal provided compound 19.
Reductive amination of 8 with paraformaldehyde fol-
lowed by deprotection of the Boc group gave compound
20. Compounds 21 and 24–32 were prepared by Boc de-
protection of 8. The requisite precursor of morpholine
analog 22 was synthesized according to literature prece-
dent.6 Compound 23 was synthesized from racemic 2-
benzylpiperidine.
Having demonstrated the dramatic influence of amine
stereochemistry on DP-IV inhibitory potency, we then
wished to define the stereochemical preference of the
substituent at the 2-position of the piperazine ring.
The individual diastereomers were prepared as described
in Scheme 2 and the compounds evaluated in vitro (Ta-
ble 2). Once again there was a strong preference for one
isomer. For the 2-fluoro analog, the (R,R) diastereomer
15 was 50-fold more potent (DP-IV IC50 =14nM) than
the corresponding (R,S) isomer 17. Importantly, com-
pound 15 also had an excellent selectivity profile as it
was >1000-fold selective over QPP.
With potent and selective DP-IV inhibitors now in hand,
we wanted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of
compounds in this series. The initial results were not
encouraging: compound 15 had an unusually high clear-
ance (130mL/min/kg) and low (<1%) oral bioavailabi-
lity when dosed in rats.9 To address this issue we first
began simplifying the molecule by truncation of the
right-hand side at various points. Gratifyingly, the low
molecular weight unsubstituted piperazine 21 and
morpholine 22 retained good in vitro potency (DP-IV
IC50 =139 and 108nM, respectively) and excellent selec-
tivity (>700- and >900-fold, respectively) over QPP (Ta-
ble 3). Interestingly, a significant loss in potency (DP-IV
IC50 =1040nM) was observed with piperidine com-
pound 23.
All compounds synthesized were tested for DP-IV activ-
ity and selectivity over DP-IV homologs and other
proline specific enzymes with DP-IV-like activity.7,8
Without exception, the piperazine analogs described
herein are inactive (IC50Õs >100lM) at PEP (prolyl
endopeptidase), prolidase, and APP (aminopeptidase
P) and as such these data will not be presented.
However, some inhibition of QPP (quiescent cell pro-
line peptidase, also known as DPP-II or DPP7), which
has been implicated to play a role in immune function,
has been observed in this series. Thus inhibitory poten-
tial of test compounds at DP-IV and QPP will be
reported.
The work described in the previous paper focused on the
optimization of a b-homophenylalanine thiazolidide ser-
ies and we hoped to utilize this information in the design
of analogs in the piperazine series. A key modification
was the introduction of one or more fluorine atoms on
the phenyl ring. In particular, the 3,4-difluoro and 2-
fluoro-substituted analogs were quite promising, thus
the corresponding isomers were prepared in the pipera-
zine series. While the (R) stereochemistry was shown to
be essential in the thiazolidide series, we wanted to con-
firm this in the structurally unique piperazine series. As
shown in Table 1, the same general trend for increased
DP-IV inhibitory potency when going from the unsub-
stituted phenyl analog 3 to the 3,4-difluorophenyl ana-
log 9 (3-fold increase) and the 2-fluorophenyl analog
10 (4-fold increase) was also observed in the piperazine
series. Preference for the (R) stereochemistry of the
b-amino amide moiety is clearly maintained. Most inter-
estingly, there was quite a pronounced increase in selec-
tivity (>350-fold) over QPP seen with the 2-fluorophenyl
analog and, therefore, the remaining SAR studies con-
centrated primarily on this substitution pattern.
We next began a survey of replacements of the benzyl
group at the 2-position of the piperazine ring, which
would not have the potential metabolic liabilities of an
unsubstitued phenyl ring. As shown in Table 4, removal
of the benzyl group altogether, or replacement by an
alkyl group resulted in a significant loss of potency.
The 4-fluorophenyl compound 27, lacking a benzylic
methylene group, suffered a 4-fold loss in DP-IV inhib-
itory potency whereas all of the other benzylic aromatic
groups were of comparable potency (DP-IV IC50s of
143–166nM) and selectivity (>600-fold over QPP) to
that of the unsubstituted benzylic analog 21.
The preceding paper1 describes the dramatic effect on
potency when additional fluorine atoms are incorpo-
rated into the fluorophenyl b-amino amide moiety of a
thiazolidide series of DP-IV inhibitors. Thus, the 2,5-di-
fluorophenyl and 2,4,5-trifluorophenyl analogs are 3-
and 7-fold more potent, respectively, than the 2-fluoro-
phenyl analog. We were also interested in incorporating
these same modifications into the current piperazine