Zhang et al.
62.4, 126.0, 126.2, 128.5, 148.1 ppm. MS m/z (EI) 177 (M+),
91, 58. HRMS (DEI) calcd for C12H20N 178.159575 (MH+),
found 178.159111.
beads having a 2% cross-linking of divinylbenzene. Under
these reaction conditions, analysis with a bright-field,
optical microscope indicates there is little damage to the
polystyrene beads. However, if marcoporous beads (poly-
styrene-co-divinylbenzene) are used, the beads show
massive structural damage. Microscopic cracks and pit-
ting is evident on the surface of the porous beads.
Evidently, the macroporous beads absorb significant
quantities of TfOH prior to any amine functionalization
and the superacid cleaves some of the polystyrene
surface.
Eth yl(2-m eth yl-2-p h en ylp r op yl)a m in e (21). 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 1.08 (t, J ) 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.23 (s, 1H), 1.36
(s, 6H), 2.56 (q, J ) 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.75 (s, 2H), 7.16-7.40 (m,
10H) ppm. 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 15.3, 27.7, 38.8, 45.0,
62.4, 126.0, 126.2, 128.5, 148.1 ppm. MS m/z (EI) 177 (M+),
162, 58. HRMS calcd for C12H20N 178.159575 (MH+), found
178.159111.
1-(2-P h en ylp r op yl)-1H-im id a zole (22). 1H NMR (CDCl3,
300 MHz) δ 1.27 (d, J ) 6.9 Hz, 3H), 3.02-3.10 (m, 1H), 4.02
(d, J ) 7.5 Hz, 3H), 6.72 (s, 1H), 6.97 (s, 1H), 7.60-7.23 (m,
2H), 7.18-7.36 (m, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ
18.8, 41.9, 54.5, 119.4, 127.2, 127.3, 129.0, 129.4, 137.6, 142.9
ppm. MS m/z (EI) 186 (M+), 105, 82. HRMS (EI+) calcd for
Con clu sion
In summary, we have found that olefinic amines and
heterocycles react with arenes in the Bronsted superacid,
CF3SO3H. We propose that olefinic amines are protonated
twice to generate reactive dicationic intermediates. These
doubly charged electrophiles are sufficiently reactive to
attack moderately deactivated arenes such as o-dichlo-
robenzene. Polystyrene beads can be conveniently func-
tionalized by olefinic amines in reactions catalyzed by
TfOH.
C
12H14N2 186.115699, found 186.115742.
4-Meth yl-5-(1-ph en yleth yl)th iazole (26). 1H NMR (CDCl3,
300 MHz) δ 1.67 (d, J ) 6.9 Hz, 3H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 4.38 (q, J )
6.9 Hz, 1H), 7.19-7.33 (m, 5H), 8.57 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 15.5, 24.2, 37.8, 126.8, 127.2, 128.9, 129.5,
145.1, 149.4, 149.5 ppm. MS m/z (EI) 203 (M+), 188. HRMS
calcd for C12H13NS 203.076871, found 203.077637.
Cin n a m ylp ip er a zin e F u n ction a lized P olystyr en e 39.
A 1.0-g sample of polystyrene is suspended in 15 mL of CHCl3
and 0.2011 g (1.0 mmol) of trans-1-cinnamylpiperazine (3) is
added. To this solution is added 4 mL of triflic acid and the
solution is stirred overnight at room temperature and then
poured over about 50 g of ice. The solution is made basic with
1.0 M NaOH, and after an hour of stirring, the functionalized
polymer is filtered off and rinsed thoroughly with deionized
water. The solids are rinsed three times with anhydrous ether
and then dried with heating under vacuum to yield ap-
proximately 1.2 g of a granular, tan solid. Anal. Calcd for 1.0
mmol of cinnamylpiperazine/g of polystyrene: C, 89.77; H,
7.90; N, 2.32. Found: C, 81.26; H, 7.32; N, 0.93. FTIR (KBr,
cm-1) 3448, 3020, 1380.
1-Ben zoyl-4-cin n a m ylp ip er a zin e F u n ction a lized P oly-
styr en e 40. A 1.0-g sample of polystyrene is reacted with
0.2013 g (0.66 mmol) of 1-benzoyl-4-cinnamylpiperazine (5) and
4 mL of triflic acid in CHCl3, using the procedure described
above, to yield approximately 1.2 g of a granular, tan solid.
Anal. Calcd for 0.66 mmol of 1-benzoyl-4-cinnamylpiperazine/g
of polystyrene: C, 90.0; H, 7.57; N, 1.50. Found: C, 88.18; H,
7.45; N, 0.98. FTIR (KBr, cm-1) 3018, 2918, 1628, 1607, 1495,
1449.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Compounds 1 and 2 were prepared from the reactions of
cinnamyl bromide with the appropriate heterocycle; com-
pounds 6 and 7 were prepared from N-benzyl-4-piperidone
with use of CH3PPh3Br:NaNH2 and (C6H5)CH2PPh3Br:BuLi,
respectively, and standard Wittig reaction procedures.13 All
other olefinic amines were purchased from commercial sup-
pliers. Products 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 23, 24, and 25 are known
compounds.14 Products 36, 37, and 38 were obtained as
inseparable mixtures of regioisomers. The triflic acid was
purchased from 3M and distilled from an argon atmosphere
prior to use. Polystyrene beads were purchased from com-
mercial suppliers. Microscopic analysis of functionalized poly-
mers was done with a Nikon Eclipse E-400 with Nikon Plan
lenses, using a Tungsten-halogen light source and an objective
of 40× (standard bright-field configuration).
Gen er a l Syn th etic P r oced u r e (P r od u cts 14-26). Ap-
proximately 0.2 g of the olefin is suspended in 2 mL of benzene
and 3 mL of TfOH is added. After being stirred for at least 3
h, the mixture is poured over ice, and it is made basic with
concentrated NaOH. The mixture is then extracted with CHCl3
and the organic phase is washed with brine, dried with MgSO4,
and concentrated under vacuum.
E t h yl(2-m et h yla llyl)a m in e F u n ct ion a lized P olyst y-
r en e 41. A 1.0-g sample of polystyrene is reacted with 0.20
mL (1.52 mmol) of ethyl(2-methylallyl)amine (5) and 1 mL of
triflic acid in 5 mL of CHCl3, using the procedure described
above, to yield approximately 1.1 g of a granular, tan solid.
Anal. Calcd for 1.52 mmol of ethyl(2-methylallyl)amine/g of
polystyrene: C, 89.75; H, 8.43; N, 1.82. Found: C, 88.60; H,
7.85; N, 0.71. FTIR (KBr, cm-1) 3438, 3022, 2914, 1603, 1490,
1445, 1386.
1-Ben zoyl-4-(3,3-d ip h en ylp r op yl)p ip er a zin e (18). 1H
NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 2.20-2.26 (m, 8H), 3.38-3.50 (m,
2H), 3.71-3.88 (m, 2H), 4.03 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.00-7.51
(m, 15H) ppm. 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 32.8, 42.3, 47.9,
49.2, 53.1, 53.7, 56.9, 126.5, 127.3, 128.1, 128.7, 128.8, 129.9,
136.1, 144.9, 170.5 ppm. MS m/z (EI) 384 (M+), 203, 105.
HRMS (DEI) calcd for C26H28N2O 384.220164, found 384.220624.
Eth yl(2-m eth yl-2-p h en ylp r op yl)a m in e (21). 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 1.01 (t, J ) 6.6 Hz, 3H), 1.23 (s, 1H), 1.36
(s, 6H), 2.56 (q, J ) 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.75 (s, 2H), 7.15-7.40 (m,
5H) ppm. 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 15.3, 27.7, 38.8, 45.0,
Ack n ow led gm en t. We are grateful to the NIH for
support of this work (SO6GM53933-0251). We also
thank Ms. Sarah de Leon, Mr. Siufu Lau, and Mr. Kevin
Franke for their kind assistance and we are indebted
to Professors George A. Olah and G. K. Surya Prakash
for the use of their NMR instruments at the University
of Southern California. We thank the manuscript re-
viewers for their comments.
(11) (a) Taylor, R. Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution; Wiley: New
York, 1990; Chapter 2. (b) Olah, G. A. Friedel-Crafts and Related
Reactions; Wiley: New York, 1964; Vol. 2, pp 597-640.
(12) Burgess, K. Solid-Phase Organic Synthesis; Wiley: New York,
1999.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Analytical data (1H
and 13C NMR spectra) for new compounds and literature
citations for known compounds. This material is available free
(13) Furniss, B. S.; Hannaford, A. J .; Smith, P. W. G.; Tatchell, A.
R. Vogel’s Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, 5th ed.; Wiley: New
York, 1989; pp 498-499.
(14) See Supporting Information.
J O030024Z
5122 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 13, 2003