adjacent carbons. At the reaction temperature this kind of
compound evolves toward the cyclopropane opening products
(Scheme 1).6 We know of only one case where a cyclopro-
Aminocarbene complexes 1 were treated with an excess
of monosubstituted olefins 2 in refluxing toluene until
complete disappearance of the starting complexes was
observed. The only product isolated from the reaction was
the corresponding cyclopropane 3, usually as a single
diastereomer (Table 1).10 It was found that the reaction
Scheme 1
Table 1. Cyclopropanation Reactions of Carbene Complexes 1
pane has been isolated from the reaction of an aminocarbene
complex with an alkene.7 In this elegant approach, Hegedus
et al. reduced the electron-donor ability of the nitrogen atom
by its inclusion in an aromatic pyrrol ring (Scheme 2), thus
making the complex more similar to an alkoxycarbene.
Scheme 2
The instability of the resulting aminocyclopropanes can
be avoided by reacting the carbene complexes with non-
conjugated olefins. We have recently developed a method
for the cyclopropanation of this type of olefin, its success
being based on the stabilization of reaction intermediate by
intramolecular coordination with a suitably placed donor
group.6 With the purpose of generalizing this reaction, we
recalled the recent publication of two syntheses of (alkoxy-
carbonyl)dialkylaminocarbene complexes,8 in which the ester
oxygen may serve for this kind of coordination. Furthermore,
the cyclopropanes so formed would be 1-aminocyclopro-
panecarboxylic acid (ACC) derivatives, which are interesting
compounds since they are present in a number of natural
and biologically active compounds, and can be used as
conformationally restricted analogues of proteinogenic amino
acids.9 We report herein our results in the cyclopropanation
of nonconjugated olefins with (alkoxycarbonyl)dialkylami-
nocarbene complexes, which turns out to be the first
successful cyclopropanation reaction of a dialkylaminocar-
bene.
tolerates aryl, alkyl, and alkenyl substituents in the olefin
(entries a, b, and d). The diastereoselectivity of the process
is in line with that described for the cyclopropanation of
nonconjugated olefins with alkoxycarbene complexes. In both
cases the substituent of the olefin and the chelating substitu-
ent of the carbene carbon (here the alkoxycarbonyl group)
end preferentially in the same side of the cyclopropane. It is
worth mentioning that the molybdenum analogue of complex
1b failed in producing these cyclopropanes in a variety of
conditions tested. The synthetic potential of this methodology
is enhanced by the possibility of forming ACC derivatives
suitably substituted for the deprotection of both the amino
and the acid functions (Table 1, entry e).
(10) General experimental procedure for the cyclopropanation reaction:
A 0.1 M solution of complex 1 or 8 in toluene was treated with 4 equiv of
the olefin 2 and deoxygenated (3 freeze-pump-thaw cycles). The mixture
was then refluxed while a constant flow of N2 (g) was bubbled through it.
Once all the carbene complex was consumed (as seen by IR monitoring)
the reaction mixture was exposed to the air and sunlight. The reaction was
then filtered through Celite and chromatographed on silica gel. Selected
data: 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 7.31-7.25 (m, 5H, Ph), 2.68
(s, 6H, N(CH3)2), 2.62 (dd, 1H, J ) 9.5, 7.7 Hz, CHPh), 1.93 (dd, 1H, J
) 7.7, 4.6 Hz, 3â-ciclopropane), 1.29 (dd, 1H, J ) 9.5, 4.6 Hz,
3R-ciclopropane), 1.10 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3). 13C NMR (50.3 MHz, CDCl3):
δ (ppm) 169.9 (CO2R), 136.8 (C ipso), 129.2 (2 × CH, Ph), 127.8 (2 ×
CH, Ph), 126.4 (CH, p-Ph), 80.5 (CMe3), 54.0 (CNMe2), 41.4 (N(CH3)2),
35.2 (CHPh), 27.7 (C(CH3)3), 21.2 (CH2). HRMS (IE): calcd 261.1729;
found 261.1743.
(6) (a) Barluenga, J.; Aznar, F.; Mart´ın, A. Organometallics 1995, 14,
1429-1433. (b) Sierra, M. A.; Soderberg, B.; Lander, P. A.; Hegedus, L.
S. Organometallics 1993, 12, 3769-3771. (c) Sierra, M. A.; Manchen˜o,
M. J.; Sa´ez, E.; del Amo, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6812-6813.
(d) Woodgate, P. D.; Sutherland, H. S. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 628,
155-168. (e) Rotrekl, I.; Vyklicky´, L.; Dvorak, D. J. Organomet. Chem.
2001, 617-618, 329-333.
(7) Merino, I.; Hegedus, L. S. Organometallics 1995, 14, 2522-2531.
(8) (a) Dvorak, D.; Ludwig, M. Organometallics 1998, 17, 3627-3629.
(b) Dialer, H.; Polborn, K.; Beck, W. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 589, 21-
28.
(9) Reviews: (a) Stammer, C. H. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 2231-2254.
(b) Burgess, K.; Ho, K. K.; Moye-Sherman, D. Synlett 1994, 575-583.
4274
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 24, 2002