ꢀ
T. Bozi´c et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (2010) 923–929
928
applied to target cells to various final concentration ranging from
0 to 100 M. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenylte-
trazolium bromide) was dissolved (5 mg/ml) in phosphate buffer
saline, pH 7.2, and filtered through Millipore filter, 0.22 m, before
6.2.4. Antiviral activity
Antiviral activity to HIV was tested at the NIH-NCI according to
the standard procedure [37].
m
m
use. RPMI 1640 cells culture medium, FBS and MTT were Sigma
Chemicals products.
Acknowledgment
HeLa cells and Fem-X cells were cultured as monolayers in the
nutrient medium. K-562 cells were grown as a suspension culture
in the same nutrient medium. The cells were grown at 37 ꢀC in 5%
CO2 and humidified air atmosphere. Peripheral blood mononuclear
cells (PBMC) were separated from whole heparinized blood of
healthy volunteers by LymphoprepÔ gradient centrifugation.
Interface cells, washed three times with Haemaccel (aqueous
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science of the
Republic of Serbia (Grant 142026).
Appendix. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in
solution supplemented with 145 mM Naþ, 5.1 mM Kþ, 6.2 mM Ca2þ
,
145 mM Clꢂ and 35 g/l gelatin polymers, pH 7.4) were counted and
resuspended in the nutrient medium.
References
HeLa or Fem-X cells were seeded (2000 cells per well) into 96-
well microtiter plates and 20 h later, after the cell adherence, five
different concentrations of investigated compounds were added to
the wells. Leukemia K-562 cells were seeded (3000 cells per well)
in the nutrient medium. PBMC were seeded (150,000 cells per well)
into the nutrient medium or into the nutrient medium enriched
ˇ ´
[1] D. Sladic´, M.J. Gasic, Molecules 11 (2006) 1–33.
[2] L. Minale, R. Riccio, G. Sodano, Tetrahedron Lett. 15 (1974) 3401–3404.
[3] S. De Rosa, L. Minale, R. Riccio, G. Sodano, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 (1976)
1408–1414.
[4] W.E.G. Mu¨ller, R.K. Zahn, M.J. Gasic, N. Dogovic, A. Maidhof, C. Becker, B. Diehl-
Seifert, E. Eich, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 80C (1985) 47–52.
[5] W.E.G. Mu¨ller, A. Maidhof, R.K. Zahn, H.C. Schro¨der, M.J. Gasic, D. Heidemann,
A. Bernd, B. Kurelec, E. Eich, G. Seibert, Cancer Res. 45 (1985) 4822–4826.
[6] W.E.G. Mu¨ller, D. Sladic´, R.K. Zahn, K.H. Ba¨ssler, N. Dogovic´, H. Gerner,
ˇ ´
M.J. Gasic, H.C. Schroder, Cancer Res. 47 (1987) 6565–6571.
[7] G. Seibert, W. Raether, N. Dogovic´, M.J. Gasic, R.K. Zahn, W.E.G. Muller, Zbl.
Bakt. Hyg. 260A (1985) 379–386.
[8] R. Cozzolino, A. De Giulio, S. De Rosa, G. Strazzullo, M.J. Gasic, D. Sladic,
ˇ ´
´
ˇ ´
with (5
mg/ml) phytohemagglutinin (PHA) in 96-well microtiter
plates. Two hours later, investigated compounds were added to the
wells, to five final concentrations. Only nutrient medium was added
to the cells in the control wells with corresponding concentrations
of DMSO. The nutrient medium with corresponding concentrations
of compounds, but void of cells, was used as the blank.
HeLa and Fem-X cell survival were determined indirectly by
measuring total cellular protein by the Kenacid Blue R (KBR) dye
binding method [38]. Inhibition of growth of PBMC and K-562 cells
was determined by MTT test [39]. To get cell survival (%), absor-
bance A (at 570 nm) of a sample with cells grown in the presence of
various concentrations of compounds was divided with control
absorbance, Ac (the absorbance of control cells grown only in
nutrient medium), and multiplied by 100. It was implied that
absorbance of the blank was always subtracted from absorbance of
a corresponding sample with target cells. IC50 concentration was
defined as the concentration of a drug which inhibits cell survival
by 50%, compared with a vehicle-treated control.
¨
ˇ ´
¨
ˇ ´
´
M. Zlatovic´, J. Nat. Prod. 53 (1990) 699–702.
[9] P.S. Sarin, D. Sun, A. Thornton, W.E.G. Mu¨ller, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 78 (1987)
663–666.
´
´
[10] M.L. Ferrandiz, M.J. Sanz, G. Bustos, M. Paya, M.J. Alcaraz, S. De Rosa, Eur. J.
Pharmacol. 253 (1994) 75–82.
[11] M.A. Belisario, M. Maturo, G. Avagnale, S. De Rosa, F. Scopacasa, M. De Caterina,
Pharmacol. Toxicol. 79 (1996) 300–304.
[12] D. Sipkema, R. Osinga, W. Schatton, D. Mendola, J. Tramper, R.H. Wijffels,
Biotechnol. Bioeng. 90 (2005) 201–222.
[13] M. Amigo´ , M. Paya´, A. Braza-Bo¨ıls, S. De Rosa, M.C. Terencio, Life Sci. 82 (2008)
256–264.
[14] S. De Rosa, in: A.P. Rauter, F.B. Palma, J. Justino, M.E. Arau´ jo, S.P. dos Santos
(Eds.), Natural Products in the New Millenium: Prospects and Industrial
Application, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002, pp. 441–461.
[15] M.A. Belisario, M. Maturo, R. Pecce, S. De Rosa, G.R. Villani, Toxicology 72
(1992) 221–233.
ꢀ
[16] M. Tsoukatou, J.P. Mare´chal, C. Hellio, I. Novakovic´, S. Tufegdzic´, D. Sladic´,
ˇ ´
M.J. Gasic, A.S. Clare, C. Vagias, V. Roussis, Molecules 12 (2007) 1022–1034.
The compounds 5, 9 and 11 were tested by NIH-NCI for in vitro
screening in a panel of 60 human tumor cell lines starting at
a concentration of 1 ꢁ 10ꢂ4 M of the investigated compound [35].
Each cell line was treated by at least five different concentrations of
the investigated agents for 48 h, and afterwards the cell growth and
survival were estimated by the sulforhodamine test [35,40,41]. The
NCI renamed the IC50 value, the concentration that causes 50%
growth inhibition, the GI50 value to emphasize the correction for
the cell count at time zero.
´
[17] H.C. Schro¨der, R. Wenger, H. Gerner, P. Reuter, Y. Kuchino, D. Sladic,
W.E.G. Mu¨ ller, Cancer Res. 49 (1989) 2069–2076.
´
ˇ ´
[18] D. Sladic, M.J. Gasic, J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 59 (1994) 915–920.
ꢀ
ˇ ´
´
ˇ ´
ˇ ´
´
[19] M. Vujcic, S. Tufegdzic, Z. Vujcic, M.J. Gasic, D. Sladic, J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 72
(2007) 1265–1269.
[20] B. Pejin, C. Iodice, G. Tommonaro, S. De Rosa, J. Nat. Prod. 71 (2008)
1850–1853.
ˇ ´
[21] E. Batke, R. Ogura, P. Vaupel, K. Hummel, F. Kallinowski, M.J. Gasic,
H.C. Schro¨der, W.E.G. Mu¨ller, Cell Biochem. Funct. 6 (1987) 123–129.
ˇ ´
[22] H.C. Schroeder, M.E. Begin, R. Kloecking, E. Matthes, A.S. Sarma, M. Gasic,
W.E.G. Mueller, Virus Res. 21 (1991) 213–223.
ꢀ
ˇ ´
ˇ ´
´
[23] T. Bozic´, I. Novakovic´, Z. Vujcic, M.J. Gasic, D. Sladic, In: 4th International
Conference of the Chemical Societies of the South-East European Countries,
Belgrade, 2004, Book of Abstracts, Vol. I, GT-P, p. 146.
6.2.2. The brine shrimp test
The brine shrimp test was performed against freshly hatched
nauplii of Artemia salina [29]. Briefly, the compounds were dis-
solved in DMSO and diluted by artificial seawater so that an
appropriate range of concentrations was obtained. The final
concentration of DMSO was 1%, and the number of nauplii was 10.
Surviving nauplii were counted after 24 h, and LC50 (concentration
lethal to 50% of the nauplii) were determined after statistical
analysis. All the tests were performed in triplicate.
´
´
[24] M. Amigo, M. Paya, S. De Rosa, M.C. Terencio, Br. J. Pharmacol. 152 (2007)
353–365.
[25] M. Amigo´ , M.C. Terencio, M. Paya´, C. Iodice, S. De Rosa, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 17 (2007) 2561–2565.
[26] A.R. Diaz-Marrero, P. Austin, R. Van Soest, T. Matainaho, C.D. Roskelley,
M. Roberge, R.J. Andersen, Org. Lett. 8 (2006) 3749–3752.
[27] A. De Giulio, S. De Rosa, G. Strazzullo, L. Diliberto, P. Obino, M.E. Marongiu,
A. Pani, P. La Colla, Antiviral Chem. Chemother. 2 (1991) 223–227.
ˇ ´
[28] I. Trifunovic´, D. Sladic´, N. Dogovic´, M.J. Gasic, J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 52 (1987)
559–563.
[29] B.N. Meyer, N.R. Ferrigni, J.E. Putnam, L.B. Jacobsen, D.E. Nichols,
J.L. McLaughlin, Planta Med. 45 (1982) 31–34.
[30] T. Bozic, D. Sladic, M. Zlatovic, I. Novakovic, S. Trifunovic, M.J. Gasic, J. Serb.
6.2.3. Antibacterial activity
ꢀ
´
´
´
´
´
ˇ ´
Chem. Soc. 67 (2002) 547–551.
[31] I. Tabakovic´, A. Davidovic´, W.E.G. Mu¨ller, R.K. Zahn, D. Sladic´, N. Dogovic´,
ˇ ´
M.J. Gasic, Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 17 (1987) 567–577.
[32] A. Davidovic´, I. Tabakovic´, D. Sladic´, N. Dogovic´, M.J. Gasic, Bioelectrochem.
Antibacterial activity of the derivatives was tested against Gram
positive bacteria S. aureus ATCC 25923 and Gram negative bacteria
E. coli ATCC 35218 by the serial dilution method [7].
ˇ ´
Bioenerg. 26 (1991) 457–468.