but also from the rich and well-studied chemistry of olefins
that enables efficient synthesis of complex structures.
Therefore the development of R-vinylation reactions is very
attractive, as an addition to the related transition metal-
catalyzed reactions such as Heck, Suzuki, Negishi, and Stille
couplings, where use of vinyl coupling partners has been
broadly used in the synthesis of natural products.14
Table 1. Catalyst Evaluation
In conjunction with one of our programs, development of
an effective R-vinylation reaction of carbonyl compounds
was desirable as a synthetic strategy. Herein, we report our
results on the successful R-vinylation of 3-methyloxindole
and the related ketones and esters.
entry
Pd-source
ligand
n/a
n/a
n/a
XantPhos
S-Phos
X-Phos
Q-Phos
IPr-HCl
BINAP
S-MOP
S-MOP*
yield (%)a,b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
[PtBu3PdBr]2
(PhPtBu2)2PdCl2
(DTBPF)2PdCl2
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
94
55
72
<5
<5
<5
83
9
Oxindole 1 was selected as the model substrate due to the
presence of the structural motif in many biologically
important compounds.15 To our surprise, direct arylation of
1 has not been studied, although indirect synthesis of
N-methyloxindole has been reported via intramolecular or
stepwise intermolecular arylation.16 To develop a useful
R-vinylation reaction, we examined the coupling of 1 with
1-cyclohexenyl triflate 2 under various conditions. Two
features of this reaction were notable: (i) Although vinyl
triflates are easily prepared from the corresponding ketones,17
use of vinyl triflates in R-vinylation of enolates has not been
reported. (ii) Substrate 1 contains both C and N nucleophiles
which may result in the formation of mixed C-C and C-N
vinylated products when subjected to the reaction conditions.
To the best of our knowledge, there is no literature precedent
for R-arylation of an amide with a free N-H bond.
Initially, the model reaction was screened at 80 °C in
toluene with either Pd2(dba)3/ligand combination or a
preformed palladium complex18 as the catalyst, with lithium
hexamethyldisilazine (LHMDS) as base to generate the
enolate in situ.
20
34
32
10
11
Pd2(dba)3
a HPLC assay yield. b Reaction conditions: To a mixture of 1 (1.0 equiv),
Pd source (5 mol % Pd), and ligand (5-10 mol %) in toluene was added
LHMDS (2.5 equiv). The mixture was stirred for 5 min followed by addition
of 2 (1.5 equiv). The dark solution was heated to 80 °C for 24 h and analyzed
by HPLC.
successfully used in related palladium-catalyzed couplings,
including R-arylations, were less effective for the R-vinyl-
ation of 1. Interestingly, no instances of C-N coupling
product were observed.21
Having identified [Pd(PtBu3)Br]2 as the optimal catalyst,
the effects of solvent and base were next examined. With
LHMDS as base, reactions in toluene or xylene proceeded
smoothly, but those performed in dioxane, THF, DME, or
DMF occurred with lower yields. With toluene as solvent,
reactions carried out with LHMDS or NaHMDS as a base
gave the best yields, while those with Cs2CO3, K2CO3,
A few sterically hindered and electron-rich mono- and bis-
phosphines (Figure 1 and Table 1) were found effective,
(14) For a review of palladium-catalyzed couplings of vinyl compounds,
see: Nicolaou, K. C.; Sorensen, E. J. Classics in Total Synthesis; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1996; pp 565-631.
(15) (a) Somei, M.; Yamada, F. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2003, 20, 216. (b)
Hibino, S.; Choshi, T. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002, 19, 148. (c) Tang, Y.-Q.;
Sattler, I.; Thiericke, R.; Grabley, S.; Feng, S.-Z. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
261. (d) Suzuki, H.; Morita, H.; Shiro, M.; Kobayahsi, J. Tetrahedron 2004,
60, 2489. (e) Shintani, R.; Inoue, M.; Hayashi, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 3353.
(16) Lee, S.; Hartwig, J. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3402.
(17) Willis, M. C.; Brace, G. N.; Holmes, I. P. Synthesis 2005, 3229.
(18) The choosen catalysts have been shown successful in other coupling
reactions, see: (a) Hamada, T.; Chieffi, A.; A° hman, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1261. (b) Guram, A. S.; King, A. O.; Allen, J.
G.; Wang, X.; Schenkel, L. B.; Chan, J.; Bunel, E. B.; Faul, M. M.; Larsen,
R. D.; Martinelli, M. J.; Reider, P. J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1787. (c) Viciu,
M. S.; Germaneau, R. F.; Nolan, S. P. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4053. (d) Hama,
T.; Culkin, D. A.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4976. (e)
Yin, J.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6043. (f) Wu, L.;
Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15824.
Figure 1. Selected ligand structures.
(19) For experimental/characterization details, see the Supporting Infor-
mation.
(20) (a) Dura-Vila, V.; Mingos, D. M. P.; Vilar, R.; White, A. J. P.;
Williams, D. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 600, 198. (b) Stambuli, J. P.;
Kuwano, R.; Hartwig, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4746. (c)
Commercially available from Johnson Matthey.
(21) For examples of N-vinylation, see: (a) Movassaghi, M.; Ondrus,
A. E. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8638. (b) Klapars, A.; Campos, K. R.; Chen,
C.-Y.; Volante, R. P. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1185.
providing 55-94% yields of the coupled product 3 (Table
1, entries 1, 2, 3, and 7).19 The reaction catalyzed by the
dimeric Pd(I) complex [Pd(PtBu3)Br]220 afforded the highest
yield of 94% (Table 1, entry 1). Other ligands that have been
4344
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 21, 2007